The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference
Abstract
Previous research has shown that the trait implication of a behavior cues recall of that behavior even when subjects have no impression formation goals. This suggests that trait inferences are made spontaneously at encoding, but alternative explanations have suggested that retrieval processes alone can account for these data. In Experiment 1, encoding conditions were varied by subtly priming alternative traits relevant to ambiguous behaviors. Contrary to retrieval interpretations, the effectiveness of trait cues varied with the nature of the primes and awareness of the primes at encoding. Primes led to both assimilation and contrast effects and seemed to operate primarily by inhibiting alternative trait constructs. In Experiment 2, contrast effects were found with the same stimuli when priming was blatant and inferences were made intentionally. Results are discussed in terms of the role of construct activation and inhibition in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540
Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect
Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.2.155 · Cited by 913
Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.
Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.10.867 · Cited by 853
Cited by
The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs.
Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.509 · Cited by 1,314
Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes.
Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.6.925 · Cited by 1,150
Wenzlaff, R. M., & Wegner, D. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.59 · Cited by 1,063
Consciousness, explanatory inversion and cognitive science
Searle, J. R. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00029587 · Cited by 490
The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60017-9 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman, L. S., & Uleman, J. S.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 224-240
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W1963676030
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 97.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167290162004
- The paper
- Newman, L. S., & Uleman, J. S. (1990). Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167290162004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.