Self-Affirmation Underlies Facebook Use
Abstract
Social network sites, such as Facebook, have acquired an unprecedented following, yet it is unknown what makes them so attractive to users. Here we propose that these sites' popularity can be understood through the fulfillment of ego needs. We use self-affirmation theory to hypothesize why and when people spend time on their online profiles. Study 1 shows that Facebook profiles are self-affirming in the sense of satisfying users' need for self-worth and self-integrity. Study 2 shows that Facebook users gravitate toward their online profiles after receiving a blow to the ego, in an unconscious effort to repair their perceptions of self-worth. In addition to illuminating some of the psychological factors that underlie Facebook use, the results provide an important extension to self-affirmation theory by clarifying how self-affirmation operates in people's everyday environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social networking sites may be used by young people in the face of setbacks.
“Social networking sites may be used by young people in the face of setbacks”
From Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. (2020) · cites this paper as Toma & Hancock, 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 66 · Cited by 362
- Authors
- Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-331
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2112400545
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 41.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- self-affirmation theory, Facebook use, social network sites, self-worth, self-integrity, ego threat, online self-presentation
- MeSH terms
- Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, New England, Personal Satisfaction, Psychological Theory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Young Adult, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review