Is Love Colorblind? Political Orientation and Interracial Romantic Desire
Abstract
The present research examined the association of political orientation with ingroup favoritism in two live romantic contexts. In Study 1, White participants had sequential interactions with both a White and Black confederate and reported their romantic desire for each. In Study 2, both White and Black participants speed-dated multiple potential romantic partners and reported whether they would be interested in meeting each speed-dating partner again. In both studies, White participants' political conservatism positively predicted the strength of the ingroup-favoring bias: White conservatives were less likely than White liberals to desire Black (interracial) relative to White potential romantic partners. In contrast, Black participants' political conservatism negatively predicted the strength of the ingroup-favoring bias: Consistent with system-justification theory, Black conservatives were more likely than Black liberals to desire White (interracial) relative to Black potential romantic partners. Political orientation may be a key factor that influences the initiation of interracial romantic relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is evidence that ideological and partisan considerations inform the choice of friends, as well as business and romantic partners.
“there is evidence that ideological and partisan considerations inform the choice of friends, as well as business and romantic partners218–221.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [218]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 55 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Eastwick, P. W., Richeson, J. A., Son, D., & Finkel, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eastwick, Paul W.
- Richeson, Jennifer A.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1258-1268
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2133725185
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- political orientation, political conservatism, in-group favoritism, romantic desire, speed dating, system justification theory
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Courtship, Culture, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Love, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Politics, Race Relations, Social Identification, Thematic Apperception Test, Black People, White People, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review