The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rethinking Reading Comprehension
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308325998 · Cited by 599
Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003 · Cited by 428
Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension
Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x · Cited by 325
The Role of Background Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348 · Cited by 326
Differential Competencies Contributing to Children's Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Texts
Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2008) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702710801963951 · Cited by 281
Gersten, R., Dimino, J., Jayanthi, M., Kim, J. S., & Santoro, L. E. (2010) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209361208 · Cited by 198
Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis
Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T. P., & Ta, C. P. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1 · Cited by 175
Scaffolding Students' Comprehension of Text
Clark, K. F., & Graves, M. F. (2005) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1598/rt.58.6.6 · Cited by 162
Pfost, M., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008 · Cited by 155
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011) · International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning · doi:10.1504/ijceell.2011.040197 · Cited by 103
Ignacio Madrid, R., Van Oostendorp, H., & Puerta Melguizo, M. C. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.005 · Cited by 99
McNaughton, S., Lai, M. K., & Hsiao, S. (2012) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.652126 · Cited by 77
Understanding changes in elementary Mandarin students’ L1 and L2 writing
McCarthey, S. J., Guo, Y.-H., & Cummins, S. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.003 · Cited by 51
Willits, J. A., Rubin, T., Jones, M. N., Minor, K. S., & Lysaker, P. H. (2018) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.014 · Cited by 46
An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development
Hou, J., Verspoor, M., & Loerts, H. (2016) · Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/dujal.5.1.04loe · Cited by 18
The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition
Wimmer, L., Currie, G., Friend, S., & Ferguson, H. J. (2021) · Scientific Study of Literature · doi:10.1075/ssol.21010.wim · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- AKANBI, L.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2312-2315
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W3108935806
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.