The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
Abstract
This review reorganizes and reconceptualizes extant research on patent strategy, which has emerged from diverse roots in economics, law, and management. Accordingly, it is anticipated that this review will help provide structure and direction to what is currently a somewhat disparate and fractured field of study within management. The main proposed framework highlights two important themes within patent strategy research—generic patent strategies and the strategic management of patents. In addition, it is noted that research in each of these themes generally maps onto one or more of three key domains—rights, licensing, or enforcement—within which patent-related strategic actions are typically undertaken. Two summary tables of prior research are provided that juxtapose the three patent strategy domains with different theory lenses adopted in patent strategy research. Finally, the article highlights two promising areas whose connections with patent strategy are beginning to be addressed by research—firms’ overall appropriability strategies and value creation strategies. An overarching conceptual figure maps the different research areas reviewed in the article and highlights the relationships between these research literatures. The reconceptualization and reframing of prior research advanced in this review promises to advance scholarship on patent strategy by illuminating its many links with the broader management field and by identifying opportunities to address important unanswered research questions. It thus provides a useful roadmap to help stimulate and guide future management research in this vital area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
(1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92196-5 · Cited by 11,976
The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view
Peteraf, M. A. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140303 · Cited by 10,716
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Teece, D. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,242
Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534454 · Cited by 3,772
The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250130505 · Cited by 3,392
Market value and patent citationsPreprint
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 3,341
Conner, K. R. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700109 · Cited by 3,084
Cited by
The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004 · Cited by 1,083
How can Blockchain technology support patent management? A systematic literature review
Denter, N. M., Seeger, F., & Moehrle, M. G. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102506 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Somaya, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-05-29
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1084-1114
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2046599362
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 34.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206312444447
- The paper
- Somaya, D. (2012). Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312444447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.