Cited by 64Intellectual Property and PatentsBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

How can Blockchain technology support patent management? A systematic literature review

Denter, Nils M., Seeger, Fabian, Moehrle, Martin G.·2023·International Journal of Information Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102506

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denter, N. M., Seeger, F., & Moehrle, M. G.
Affiliations
University of Bremen (DE)
Corresponding author
Denter, Nils M.
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
68
Pages
102506
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220836094
Cited by
64
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universität Bremen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, patent management, stakeholder theory, transaction cost economics, patent enforcement, patent exploitation, patent generation, uncertainty reduction, governance, business models, stakeholder collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review