Cited by 200Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentForgiveness and Related BehaviorsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Letting People Off the Hook: When Do Good Deeds Excuse Transgressions?

Effron, Daniel A., Monin, Benoît·2010·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Three studies examined when and why an actor's prior good deeds make observers more willing to excuse--or license--his or her subsequent, morally dubious behavior. In a pilot study, actors' good deeds made participants more forgiving of the actors' subsequent transgressions. In Study 1, participants only licensed blatant transgressions that were in a different domain than actors' good deeds; blatant transgressions in the same domain appeared hypocritical and suppressed licensing (e.g., fighting adolescent drug use excused sexual harassment, but fighting sexual harassment did not). Study 2 replicated these effects and showed that good deeds made observers license ambiguous transgressions (e.g., behavior that might or might not represent sexual harassment) regardless of whether the good deeds and the transgression were in the same or in a different domain--but only same-domain good deeds did so by changing participants' construal of the transgressions. Discussion integrates two models of why licensing occurs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167210385922

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hakim, D., 2008, G.O.P. Consultant says he reported Spitzer trysts in 2007
  2. Hastorf, A.H., 1970, Person perception
  3. Jordan, J., 2009, Moral miscreants and unethical angels: Striving to achieve a moral equilibrium
  4. Powell, C.A.J., 2009, The inherent joy in seeing hypocrites hoisted with their own petards

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Effron, D. A., & Monin, B.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Effron, Daniel A.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2010-10-26
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1618-1634
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2092843370
Cited by
199
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
moral transgression, forgiveness, hypocrisy, domain specificity, construal level, moral judgment, sexual harassment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Decision Making, Female, Guilt, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Morals, Pilot Projects, Punishment, Social Behavior, Social Justice, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review