CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Local Government Finance and DecentralizationLocal Governance and PlanningPublic Policy and Administration Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

City-County Consolidation and the Rebuilding of Image: The Fiscal Lessons from Indianapolis's UniGov Program

Rosentraub, Mark S.·2000·State and Local Government Review
DOI 10.1177/0160323x0003200303
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Regions that seek to manage rapid growth, as well as those that struggle to attract development, frequently create new governance systems. This article reviews Indianapolis's UniGov consolidation, which transferred responsibilities for economic developmen

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0160323x0003200303

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bartik Timothy, 1991, Who benefits from economic development?
  2. Blomquist William, 1995, Publius, 25, 37
  3. Hudnut William, 1995, The Hudnut years in Indianapolis, 1976–1991
  4. Kirch Robert V., 1973, Indiana Academy of Social Sciences Proceedings 3d series, 8, 133
  5. Kotler Philip, 1993, Marketing places
  6. 10.1177/109114219802600601 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/01944369708975915 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1525/9780520317024 · DOI
  9. Rosentraub Mark S., 1999, Major league losers: The real costs of sports and who's paying for it
  10. Rosentraub Mark S., 1994, City and suburbs: Linkages, benefits and responsibilities
  11. Rosentraub Mark S., 1996, Building the economic future of metropolitan Indianapolis: A proposal for regional cooperation and finance
  12. 10.1068/a301723 · DOI
  13. Walls J. W., 1999, Onward and upward: The story of the greater Indianapolis progress committee

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rosentraub, M. S.
Affiliations
Cleveland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosentraub, Mark S.
Venue
State and Local Government Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2000-12
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
180-191
ISSN
  • 0160-323X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3409
DOI
10.1177/0160323x0003200303
OpenAlex
W2047276228
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • State and Local Government Review (publishedVersion)
  • EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
city-county consolidation, Indianapolis, local government reform, economic development, rapid growth, regional governance, local government finance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review