The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rethinking Reading Comprehension
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308325998 · Cited by 599
Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003 · Cited by 428
Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension
Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x · Cited by 325
The Role of Background Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348 · Cited by 326
Differential Competencies Contributing to Children's Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Texts
Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2008) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702710801963951 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- AKANBI, L.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2312-2315
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W3108935806
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking Reading Comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/016146812004106122312
- The paper
- AKANBI, L. (2004). Rethinking Reading Comprehension. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812004106122312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
