Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What does the Schema Concept Buy us?

Fiske, Susan T., Linville, Patricia W.·1980·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/014616728064006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent enthusiasm for the social schema concept has been accompanied by a wave of criticism. Skeptics argue that the concept is imprecise and nonfalsifiable, irrelevant to real social phenomena, and simply old wine in a new bottle. While finding elements of truth in each criticism, this article concludes that the strengths of the schema framework more than outweigh the liabilities associated with these criticisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014616728064006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Markus, H., American Psychological Association Meeting
  2. Wyer, R. S., 1979, The nature and use of schemata about persons
  3. Michela, J. L., 1979, Attribution processes in prediction and enactment of behavior
  4. Fiske, S. T., 1980, Political person perception
  5. Linville, P. W., 1980, Schema complexity and evaluative extremity in age-based stereotyping
  6. Fiske, S. T., 1980, The novice and the expert: Schematic strategies in political cognition
  7. Abelson, R. P., American Psychologist
  8. Anderson, J. R., 1976, Language, memory, and thought
  9. Anderson, J. R., 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation
  10. Anderson, J. R., 1980, Cognitive psychology and its implications
  11. 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90485-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50010-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90009-4 · DOI
  14. Bransford, J. D., 1979, Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering
  15. Calder, B. J., 1973, Attitudes and behavior
  16. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60258-0 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Carroll, J. S., 1976, Cognition and social behavior
  18. Clark, M. S, Cognitive Social Psychology Vol. 1. Theories and Issues in Psychology
  19. Deutsch, M., 1965, Theories in social psychology
  20. Fiske, S. T., 1980, Cognition, social behavior, and the environment
  21. Fiske, S. T., 1980, Personality, cognition, and social interaction
  22. Gergen, K. J., 1969, The psychology of behavior exchange
  23. Hamilton, D. L., 1980, Person memory: The cognitive basis of socialperception
  24. Hastie, R., 1980, Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Behavior
  25. Hastie, R., 1980, Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception
  26. Hastie, R., 1980, Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception
  27. 10.1037/10628-000 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Higgins, E. T., 1980, Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology
  29. Higgins, E. T., 1980, Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology
  30. 10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Jones, E. E., 1976, New directions in attribution research
  32. 10.1007/978-1-4615-8765-1_10 · DOI
  33. Kiesler, C. A., 1969, Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches
  34. Larkin, J. H., 1980, Science, 208, 1335, 10.1126/science.208.4450.1335 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.5.689 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/014616727700300402 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63 · DOI
  38. Neisser, V., 1976, Cognition and reality
  39. Neisser, V., 1979, On the nature of thought: Essays in honor of D. O. Hebb
  40. Nisbett, R. E., 1980, Human inference: Strategies and shortcoming in social judgment
  41. Quine, W. V., 1970, The web of belief
  42. 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90010-0 · DOI
  43. Rumelhart, D. E., 1977, Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge
  44. Schank, R., 1977, Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures
  45. Schneider, D. J., 1979, Person perception
  46. Simon, H. A., 1978, Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes
  47. Smith, E. E., 1980, Nebraska Syvmposium
  48. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.9.941 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Tagiuri, R., 1958, Person perception and interpersonal behavior
  50. Taylor, S. E., 1980, Cognition, social behavior, and the environment
  51. Taylor, S. E., 1980, Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology
  52. Taylor, S. E., New directions in attribution research
  53. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60010-6 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00619.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. Wyer, R. S., Jr., 1980, Social cognition:- The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology
  56. 10.1016/0022-1031(74)90055-9 · DOI
  57. Zajonc, R. B., 1980, Four decades of social psychology

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Fiske, S. T., & Linville, P. W.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1980-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
543-557
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/014616728064006
OpenAlex
W2075199288
Cited by
554
References
2
FWCI
23.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What does the Schema Concept Buy us? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/014616728064006
The paper
Fiske, S. T., & Linville, P. W. (1980). What does the Schema Concept Buy us? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728064006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.