CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityDigital Economy and Work TransformationEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automation and the future of work: An intersectional study of the role of human capital, income, gender and visible minority status

Open access
Petersen, Búi K, Chowhan, James, Cooke, Gordon B, Gosine, Ray, Warrian, Peter J·2023·Economic and Industrial Democracy
DOI 10.1177/0143831x221088301
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study extends prior research assessing the impacts of advancements in automation on employment by focusing on the effect on various population groups. Employing a human capital and intersectionality lens, and a moderated-mediation analysis of Canadian 2016 Census data, this study finds the effects of automation differ significantly depending on the intersections of income level, gender and visible minority status, differences that for the most part are explained (or mediated) by human capital, especially education. The article discusses several public policy implications related to the roles of individuals, employers and governments in addressing the resulting labour market challenges.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0143831x221088301

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1177/0891243206289499 · DOI
  2. 10.1162/003355303322552801 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/spol.12441 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/09687599.2020.1829556. · DOI
  5. 10.1177/0143831X06063098 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/08276331.2019.1616256 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2011) Race against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.
  9. 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03011-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0143831X20940779. · DOI
  11. Collins PH, Bilge S (2016) Intersectionality. Key Concepts series. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  12. Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1): 139–167.
  13. 10.1177/0143831X15609672 · DOI
  14. 10.29333/ejecs/78 · DOI
  15. Fadel C (2014) Hype vs. Reality: A Roundtable Discussion on the Impact of Technology and Artificial Intelligence on Employment. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Financial.
  16. 10.1177/0891243213504032 · DOI
  17. Galabuzi G-E (2006) Canada’s Economic Apartheid: The Social Exclusion of Racialized Groups in the New Century. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
  18. 10.1257/jep.29.3.165 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/0199247757.001.0001 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s13524-020-00867-7 · DOI
  21. Haugen S, Hallstrom L, Grant P, et al. (2021) Policy responses to automation in Canada. Journal of Rural and Community Development 16(1).
  22. Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd edn. Methodology in the Social Sciences series. New York: Guilford Press.
  23. 10.2307/3551526 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.brq.2019.04.005 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0730888420941031 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/0730888414535218 · DOI
  27. 10.1108/JMH-09-2018-0048 · DOI
  28. Levy F, Murnane R (2007) How computerized work and globalization shape human skill demands. In: Suárez-Orozco MM (ed.) Learning in the Global Era: International Perspectives on Globalization and Education. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 158–174.
  29. 10.1177/0143831X12442576 · DOI
  30. 10.1353/ces.2019.0013 · DOI
  31. 10.22381/KC5120173 · DOI
  32. Mincer J (1970) The distribution of labor incomes: A survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature 8(1): 1–26.
  33. Mincer J (1974) Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  34. 10.3102/0013189X018004027 · DOI
  35. OECD (2019) Determinants and impact of automation: An analysis of robots’ adoption in OECD countries. Available at: www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/determinants-and-impact-of-automation_ef425cb0-en (accessed 2 August 2020).
  36. 10.1177/0730888419860880 · DOI
  37. Oschinski M Wyonch R (2017) Future shock? The impact of automation on Canada’s labour market. Commentary No. 472. CD Howe Institute. Available at: www.ssrn.com/abstract=2934610 (accessed 18 February 2022). · DOI
  38. Pouliakas K (2018) Determinants of automation risk in the EU labour market: A skills-needs approach. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. Available at: www.iza.org/publications/dp/11829/determinants-of-automation-risk-in-the-eu-labour-market-a-skills-needs-approach (accessed 2 August 2020). · DOI
  39. 10.1177/0143831X20924461. · DOI
  40. 10.1177/0018726709353639 · DOI
  41. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301525 · DOI
  43. 10.7202/006904ar · DOI
  44. 10.1111/1468-4446.12239 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Wanasinghe TR, Trinh T, Nguyen T, et al. (2021) Human centric digital transformation and operator 4.0 for the oil and gas industry. IEEE Access 1–1.
  46. 10.1108/01437721011057038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Petersen, B. K., Chowhan, J., Cooke, G. B., Gosine, R., & Warrian, P. J.
Affiliations
  • St. Mary's University (CA)
  • York University (CA)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Petersen, Búi K
ORCID
Venue
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2022-05
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
703-727
ISSN
  • 0143-831X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7099
DOI
10.1177/0143831x221088301
OpenAlex
W4225273749
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Economic and Industrial Democracy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • atlantic canada opportunities agency
  • mitacs
  • Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto
  • petroleum research newfoundland and labrador
  • memorial university of newfoundland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
automation, future of work, intersectionality, human capital, income, gender, visible minorities, employment effects, labour market challenges, public policy, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review