Cited by 122Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesNosocomial Infections in ICU

Pulmonary Complications of 9931 Narrow‐Bore Nasoenteric Tubes During Blind Placement: A Critical Review

Open access
Sparks, Dorothy A., Chase, Daniel M., Coughlin, Lisa M., Perry, Earnest·2011·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Introduction: A critical review of the pulmonary complications associated with blind placement of narrow‐bore nasoenteric tubes (NETs) is discussed. Preventive measures and placement techniques are addressed to decrease patient morbidity and mortality. Methods: A thorough database review was conducted to identify all randomized controlled and retrospective trials specifically addressing pulmonary complications from narrow‐bore NET placement. Five unique studies, comprising more than 9900 NET placements, were identified. On the basis of the literature reviewed, the authors identified 3 major complications associated with blind NET placement: patient mortality directly resulting from NET misplacement, incidence of tracheopulmonary malpositioning, and correlation between NET misplacement and mechanical ventilation. Results: Of the 9931 NET placements reviewed, there were 187 total improper tube placements in the tracheobronchial tree, which translates to a 1.9% mean overall malposition rate. Of these 187 misplacements, there were 35 (18.7%) reported pneumothoraces, at least 5 of which resulted in patient death. NET malpositioning was reported in 13%–32% of subsequent repositioning attempts. This increased risk exposes the patient population to a cumulative mortality from tracheobronchial malpositioning approaching >20%. Unexpectedly, of the 187 total misplacements, 113 (60.4%) of the patients were mechanically ventilated. Conclusions: Practitioners need to be aware of the potential for pulmonary complications associated with blind NET placement. Changes in institutional protocol should be considered to minimize unnecessary risks. As with any procedure, experienced personnel should be primarily used for tube placement and responsible for assisting others with less familiarity to learn the proper methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607111413898

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In individual patients, both nasogastric tube feeding and PEG feeding may be harmful.

    “Complication rates of EN are reported to be generally low (160), but in individual patients, both nasogastric tube feeding and PEG feeding may be harmful (136, 161).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Rassias A, Ball P, Corwin H. A prospective study of tracheopulmo- nary complications associated with the placement of narrow-bore enteral feeding tubes. Crit Care. 1998;2:25-28.
  2. de Aguilar-Nascimento J, Kudsk K. Clinical costs of feeding tube placement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31:269-273.
  3. Marderstein E, Simmons R, Ochoa J. Effect of institutional proto- cols on adverse events related to feeding tube placement in the critically ill. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:39-50.
  4. Sorokin R, Gottlieb J. Enhancing patient safety during feeding- tube insertion: a review of more than 2000 insertions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30:440-445.
  5. McWey R, Curry N, Schabel S, Reines D. Complications of nasoenteric feeding tubes. Am J Surg. 1988;155:253-257.
  6. Metheny N. Preventing respiratory complications of tube feedings: evidence based practice. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(4):360-369.
  7. Spurrier EJ, Johnston AM. Use of nasogastric tubes in trauma patients: a review. J R Army Med Corps. 2008;154(1):10-13.
  8. Brousseau VJ, Kost KM. A rare but serious entity: nasogastric tube syndrome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(5):677-679.
  9. Nuutienen L. Enteral or parenteral nutrition? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1997;110:141-142.
  10. Biggart M, McQuillan PJ, Choudhry AK, Nickalls RW. Dangers of placement of narrow bore nasogastric feeding tubes. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987;69(3):119-121.
  11. Dorsey JS, Cogordan J. Nasotracheal intubation and pulmonary parenchymal perforation: an unusual complication of naso-enteral feeding with small-diameter feeding tubes. Chest. 1985;87(1):131- 132.
  12. Sheffner SE, Gross BH, Birnberg FA, Birk P. Iatrogenic broncho- pleural fistula caused by feeding tube insertion. J Can Assoc Radiol. 1985;36(1):52-55.
  13. Woodall BH, Winfield DF, Bisset GS III. Inadvertent tracheobron- chial placement of feeding tubes. Radiology. 1987;165(3):727- 729.
  14. Torrington KG, Bowman MA. Fatal hydrothorax and empyema complicating a malpositioned nasogastric tube. Chest. 1981;79(2): 240-242.
  15. Baskin WN. Acute complications associated with bedside place- ment of feeding tubes. Nutr Clin Pract. 2006;21(1):40-55.
  16. Peter S, Gill F. Development of a clinical practice guideline for testing nasogastric tube placement. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2009;14(1): 3-11.
  17. Gabriel SA, Ackermann RJ. Placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes using external magnetic guidance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004;28(2):119-122.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sparks, D. A., Chase, D. M., Coughlin, L. M., & Perry, E.
Affiliations
  • Danbury Hospital (US)
  • University of Toledo Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Sparks, Dorothy A.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-28
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
625-629
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W1969069564
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Pittsburgh
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
pulmonary complications, tube malposition, pneumothorax, tube repositioning, mechanical ventilation, patient mortality, enteral nutrition, tube placement technique
MeSH terms
Enteral Nutrition, Humans, Intubation, Gastrointestinal, Pneumothorax, Radiography, Respiration, Artificial, Risk Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review