Cited by 95Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Juncture of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Knowledge: Self-Certainty and Interpersonal Congruence

Pelham, Brett W., Swann, William B.·1994·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

It is proposed that when targets are especially certain of their self-views, their interaction partners will be especially likely to develop impressions of them that are consistent with these self-views. Two studies supported this prediction by demonstrating that, for self-views about which targets were highly certain, targets received self-consistent interpersonal appraisals. In contrast, in areas in which the same targets were relatively uncertain of their self-views, the appraisals they received were only weakly related to their self-views. This difference held for judgments of both valenced and nonvalenced traits and for judgments made by both poorly and well-acquainted raters. Potential mediators of interpersonal congruence are discussed, along with the implications of these findings for the accuracy of social perception and for the role of belief investment in self-concept maintenance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167294204002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SFPs of trait ascriptions occurred only when ascribers were certain of the ascriptions, not when they were less confident.

    “For several studies found that SFPs of trait ascriptions occurred only when ascribers were certain of the ascriptions, not when they were less confident (Swann and Ely 1984;Pelham and Swann 1994;Swann 2012: 30).”

    From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Pelham and Swann 1994

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 95

Authors
Pelham, B. W., & Swann, W. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1994-08
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
349-357
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2051117084
Cited by
95
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-certainty, self-concept, interpersonal perception, self-view, self-concept maintenance, trait judgments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review