Cited by 927Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS

Soto, Christopher J., John, Oliver P.·2017·Journal of Research in Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P.
Affiliations
  • Colby College (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Soto, Christopher J.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
68
Pages
69-81
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590578401
Cited by
927
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 174 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 13
FWCI
36.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California Berkeley
  • Colby College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Big Five Inventory-2, Big Five personality traits, personality facets, reliability statistics, validity, personality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review