The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1. Introduction
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a result, the deposited fraction in the lungs reaches a maximum of about 50% of the inhaled aerosol at a size of 20 nm [49, 50] with about 15% alveolar deposition and 35% depositing in the conducting airways of the head and thorax.”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Wiemann, M., Vennemann, A., Sauer, U. G., Wiench, K., Ma-Hock, L., & Landsiedel, R. (2016) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-016-0164-2 · Cited by 152
Dosimetric Comparisons of Particle Deposition and Retention in Rats and Humans
Brown, J. S., Wilson, W. E., & Grant, L. D. (2005) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370590929475 · Cited by 131
Larsen, S. T., Jackson, P., Poulsen, S. S., Levin, M., Jensen, K. A., Wallin, H., Nielsen, G. D., & Koponen, I. K. (2016) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.1080/17435390.2016.1202350 · Cited by 79
Gillespie, P. A., Kang, G. S., Elder, A., Gelein, R., Chen, L., Moreira, A. L., Koberstein, J., Tchou-Wong, K.-M., Gordon, T., & Chen, L. C. (2010) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390903470101 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Venue
- Annals of the ICRP
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0146-6453
- 1872-969X
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 1. Introduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/014664539402401-303
- The paper
- 1. Introduction. (1994). Annals of the ICRP. https://doi.org/10.1177/014664539402401-303
