CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 335Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychometric Properties of the Beck Depression Inventory—II (BDI-II) Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Segal, Daniel L., Coolidge, Frederick L., Cahill, Brian S., O'Riley, Alisa A.·2008·Behavior Modification
DOI 10.1177/0145445507303833
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory—II (BDI-II) as a self-administered screening tool for depressive symptoms were examined in a sample of community-dwelling older and younger adults. Participants completed the BDI-II, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, the Coolidge Axis II Inventory, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Short Psychological Well-Being Scale. Internal reliability of the BDI-II was found to be good among older and younger adults. The average BDI-II depression score did not differ between younger and older adults. Solid evidence for convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated by correlations between the BDI-II with the other measures. The BDI-II appears to have strong psychometric support as a screening measure for depression among older adults in the general population. Implications for using the BDI-II as an assessment instrument in behaviorally based psychotherapy are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445507303833

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beck, A.T., 1996, Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory—II
  2. Coolidge, F.L., 2004, Coolidge Axis II Inventory manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 334

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Segal, D. L., Coolidge, F. L., Cahill, B. S., & O'Riley, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
ORCID
Venue
Behavior Modification
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2008-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
3-20
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
DOI
10.1177/0145445507303833
OpenAlex
W2026064198
Cited by
335
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Beck Depression Inventory-II, depression screening, older adults, psychometric properties, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, psychological well-being, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review