Textual and Redactional Aspects of the Book of Dreams (1 Enoch 83–90)
Abstract
The redactor of 1 Enoch 83–90 brings together two very distinct Enochian traditions: the Flood Vision and the Animal Apocalypse. Although each tradition reflects a social reaction to the threat of hellenization in the second century BCE, they offer radically different social constructions of the eschatological role of insiders and outsiders; presenting in the Flood Vision a spatial apocalyptic perspective with a strong deterministic outlook, and in the Animal Apocalypse a less deterministic perspective within a temporal apocalyptic framework. By bringing these two traditions together, the redactor creates a new text (the Book of Dreams), which reinterprets the apocalypse with the vision. Although redactional activity is not extensive in the Book of Dreams, it does indicate a later stage in the tradition history, a stage reflecting back upon the success of the Maccabean revolt.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The depiction of the militant ram with the horn in 1 Enoch 90:9b-16 refers to the Maccabean war.
“It is widely recognised that this depiction of the militant ram with the horn in 90:9b-16 refers to the Maccabean war (cf Nickelsburg 2001:361;Albertz 1992:666;Tite 2001:113).”
From Reviewing history in apocalyptic literature as ideological strategy (2004) · cites this paper as Tite 2001:113
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reviewing history in apocalyptic literature as ideological strategy
Venter, P. M. (2004) · HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies · doi:10.4102/hts.v60i3.574 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tite, P. L.
- Corresponding author
- Tite, Philip L.
- ORCID
- Tite, Philip L.
- Venue
- Biblical Theology Bulletin: Journal of Bible and Culture
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 106-120
- ISSN
- 0146-1079 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7596
- OpenAlex
- W1906760922
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
- Keywords
- redaction, Animal Apocalypse, Hellenization, apocalyptic literature, eschatology, insider and outsider, Maccabeus revolt, textual history, determinism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review