The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jonathan E. Rhoads Lecture 2011: Insulin Resistance and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Abstract
This lecture reviews the current understanding of how insulin resistance, as a marker of the metabolic stress, is involved in recovery after major surgery. Insulin resistance develops as a graded response related to the magnitude of the operation. It lasts for weeks after medium‐size surgery and affects all parts of body metabolism. Although hyperglycemia develops, muscle and fat uptake is reduced and other non‐insulin‐sensitive cells have an increase in glucose uptake as a result of the elevated glucose levels. Reduced glucose uptake and storage in muscle along with loss of lean body mass help explain reduced muscle function that will impair mobilization. The increased uptake of glucose in non‐insulin‐sensitive cells is involved in the development of several of the most common postoperative complications, including infections and cardiovascular problems. Many of the perioperative treatments in use are outdated, and modern care involves a multimodal approach with several treatments, such as preoperative carbohydrate treatment instead of overnight fasting, continuous epidural anesthesia for postoperative pain care, early feeding, and mobilization, all of which affect insulin by reducing the stress and enhancing recovery. Most of the previous mandatory catabolic responses to surgery can be avoided, resulting in substantially faster recovery and fewer complications. Methods to implement these modern treatments have been developed and used in Europe, resulting in improved care and shorter length of stay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
(2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810625 · Cited by 5,119
Use and Abuse of HOMA Modeling
Wallace, T. M., Levy, J. C., & Matthews, D. R. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.6.1487 · Cited by 5,114
Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications
Brady, M. C., Kinn, S., Stuart, P., & Ness, V. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004423 · Cited by 694
Cited by
ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients
Arends, J., Bachmann, P., Baracos, V., Barthelemy, N., Bertz, H., Bozzetti, F., Fearon, K., Hütterer, E., Isenring, E., Kaasa, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015 · Cited by 3,114
Promoting perioperative metabolic and nutritional care
Gillis, C., & Carli, F. (2015) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000795 · Cited by 350
Shi, Y., Dong, B., Dong, Q., Zhao, Z., & Yu, Y. (2021) · Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2020.05.006 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Ljungqvist, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 389-398
- ISSN
- 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-2444
- OpenAlex
- W2020838527
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jonathan E. Rhoads Lecture 2011: Insulin Resistance and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0148607112445580
- The paper
- Ljungqvist, O. (2012). Jonathan E. Rhoads Lecture 2011: Insulin Resistance and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607112445580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.