Cited by 10Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisEducation Discipline and InequalityCritical Race Theory in Education

“When You Carry a Lot”: The Forgotten Spaces of Youth Prison Schooling for Incarcerated Disabled Girls of Color

Cabral, Brian, Annamma, Subini Ancy, Morgan, Jamelia·2023·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Abstract

Context: The Crouse decision from 1838 laid precedent to the positioning of prisons as sites where education takes place. With a massive expansion of youth carceral facilities since then, alongside the prison-schools within them, we continually rely on prison-school spaces as places where youth are brought to experience education and punishment. While the wider population of youth who are incarcerated in the United States has significantly reduced since the year 2000, the reduction of incarcerated Girls of Color has not. Many incarcerated Girls of Color are also disabled. Thus, it is within this context that we explore the prison-school space as a site that is intended to provide robust educational opportunities. Focus of Study: In this article, we repositioned disabled incarcerated Girls of Color as knowledge generators and as experts well positioned to describe existing prison-school practices and alternatives to prison-school. Through the conceptual frames of forgotten places and the destructive practices within, we focused on the lived experiences of disabled incarcerated Girls of Color in SYRAD, a Midwestern maximum-security youth prison, to address our main research question: What are the education experiences of disabled Girls of Color in prison-schools? Research Design: Our qualitative study is part of a larger project that included 14 disabled incarcerated Girls of Color. Throughout the year, the girls were enrolled in a credit-bearing course with the principal inves…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01614681231181816

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One such youth carceral state configuration is in the United States, specifically the systems and structures of youth incarceration, pathologization, social control complex, and expulsions.

    “One such youth carceral state configuration also long documented is in the United States, specifically the systems and structures of youth incarceration, pathologization, social control complex, and expulsions (Annamma, 2017; Cabral et al., 2023; Rios, 2011; Rodríguez, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabral, B., Annamma, S. A., & Morgan, J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Cabral, Brian
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
2023-05
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
95-113
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W4380788490
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ford Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
prison schools, girls of color, juvenile detention, forgotten places, DisCrit, prison abolition, alternatives to imprisonment, decarceration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review