Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attachment Style, Excessive Reassurance Seeking, Relationship Processes, and Depression

Shaver, Phillip R., Schachner, Dory A., Mikulincer, Mario·2005·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

The authors examined the association between excessive reassurance seeking (ERS) in couple relationships and depression, hypothesizing that this association can be explained by attachment anxiety. In Study 1, 72 couples completed questionnaires about ERS, depression, attachment style, and relationship quality. In Study 2, 61 couples completed the same measures in addition to completing daily diary assessments for 14 days. In both studies, ERS was related to depression, but only because of its association with attachment anxiety. The association between attachment anxiety and depression was not mediated by either partner’s relationship quality, even though partners noticed each other’s ERS. Instead, relationship quality was related primarily to avoidant attachment. These findings were replicated at a daily level of analysis, where interesting details of the underlying processes were revealed. At least in young unmarried couples, depression is associated with attachment anxiety—and one of its facets, ERS—mostly for intrapsychic reasons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167204271709

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Aiken, L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/s127-002-8215-0 · DOI
  4. Brennan, K. A., 1999, Psychological Inquiry, 10, 282
  5. Brennan, K. A., 1998, Attachment theory and close relationships, 46
  6. Bryk, A. S., 1992, Hierarchical linear models
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.127 · DOI
  8. Cassidy, J., 1999, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.810 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/00332747.1976.11023874 · DOI
  11. Crowell, J. A., 1999, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 434
  12. 10.1521/jscp.20.4.538.22394 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0146167200265007 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/1475-6811.00008 · DOI
  15. Gottman, J. M., 1994, What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes
  16. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.430 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.287 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/0021-843X.101.1.165 · DOI
  19. 10.1521/jscp.1993.12.2.113 · DOI
  20. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.778 · DOI
  21. Joiner, T. E., 1998, Reassurance-seeking: Delineating a risk factor involved in the development of depressive symptoms
  22. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1004_1 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0021-843X.107.3.533 · DOI
  24. 10.1521/jscp.1997.16.3.243 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00179.x · DOI
  26. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.502 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1092 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01002-5 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00277-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.664 · DOI
  31. Schachner, D. A., 2002, New Review of Social Psychology, 1, 122
  32. 10.1080/153250202753472291 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Shaver, P. R., Schachner, D. A., & Mikulincer, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California-Davis,
  • University of California-Davis
  • Bar-Ilan University
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2005-03
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
343-359
ISSN
  • 0146-1672
  • 1552-7433
Cited by
288
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review