Self-Affirmation and the Biased Processing of Threatening Health-Risk Information
Abstract
Self-affirming before reading about the link between alcohol and breast cancer promoted increased message acceptance among young women at higher risk. Differences were maintained on variables measured up to 1 month later. Relative to their nonaffirmed counterparts, higher risk, self-affirmed participants had higher ratings of risk, imagination, intention to reduce alcohol consumption, and negative affect, such as fear, while reading the leaflet. In contrast, there were no differences between the groups on measures of broader message acceptance (belief in the link, evidence strength). Thus, self-affirmation promoted acceptance of the personal relevance of the message, a critical step in the precaution adoption process. Overall, the findings support the view that self-affirmation in an unrelated domain can offset defensive processing of a threatening health message, promoting central route persuasion and producing consequential and durable increases in message acceptance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brief values writing exercises improve reactions to health messages.
“and improve reactions to health messages (Harris & Napper, 2005).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Contextual Behavioral Science: Examining the Progress of a Distinctive Model of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as Harris & Napper, 2005
However, in some studies, affirmed participants fail to make the behavioral changes that they predict they will.
“However, in some studies, affirmed participants fail to make the behavioral changes that they predict they will (Harris et al. 2007, Harris & Napper 2005, Reed & Aspinwall 1998; for a review, see Harris & Epton 2010).”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Harris & Napper 2005
The effects of affirmation on attitude and motivation tend to persist, even one month later.
“The effects of affirmation on attitude and motivation tend to persist, even one month later (Harris et al. 2007, Harris & Napper 2005).”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Harris & Napper 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 319
- Authors
- Harris, P. R., & Napper, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Peter R.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1250-1263
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2061295764
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 232.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- self-affirmation, health risk messages, message acceptance, defensive processing, young women, risk perception, persuasion
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Alcoholism, Analysis of Variance, Attitude to Health, Breast Neoplasms, Female, United Kingdom, Health Education, Humans, Persuasive Communication, Regression Analysis, Risk, Self Concept, Single-Blind Method, Intention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review