The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
I Help You, and You Help Me
Abstract
Purpose The feasibility and acceptability of using an Interactive Voice Response (IVR)–based platform to facilitate peer support among older adults with diabetes was evaluated. Methods Diabetes patients with poor glycemic control receiving care at a Veterans' Affairs medical center completed a baseline survey, received rudimentary training, and were matched based on their diabetes-related self-management needs. They were asked to contact their partner weekly using the toll-free IVR calling line. At the completion of the 6-week period, participants completed follow-up surveys and brief telephone interviews. Results Forty of 76 patients screened for eligibility by telephone agreed to participate, and 38 completed the 6-week intervention (50% of eligible patients). More than 80% of the pairs spoke at least once a week for 2 of the 6 weeks of the intervention. A total of 79% of the participants reported that the IVR system was easy to use, and 90% stated that they would be more satisfied with their health care if this type of peer support service were available. Of the participants, 70% found the calls helpful in managing diabetes symptoms, 73% reported that their partner helped them improve their self-care, and 70% stated that they helped their partner do things to stay healthy. There were significant improvements in participants' reported diabetes self-care self-efficacy between baseline and follow-up assessments (P< .01). Qualitative assessments suggested that participants found meaning and positive reinforcement for their own self-care through supporting their partner's efforts to manage diabetes. Conclusions An IVR peer support intervention is feasible, acceptable to patients, and may have positive effects on patients' diabetes self-management and health outcomes that warrant more rigorous evaluation in a randomized trial.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These studies use an interactive voice response tool to enhance self-care and improve the diagnosis of disease decompensation.68,69”
From Reducing Diagnostic Errors through Effective Communication: Harnessing the Power of Information Technology (2008) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
Screening for Depression in Well Older Adults: Evaluation of a Short Form of the CES-D
Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30622-6 · Cited by 5,403
Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 4,426
Effectiveness of Self-Management Training in Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Engelgau, M. M., & Venkat Narayan, K. M. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.3.561 · Cited by 1,846
Chronic Disease Self-Management Program: 2-Year Health Status and Health Care Utilization Outcomes
Lorig, K. R., Ritter, P., Stewart, A. L., Sobel, D. S., William Brown, B., Bandura, A., Gonzalez, V. M., Laurent, D. D., & Holman, H. R. (2001) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200111000-00008 · Cited by 1,484
Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis
Dennis, C. (2003) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00092-5 · Cited by 1,293
Supporting Autonomy to Motivate Patients With Diabetes for Glucose Control
Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (1998) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.21.10.1644 · Cited by 1,177
Brown, S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., & Smith, D. M. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14461 · Cited by 1,142
Volunteering and depression: the role of psychological and social resources in different age groups
Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2002) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00025-4 · Cited by 970
Differential Benefits of Volunteering Across the Life Course
Van Willigen, M. (2000) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/55.5.s308 · Cited by 752
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 2001, Eff Clin Pract, 4, 256
- 1998, Geriatrics, 53, 68
- 1996, Cancer Pract, 4, 156
- 2002, Practical Psychology for Diabetes Clinicians, 3
- 1977, Applied Physiological Measurement, 1, 385
- 2002, Med Care, 40, I117
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diabetes Control With Reciprocal Peer Support Versus Nurse Care Management: A Randomized Trial
Heisler, M., Vijan, S., Makki, F., & Piette, J. D. (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007 · Cited by 366
Self-citationWhat is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review
Dale, J. R., Williams, S., & Bowyer, V. (2012) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03749.x · Cited by 313
Barriers to self‐management of diabetes
Ahola, A. J., & Groop, P. (2012) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.12105 · Cited by 291
The experience and impact of chronic disease peer support interventions: A qualitative synthesis
Embuldeniya, G., Veinot, P. L., Bell, E., Bell, M. J., Nyhof-Young, J. M., Sale, J. E. M., & Britten, N. (2013) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.002 · Cited by 249
Overview of Peer Support Models to Improve Diabetes Self-Management and Clinical Outcomes
Heisler, M. (2007) · Diabetes Spectrum · doi:10.2337/diaspect.20.4.214 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heisler, M., & Piette, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- The Diabetes Educator
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 869-879
- ISSN
- 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-6063
- OpenAlex
- W2075120468
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60DK020572, P60 DK 20572)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- interactive voice response, peer support, diabetes self-management, older adults, veterans, glycemic control, feasibility and acceptability, partner support, telephone-delivered intervention
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Social Behavior, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Telephone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review