Cited by 62Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Is Love Colorblind? Political Orientation and Interracial Romantic Desire

Eastwick, Paul W., Richeson, Jennifer A., Son, Deborah, Finkel, Eli J.·2009·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

The present research examined the association of political orientation with ingroup favoritism in two live romantic contexts. In Study 1, White participants had sequential interactions with both a White and Black confederate and reported their romantic desire for each. In Study 2, both White and Black participants speed-dated multiple potential romantic partners and reported whether they would be interested in meeting each speed-dating partner again. In both studies, White participants' political conservatism positively predicted the strength of the ingroup-favoring bias: White conservatives were less likely than White liberals to desire Black (interracial) relative to White potential romantic partners. In contrast, Black participants' political conservatism negatively predicted the strength of the ingroup-favoring bias: Consistent with system-justification theory, Black conservatives were more likely than Black liberals to desire White (interracial) relative to Black potential romantic partners. Political orientation may be a key factor that influences the initiation of interracial romantic relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167209338524

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55 · Cited by 62

Authors
Eastwick, P. W., Richeson, J. A., Son, D., & Finkel, E. J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Eastwick, Paul W.
  • Richeson, Jennifer A.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
1258-1268
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2133725185
Cited by
62
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
political orientation, political conservatism, in-group favoritism, romantic desire, speed dating, system justification theory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Courtship, Culture, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Love, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Politics, Race Relations, Social Identification, Thematic Apperception Test, Black People, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review