The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Cultural Differences in Relationship- and Group-Based Trust
Abstract
Two experiments explored differences in depersonalized trust (trust toward a relatively unknown target person) across cultures. Based on a recent theoretical framework that postulates predominantly different bases for group behaviors in Western cultures versus Eastern cultures, it was predicted that Americans would tend to trust people primarily based on whether they shared category memberships; however, trust for Japanese was expected to be based on the likelihood of sharing direct or indirect interpersonal links. Results supported these predictions. In both Study 1 (questionnaire study) and Study 2 (online money allocation game), Americans trusted ingroup members more than outgroup members; however, the existence of a potential indirect relationship link increased trust for outgroup members more for Japanese than for Americans. Implications for understanding group processes across cultures are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,594
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory
REID, F. (1987) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00799.x · Cited by 8,091
Gamst, F. C. (1991) · Anthropology of Work Review · doi:10.1525/awr.1991.12.3.19 · Cited by 7,932
(2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,486
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,159
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3182 · Cited by 4,690
Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3664 · Cited by 4,014
Cited by
Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085559 · Cited by 1,238
Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.1.133 · Cited by 1,200
Self-citationThe What, How, Why, and Where of Self-Construal
Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310373752 · Cited by 800
Moffat, K., & Zhang, A. (2014) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003 · Cited by 718
Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities
Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607076007 · Cited by 718
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-62
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2090298515
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Cultural Differences in Relationship- and Group-Based Trust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167204271305
- The paper
- Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-Cultural Differences in Relationship- and Group-Based Trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
