Schools and Inequality: A Multilevel Analysis of Coleman's Equality of Educational Opportunity Data
Abstract
Background/Context The Equality of Educational Opportunity study is widely recognized as one of the most important studies on schooling ever performed. The findings from the report have shaped the field of education, national education policies, and wider public and scholarly opinion regarding the contributions of schools and schooling to equality and productivity in the United States. Despite past reanalyses of the data and decades of research on the effects of schools as organizations, the report's fundamental finding—that a student's family background is far more important than school social composition and school resources for understanding student outcomes—still retains much of its currency. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: Using the original Equality of Educational Opportunity data, this study replicated Coleman's statistical models but also applied a two-level hierarchical linear model (HLM) to measure the effects of school-level social composition, resources, teacher characteristics, and peer characteristics on ninth-grade students’ verbal achievement. Research Design HLM allows researchers to disentangle how schools and students’ family backgrounds contribute to learning outcomes. The methodology offers a clearer interpretation of the relative effects of school characteristics, including racial/ethnic composition, and family background, including race/ethnicity and social class, on students’ academic outcomes. Findings/Results Our results suggest t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The same HSGPA may signal stronger underlying preparation for students from better-resourced schools than for those from less advantaged schools, who may arrive at college with fewer supports despite equivalent grades.
“As a result, the same HSGPA may signal stronger underlying preparation for students from better-resourced schools than for those from less advantaged schools, who may arrive at college with fewer supports despite equivalent grades.”
From An Omitted Variables Approach to Disentangling Differential Prediction in College Admissions (2026) · cites this paper as Borman & Dowling, 2010
Cites
The "Grammar" of Schooling: Why Has it Been so Hard to Change?
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312031003453 · Cited by 1,169 · cited 2× · see citing works
“From building to building (Meyer & Rowan, 1978) and from decade to decade (Tyack & Tobin, 1994), many aspects of schooling remain remarkably similar and resistant to change.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decomposing School Resegregation: Social Closure, Racial Imbalance, and Racial Isolation
Fiel, J. E. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413496252 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
An Omitted Variables Approach to Disentangling Differential Prediction in College Admissions
Demeke, S., Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., & Lee, S. D. (2026) · Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.70048
- Authors
- Borman, G. D., & Dowling, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison
- ORCID
- Borman, Geoffrey D.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1201-1246
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W1513915378
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 93.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- school influence, educational inequality, school social composition, school resources, family background, racial and ethnic segregation, social class, teacher bias, educational tracking, verbal achievement, ninth grade students, African American students, poverty, variance decomposition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review