Cited by 104Cultural Differences and ValuesEmotions and Moral BehaviorPersonality Traits and Psychology

Mirrors in the Head: Cultural Variation in Objective Self-Awareness

Heine, Steven J., Takemoto, Timothy, Moskalenko, Sophia, Lasaleta, Jannine, Henrich, Joseph·2008·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

In a society where there are pronounced concerns for “face,” people come to be especially focused on how they are being evaluated by others. We reasoned that Japanese should conceive of themselves in terms of how they think they are considered by others. This hypothesis was tested by contrasting Japanese and North American participants who were in front of a mirror with those who were not. In two studies, replicating past research, North Americans who were in front of a mirror were more self-critical and were less likely to cheat than were those who were not in front of a mirror. In contrast, Japanese participants were unaffected by the presence of the mirror.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167208316921

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concern with maintaining face leads East Asians to adhere to social norms, whereas concern with enhancing self-esteem leads Westerners to adhere to their own internal standards.

    “Moreover, concern with main taining 'face' leads East Asians to adhere to social norms, whereas concern with enhancing self-esteem leads Westerners to adhere to tiieir own internal standards (Heine, Takemoto, Moskalenko, Lasaleta, & Henrich, 2008).”

    From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Heine, Takemoto, Moskalenko, Lasaleta, & Henrich, 2008

  • Increased self-awareness has broad effects on behavior, a prominent outcome being adaptation of behavior.

    “The evidence on the effects of increased self-awareness on behavior is broad and extensive. A prominent and objective outcome of self-awareness is the adaptation of behavior (Chartrand and Bargh 1999; Dzieweczynski et al. 2006; Heine et al. 2008; Jones and Nisbett 1971; Morin 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heine, S. J., Takemoto, T., Moskalenko, S., Lasaleta, J., & Henrich, J.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Yamaguchi University (JP)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Heine, Steven J.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2008-05-09
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
879-887
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2147300813
Cited by
104
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh060155-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH060155-01A2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
self-awareness, face, cultural variation, Japanese culture, North American culture, self-criticism, cheating, social evaluation, self-concept
MeSH terms
Awareness, Body Image, British Columbia, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Humans, Imagination, Japan, Middle Aged, Motivation, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Social Desirability, Students, United States, Personal Construct Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review