The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Staffing in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Strategic Opportunities
Abstract
Modern organizations struggle with staffing challenges stemming from increased knowledge work, labor shortages, competition for applicants, and workforce diversity. Yet, despite such critical needs for effective staffing practice, staffing research continues to be neglected or misunderstood by many organizational decision makers. Solving these challenges requires staffing scholars to expand their focus from individual-level recruitment and selection research to multilevel research demonstrating the business unit/organizational- level impact of staffing. Toward this end, this review provides a selective and critical analysis of staffing best practices covering literature from roughly 2000 to the present. Several research-practice gaps are also identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875 · Cited by 2,224
Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928 · Cited by 1,182
Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta‐Analysis
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x · Cited by 816
Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.4.302 · Cited by 387
Rynes, S. L., Brown, K. G., & Colbert, A. E. (2002) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.2002.8540341 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0848 · Cited by 722
Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Ferolie, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.009 · Cited by 391
Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1681401 · Cited by 218
Tsai, W., & Yang, I. W. (2010) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00488.x · Cited by 108
VAN IDDEKINGE, C. H., & PLOYHART, R. E. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00133.x · Cited by 101
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ployhart, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 868-897
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2067451899
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 30.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staffing in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Strategic Opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206306293625
- The paper
- Ployhart, R. E. (2006). Staffing in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Strategic Opportunities. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306293625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
