The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations
Abstract
Three studies address unresolved issues in value-behavior relations. Does the full range of different values relate to common, recurrent behaviors? Which values relate more strongly to behavior than others? Do relations among different values and behaviors exhibit a meaningful overall structure? If so, how to explain this? We find that stimulation and tradition values relate strongly to the behaviors that express them; hedonism, power, universalism, and self-direction values relate moderately; and security, conformity, achievement, and benevolence values relate only marginally. Additional findings suggest that these differences in value-behavior relations may stem from normative pressures to perform certain behaviors. Such findings imply that values motivate behavior, but the relation between values and behaviors is partly obscured by norms. Relations among behaviors, among values, and jointly among values and behavior exhibit a similar structure. The motivational conflicts and congruities postulated by the theory of values can account for this shared structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Self-citationMeta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Guttman, L. (1968) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02290164 · Cited by 1,343
McClelland, D. C. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139878289 · Cited by 1,231
Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact.
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.437 · Cited by 514
Self-citation
Cited by
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000096 · Cited by 2,075
The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship
Licht, A. N., & Siegel, J. I. (2009) · The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546992.003.0019 · Cited by 2,072
Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies.
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010 · Cited by 1,159
Self-citationDessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbz019 · Cited by 1,050
Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004 · Cited by 927
Metadata
- Authors
- Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1207-1220
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2112524266
- Cited by
- 1,664
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167203254602
- The paper
- Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
