The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some Theoretical Issues Relating to Educational Evaluation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A few years later, Bloom [23] extended this idea to the classroom, emphasizing the use of ongoing assessment to diagnose student misunderstandings and tailor instruction to promote mastery learning.”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Debriefing as Formative Assessment: Closing Performance Gaps in Medical Education
Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Raemer, D. B., & Eppich, W. (2008) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x · Cited by 825
OECD (2010) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/9789264086487-en · Cited by 418
Formative Assessment: Getting the Focus Right
Wiliam, D. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2006.9652993 · Cited by 313
Su, J., Zhong, Y., & Ng, D. T. K. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100065 · Cited by 313
Technological Issues for Computer-Based Assessment
Csapó, B., Ainley, J., Bennett, R. E., Latour, T., & Law, N. W. Y. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_4 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloom, B. S.
- Corresponding author
- Bloom, Benjamin S.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1969-08
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 26-50
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W4210255027
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- educational assessment, evaluation theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
