The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction
Abstract
Two studies examined relations between groups (humanities and math-science students) that implicitly or explicitly share a common superordinate category (university student). In Experiment 1, 178 participants performed a noninteractive decision-making task during which category salience was manipulated in a 2 (superordinate category salience)× 2 (subordinate category salience) between-groups design. Consistent with the mutual intergroup differentiation model, participants for whom both categories were salient exhibited the lowest levels of bias, whereas bias was strongest when the superordinate category alone was made salient. This pattern of results was replicated in Experiment 2 (N = 135). In addition, Experiment 2 demonstrated that members of subgroups that are nested within a superordinate category are more sensitive to how the superordinate category is represented than are members of subgroups that extend beyond the boundaries of the superordinate category.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 10,806
Social Identity Theory and the Organization
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999 · Cited by 7,671
Carpenter, M. A., Cardon, M. S., McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011) · In Search of Research Excellence · doi:10.4337/9781849807630.00018 · Cited by 5,213
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
Social identity and intergroup relations.
Abrams, D. (2015) · APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 2: Group processes. · doi:10.1037/14342-008 · Cited by 2,686
European Journal of Social Psychology
(2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(issn)1099-0992 · Cited by 1,811
Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances.
Billig, M., Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076221 · Cited by 1,564
Self-citationCosmopolitans and Locals: Toward an Analysis of Latent Social Roles.I
Gouldner, A. W. (1957) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391000 · Cited by 1,553
Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities
Campbell, D. T. (2007) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830030103 · Cited by 1,528
Cited by
A Social Identity Theory of Leadership
Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_1 · Cited by 2,298
Self-citationHewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109 · Cited by 2,031
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 · Cited by 1,845
Hogg, M. A. (2000) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772043000040 · Cited by 1,011
Self-citationAssimilation and diversity: an integrative model of subgroup relations.
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0402_03 · Cited by 756
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 242-256
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2102679165
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 50.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167200264010
- The paper
- Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200264010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
