Cited by 160School Choice and PerformanceUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesCritical Race Theory in Education

Decomposing School Resegregation: Social Closure, Racial Imbalance, and Racial Isolation

Fiel, Jeremy E.·2013·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Today’s typical minority student attends school with fewer whites than his counterpart in 1970. This apparent resegregation of U.S. schools has sparked outrage and debate. Some blame a rollback of desegregation policies designed to distribute students more evenly among schools; others blame the changing racial composition of the student population. This study clarifies the link between distributive processes of segregation, population change, and school racial composition by framing school segregation as a mode of social closure. I use a novel decomposition approach to determine the relative contributions of distributive processes and compositional change in the apparent resegregation of schools from 1993 to 2010. For the most part, compositional changes are to blame for the declining presence of whites in minorities’ schools. During this period, whites and minorities actually became more evenly distributed across schools, helping increase minority students’ exposure to whites. Further decompositions reveal the continued success of district-level desegregation efforts, but the greatest barrier to progress appears to be the uneven distribution of students between school districts in the same area. These findings call for new research and new policies to address contemporary school segregation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122413496252

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fiel, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Fiel, Jeremy E.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2013-08-27
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
828-848
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2103136759
Cited by
160
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8
FWCI
62.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
school resegregation, school segregation, school racial composition, student population change, desegregation policy, social closure, decomposition analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review