The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Negative Consequences of Becoming a Good Reader: Identity Theory as a Lens for Understanding Struggling Readers, Teachers, and Reading Instruction
Abstract
Background/Context The majority of middle school students in U.S. schools are struggling readers and lack the reading abilities needed to successfully comprehend texts, complete reading-related assignments, and learn subject matter content. Researchers have suggested that struggling readers’ comprehension abilities can be improved if their subject-matter teachers provide them with appropriate skill and strategy instruction, as well as regular opportunities to read and discuss texts. However, struggling readers may choose not to apply the reading skills they have been taught and may approach reading tasks in ways that they know prevent them from learning content and that marginalize their abilities to grow as readers. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study The multiple case study presented here was intended to explore how middle school struggling readers and their content-area teachers made decisions about how to work with classroom reading tasks and each other over a period of one academic year. A case study approach allowed for the actions that took place to be closely documented. Theories of identity, including models of identity, identity capital, and discursive identity, framed the analysis for this study and were used to interpret the research questions. The research questions were: (1) How do middle school teachers interact with struggling readers in relation to the reading task demands of their classrooms? (2) How do middle school struggling readers interact with the reading task demands of their content-area classrooms? Setting This study took place in one sixth-grade social studies classroom, one seventh-grade mathematics classroom, and one eighth-grade science classroom. Population/Participants/Subjects The participants were: (a) Sarah and Mrs. O'Reilly in sixth grade, (b) Nicole and Mrs. Harding in seventh grade, and (c) Alisa and Mrs. Baker in eighth grade. Research Design This was a descriptive year-long multiple case study. Data sources included biweekly observations, questionnaires, interviews, and graded class work. Findings Teachers’ interactions with struggling readers were based on (a) their models of identity for what it meant to become a good reader and (b) the discursive identities they created for their students based on their models of identity. Students’ interactions with classroom reading tasks were based on (a) how they identified themselves as readers and (b) their goal to prevent their peers, teachers, or family members from constructing a discursive identity of them as poor readers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These studies indicate that when adolescents actually do identify themselves with identity positions that are stigmatized by their peers, they may hide that they do in order to safeguard their reputation.”
From The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Hall 2010
In the citing paper
“However, students shared in their questionnaires and interviews that they felt it was not really possible to engage in class as someone who is becoming a good reader. Students mentioned to fear the social consequences of engaging in class as such, because classmates jointly reinforced the norm that it is embarrassing to have reading difficulties. Therefore, as some of the students reported, they”
From The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Hall 2010
Citations
Cites
Review of research in education
Shulman, L. S., Mowry, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1973) · F.E. Peacock eBooks · Cited by 7,754
Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed)
Morse, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(96)00056-6 · Cited by 5,613
Stake, R. E. (2005) · Cited by 4,706
Chapter 3 : Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education
Gee, J. P. (2000) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x025001099 · Cited by 2,727
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988) · doi:10.4135/9781412985000 · Cited by 2,723
Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction.
Kotarba, J. A., & Gergen, K. J. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2077591 · Cited by 1,922
Outsiders: Studies in The Sociology of Deviance.
Sykes, G. M., & Becker, H. S. (1964) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094660 · Cited by 1,784
Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. R. (2008) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101 · Cited by 1,685
Rice, T. K. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced0983 · Cited by 1,656
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/0361-476x(83)90018-8 · Cited by 1,349
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Brozo W., 1991, Journal of Reading, 33, 324
- LeCompte M. D., 1993, Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research, second edition.
- Lin A. M., 2008, Problematizing identity: Everyday struggles in language, culture, and education, 199
- Moje E., 2007, Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power, 15
- National Assessment of Educational Progress., 2004, Long-term trend.
- National Assessment of Educational Progress., 2007, reading assessment results.
- O'BrienD. (2006). “Struggling” adolescents’ engagement in multimediating: Countering the institutional construction of incompetence. In AlvermannD. E., HinchmanK. A., MooreD. W., PhelpsS. F. & WaffD. R. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives (2nd ed., pp. 29–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Palinscar A. S., 2001, Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress, 152
- Reed J., 2004, Adolescent literacy research and practice, 251
- Ruddell M., 2002, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45, 352
- Skeggs B., 2008, Problematizing identity: Everyday struggles in language, culture, and education, 35
- TatumA. (2006). Adolescents’ multiple identities and teacher professional development. In AlvermannD. E., HinchmanK. A., MooreD. W., PhelpsS. F. & WaffD. R. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives (2nd ed., pp. 65–79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Wallbrown F., 1991, Reading Improvement, 18, 226
- Williams M., 2001, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 588
- WolcottH. (2005). The art of fieldwork (2nd ed.) New York: Altamira Press.
- YinR. (2002). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review
Verhoeven, M., Poorthuis, A. M. G., & Volman, M. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9457-3 · Cited by 318
“For example, Hall (2010) found — based on observations as well as teacher questionnaires and interviews — that the teachers of a middle school offered their students three different reader identity positions: one of a poor reader (someone who is unable to understand most of what he or she reads,…”
BackgroundFrom “What is Reading?” to What is Literacy?
Frankel, K. K., Becker, B. L. C., Rowe, M. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2016) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205741619600303 · Cited by 156
Hall, L. A., Johnson, A. S., Juzwik, M. M., Wortham, S. E. F., & Mosley, M. (2010) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.009 · Cited by 95
Self-citationDemir, E. K. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100391 · Cited by 89
Hall, L. A. (2012) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x12445370 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, L. A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Leigh A.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1792-1829
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W1883383473
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Keywords
- struggling readers, identity theory, discursive identity, identity capital, junior high school students, content teachers, reading instruction, teacher-student relationship, reading comprehension, social studies, mathematics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review