The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promotion Orientation Explains Why Future-Oriented People Exercise and Eat Healthy: Evidence From the Two-Factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale
Abstract
The authors extended research linking individual differences in consideration of future consequences (CFC) with health behaviors by (a) testing whether individual differences in regulatory focus would mediate that link and (b) highlighting the value of a revised, two-factor CFC-14 scale with subscales assessing concern with future consequences (CFC-Future) and concern with immediate consequences (CFC-Immediate) proper. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the revised CFC-14 scale supported the presence of two highly reliable factors (CFC-Future and CFC-Immediate; αs from .80 to .84). Moreover, structural equation modeling showed that those high in CFC-Future engage in exercise and healthy eating because they adopt a promotion orientation. Future use of the two-factor CFC-14 scale is encouraged to shed additional light on how concern with future and concern with immediate consequences (proper) differentially impact the way people resolve a host of intertemporal dilemmas (e.g., health, financial, and environmental behavior).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We measured future orientation by using six items of the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences Scale, CFC-14 (α = 0.77 for UK and α = 0.70 for Turkey) [29].”
From Adaptive function and correlates of anxiety during a pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors
Cattell, R. B. (1966) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · Cited by 13,554
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651257 · Cited by 12,583
Prevalence and Trends in Obesity Among US Adults, 1999-2008
Flegal, K. M. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.2014 · Cited by 7,580
Higgins, E. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.12.1280 · Cited by 6,775
Yu, S. M. (1998) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1021801927353 · Cited by 3,876
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 · Cited by 3,270
誠一, 市. (2004) · The Journal of AIDS Research · doi:10.11391/aidsr1999.6.104 · Cited by 3,233
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychology of social dilemmas: A review
Lange, P. A. M. V., Joireman, J. A., Parks, C. D., & van Dijk, E. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003 · Cited by 819
Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kooij, D. T. A. M., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000306 · Cited by 662
Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application
Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., & van Beek, W. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2 · Cited by 332
Egelman, S., & Péer, E. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702249 · Cited by 303
Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective
Balliet, D. P., & Ferris, D. L. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.004 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-07-25
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1272-1287
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2113163407
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 27.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- consideration of future consequences, regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, exercise behavior, healthy eating, health behavior, individual differences, intertemporal choice
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Eating, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Forecasting, Health Promotion, Humans, Orientation, Personality, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Time Perception, Health Behavior, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
