The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceptions of Organizational Politics
Abstract
The political nature of work environments has been discussed for quite some time; however surprisingly little is known about the personal and situational factors that influence employees' perceptions of organizational politics. In this study, portions of a model of organizational politics perceptions proposed by Ferris, Russ, and Fandt (1989) were tested in two studies using samples reflecting considerable variability on jobs, age, sex, and education, as well as hierarchical level, across four different organizations. In Study 1, regression analyses, used to empirically examine a proposed model of organizational politics perceptions, demonstrated that feedback, job autonomy, skill variety, and opportunity for promotion contributed significantly to the explanation of variance in perceptions of organizational politics, after controlling for variance due to organization. In Study 2, a new expanded measure of organizational politics perceptions was used to provide a more refined analysis of the antecedents and consequences of politics perceptions. Directions for theoretical and empirical research on organizational politics are discussed in light of the present results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States.
Tullock, G., & Hirschman, A. O. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2325604 · Cited by 10,904
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392563 · Cited by 4,372
The Structuring of Organizations
Mintzberg, H. (1989) · Readings in Strategic Management · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_23 · Cited by 4,258
Principles of topological psychology.
Lewin, K. (1936) · McGraw-Hill eBooks · doi:10.1037/10019-000 · Cited by 3,927
Organization Theory and Design
Daft, R. L. (1983) · Cited by 3,853
(1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,559
Paroutis, S. (2015) · Wiley Encyclopedia of Management · doi:10.1002/9781118785317.weom120194 · Cited by 2,792
POLITICS OF STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING IN HIGH-VELOCITY ENVIRONMENTS: TOWARD A MIDRANGE THEORY.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256337 · Cited by 1,837
Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5 · Cited by 1,748
Cited by
Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 · Cited by 7,592
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory.
Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315575554 · Cited by 2,354
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311415280 · Cited by 1,625
Self-citationAuthentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda
Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007 · Cited by 1,340
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-116
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2100823815
- Cited by
- 834
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptions of Organizational Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/014920639201800107
- The paper
- Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of Organizational Politics. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
