The Juncture of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Knowledge: Self-Certainty and Interpersonal Congruence
Abstract
It is proposed that when targets are especially certain of their self-views, their interaction partners will be especially likely to develop impressions of them that are consistent with these self-views. Two studies supported this prediction by demonstrating that, for self-views about which targets were highly certain, targets received self-consistent interpersonal appraisals. In contrast, in areas in which the same targets were relatively uncertain of their self-views, the appraisals they received were only weakly related to their self-views. This difference held for judgments of both valenced and nonvalenced traits and for judgments made by both poorly and well-acquainted raters. Potential mediators of interpersonal congruence are discussed, along with the implications of these findings for the accuracy of social perception and for the role of belief investment in self-concept maintenance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SFPs of trait ascriptions occurred only when ascribers were certain of the ascriptions, not when they were less confident.
“For several studies found that SFPs of trait ascriptions occurred only when ascribers were certain of the ascriptions, not when they were less confident (Swann and Ely 1984;Pelham and Swann 1994;Swann 2012: 30).”
From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Pelham and Swann 1994
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Pelham, B. W., & Swann, W. B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-357
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2051117084
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- self-certainty, self-concept, interpersonal perception, self-view, self-concept maintenance, trait judgments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review