The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Daily Supportive Equity in Close Relationships
Abstract
Receiving support in committed relationships has frequently been associated with negative psychological outcomes in the recipient, such as increased distress. The authors hypothesized that these negative effects could be offset by support recipients' reciprocation of support, that is, by creating a sense of supportive equity. To investigate this hypothesis, the authors obtained daily reports of mood and of received and given emotional support from both partners in 85 couples throughout a 4-week period. Reciprocity in support transactions was associated with higher levels of positive mood and lower levels of negative mood. In line with previous research, receiving support without reciprocation was associated with increases in negative mood. Giving support, regardless of receipt, was associated with a decrease in negative mood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
(1998) · Cited by 2,713
McNair, D. M. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,531
New directions in equity research.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033967 · Cited by 1,649
Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.1.12 · Cited by 1,527
Bowlby, J. (1988) · Cited by 1,506
Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events
Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136504 · Cited by 1,431
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1053 · Cited by 1,303
Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students
Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsay, T. B. (1981) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00918174 · Cited by 1,217
Invisible support and adjustment to stress.
Bolger, N. P., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.953 · Cited by 1,102
Self-citation
Cited by
A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314544222 · Cited by 1,521
Uchino, B. N. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x · Cited by 1,506
The Convoy Model: Explaining Social Relations From a Multidisciplinary Perspective
Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Birditt, K. S. (2014) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnt118 · Cited by 933
Safely testing the alarm: Close others' responses to personal positive events.
Gable, S. L., Gosnell, C. L., Maisel, N. C., & Strachman, A. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029488 · Cited by 816
The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Well-Being Across Age
Siedlecki, K. L., Salthouse, T. A., Oishi, S., & Jeswani, S. (2014) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0361-4 · Cited by 781
Metadata
- Authors
- Gleason, M. E. J., Iida, M., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P. E.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1036-1045
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2023502263
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Daily Supportive Equity in Close Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167203253473
- The paper
- Gleason, M. E. J., Iida, M., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). Daily Supportive Equity in Close Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203253473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
