The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feelings of Discontent and the Promise of Middle Range Theory for STS: Examples from Technology Dynamics
Open accessAbstract
This article critically discusses the state of STS, expressing feelings of discontent regarding four aspects: policy relevance, conceptual language, too much focus on complexity, theoretical styles. Middle range theory is proposed as an alternative, promising avenue. Middle range theories focus on delimited topics, make explicit efforts to combine concepts, and search for abstracted patterns and explanatory mechanisms. The article presents achievements in that direction for technology dynamics, particularly with regard to the role of expectations, niche theory and radical innovation, and the multi-level perspective on sociotechnical transitions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The explanatory focus of the theory, and its emphasis on human agency, sets it apart from sociological theories of actor-networks [12] that take ethnographic case studies at their primary method [13], wrongly attribute agency to things as well as people, and explicitly reject explanation in favour of description [11].”
From Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (2009) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Social Theory and Social Structure
Ross, E. J., & Merton, R. Κ. (1958) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709394 · Cited by 10,318
Mills, C. W. (1959) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1891592 · Cited by 8,892
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Self-citationAn evolutionary theory of economic change
Winter, & Sidney, G. (1982) · Cited by 6,343
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
Self-citationCarpenter, M. A., Cardon, M. S., McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849807630.00018 · Cited by 5,213
Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
Law, J. (1992) · Systems Practice · doi:10.1007/bf01059830 · Cited by 3,244
An evolutionary theory of economic change
Wright, G. (1982) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/0160-791x(82)90007-0 · Cited by 3,207
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537329808524310 · Cited by 2,867
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bijker, W.E., 1995, Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Towards a theory of sociotechnical change
- Flen, J., 2005, Gartner's hype cycle special report for 2005
- Geels, F.W., 2005, Management, 17, 445
- Kemp, R., 1998, Management, 10, 175
- Merton, R.K., 1948, American Sociological Review, 13, 164
- Misa, T.J. 1994. Retrieving sociotechnical change from technological determinism . In Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism, edited by M.R. Smith and L. Marx, 115—141. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- 10.4337/9781781005323 · DOI
- Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. Technological change. In Human choice and climate change, Volume 2, edited by S. Rayner and E.L. Malone, 327-399. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
- Van Driel, H., 2005, Culture, 46, 51
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms
Geels, F. W. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · Cited by 3,092
Self-citationAn agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Self-citationOntologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective
Geels, F. W. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 · Cited by 1,718
Self-citationDevelopment of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
May, C. R., Mair, F., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 · Cited by 1,409
Geels, F. W. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.010 · Cited by 437
Self-citationComparing technological hype cycles: Towards a theory
van Lente, H., Spitters, C., & Peine, A. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.004 · Cited by 334
Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions
Pel, B., Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Bauler, T., Kunze, I., Dorland, J., Wittmayer, J. M., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104080 · Cited by 394
Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development
Jørgensen, U. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001 · Cited by 307
Furlong, K. (2014) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.04.001 · Cited by 246
Hess, D. J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101462 · Cited by 241
The business of expectations: How promissory organizations shape technology and innovation
Pollock, N., & Williams, R. (2010) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312710362275 · Cited by 237
Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done?
May, C. R., Finch, T. L., Cornford, J., Exley, C., Gately, C., Kirk, S., Jenkings, K. N., Osbourne, J., Robinson, A. L., Rogers, A., et al. (2011) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-131 · Cited by 220
Sarasini, S., & Linder, M. (2017) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.09.004 · Cited by 199
Stirling, A. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101239 · Cited by 198
Sustainability transformations: socio-political shocks as opportunities for governance transitions
Herrfahrdt-Pähle, E., Schlüter, M., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Gelcich, S., & Pahl‐Wostl, C. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102097 · Cited by 207
Challenging obduracy: How local communities transform the energy system
van der Schoor, T., van Lente, H., Scholtens, B., & Peine, A. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.009 · Cited by 170
Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy in the Making: Assessing Developments in 9 OECD Cases
Schenuit, F., Colvin, R. M., Fridahl, M., McMullin, B., Reisinger, A. R., Sanchez, D. L., Smith, S. M., Torvanger, A., Wreford, A., & Geden, O. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.638805 · Cited by 164
Blockchain technology and supply chains: The paradox of the atheoretical research discourse
Zhu, Q., Bai, C. A., & Sarkis, J. (2022) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2022.102824 · Cited by 160
Supporting and practising digital innovation with advisers in smart farming
Ayre, M. L., Collum, V. M., Waters, W., Samson, P. R., Curro, A., Nettle, R. A., Paschen, J.-A., King, B., & Reichelt, N. (2019) · NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2019.05.001 · Cited by 126
System dynamics modelling and simulation for sociotechnical transitions research
Papachristos, G. (2018) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.10.001 · Cited by 135
Assembling Sustainable Smart City Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Theoretical Perspective
Mora, L., Deakin, M., Zhang, X., Batty, M., de Jong, M., Santi, P., & Appio, F. P. (2020) · Journal of Urban Technology · doi:10.1080/10630732.2020.1834831 · Cited by 88
Susur, E., Nuchera, A. H., & Chiaroni, D. (2018) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.002 · Cited by 85
Loet Leydesdorff, A., Alkemade, F., Heimeriks, G. J., & Hoekstra, R. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1447-8 · Cited by 81
Classifying fishers' behaviour. An invitation to fishing styles
Boonstra, W. J., & Hentati‐Sundberg, J. (2014) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12092 · Cited by 82
Haxeltine, A., Pel, B., de Bruxelles, U. L., Wittmayer, J. M., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., & Avelino, F. (2017) · European Public & Social Innovation Review · doi:10.31637/epsir.17-1.5 · Cited by 71
Towards multi-system sociotechnical transitions: why simulate
Papachristos, G. (2014) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2014.944148 · Cited by 68
A mechanism based transition research methodology: Bridging analytical approaches
Papachristos, G. (2018) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.02.006 · Cited by 65
Three case studies to explore relevant features of emerging renewable energy communities in Italy
Musolino, M., Maggio, G., D'Aleo, E., & Nicita, A. (2023) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.094 · Cited by 56
The Cultural Politics of ‘Implementation Science’
Boulton, R., Sandall, J., & Sevdalis, N. (2020) · Journal of Medical Humanities · doi:10.1007/s10912-020-09607-9 · Cited by 56
Pel, B., Raven, R. P. J. M., & van Est, R. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120244 · Cited by 58
Quantum technology hype and national security
Smith, F. L. (2020) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010620904922 · Cited by 62
A retroductive systems-based methodology for socio-technical transitions research
Papachristos, G., & Adamides, E. D. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.007 · Cited by 55
Why care about theories? Innovative ways of theorizing in sustainability science
Schlüter, M., Caniglia, G., Orach, K., Bodin, Ö., Magliocca, N., Meyfroidt, P., & Reyers, B. (2022) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101154 · Cited by 39
Phasing out an embedded technology: Insights from banning the incandescent light bulb in Europe
Koretsky, Z. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102310 · Cited by 44
Pilloni, M., Hamed, T. A., & Joyce, S. (2019) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101328 · Cited by 43
Pilot Society and the Energy Transition
Ryghaug, M., & Skjølsvold, T. M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61184-2 · Cited by 68
Ganowski, S., & Rowlands, I. H. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101709 · Cited by 45
Beaulieu, A., Scharnhorst, A., & Wouters, P. F. (2007) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907306188 · Cited by 39
Learning to find a way out of non-sustainable systems
Poeck, K. V., & Östman, L. (2021) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.04.001 · Cited by 37
Process supporting strategic decision-making in systemic transitions
Auvinen, H., Ruutu, S., Tuominen, A., Ahlqvist, T., & Oksanen, J. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.011 · Cited by 36
Mehling, S., & Kolleck, N. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11184982 · Cited by 40
Governance of interactions between infrastructure sectors: The making of smart grids in the UK
Hiteva, R. P., & Watson, J. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.006 · Cited by 33
In search of a network theory of innovations: Relations, positions, and perspectives
Loet Leydesdorff, A., & Ahrweiler, P. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23127 · Cited by 33
Jensen, C. B. (2013) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243913502866 · Cited by 32
On Theory–Methods Packages in Science and Technology Studies
Silvast, A., & Virtanen, M. J. (2021) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439211040241 · Cited by 32
Koretsky, Z., Stegmaier, P., Turnheim, B., & van Lente, H. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003213642 · Cited by 45
Revitalizing comparative library and information science: theory and metatheory
Lor, P. J. (2013) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-10-2012-0129 · Cited by 31
A winding road: transition management, policy change and the search for sustainable development
Paredis, E. (2013) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 31
Niche politics: Biogas, technological flexibility and the economisation of resource recovery
Lazarevic, D., & Valve, H. (2020) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.016 · Cited by 29
Towards a TSI theory: a relational framework and 12 propositions
Haxeltine, A., Pel, B., Dumitru, A., Avelino, F., Kemp, R., Bauler, T., Kunze, I., Dorland, J., Wittmayer, J. M., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2017) · Cited by 27
Papachristos, G., Papadonikolaki, E., & Morgan, B. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102967 · Cited by 31
Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2020) · Economics of Innovation and New Technology · doi:10.1080/10438599.2020.1719640 · Cited by 27
Three Decades of Social Construction of Technology: Dynamic Yet Fuzzy? The Methodological Conundrum
Basu, S. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2120783 · Cited by 38
A dynamic and multifunctional account of middle‐range theories
Kaidesoja, T. (2018) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12621 · Cited by 31
Ryan, T. L., Ryan, N., & Hynes, B. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11866-4 · Cited by 24
The Rise of Accelerated Energy Innovation and its Implications for Sustainable Innovation Studies´
Winskel, M., & Radcliffe, J. W. (2014) · Science & Technology Studies · doi:10.23987/sts.55332 · Cited by 23
Velden, T., & Lagoze, C. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22929 · Cited by 22
Theories of Uncertainty Communication: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review
Lammers, W., Ferrari, S., Wenmackers, S., Pattyn, V., & de Walle, S. V. (2024) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470241231290 · Cited by 23
Governed by history: institutional analysis of a contested biofuel innovation system in Tanzania
Arora, S., Romijn, H., & Caniëls, M. C. J. (2013) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtt017 · Cited by 19
MacRae, R. J., & Winfield, M. (2016) · Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l alimentation · doi:10.15353/cfs-rcea.v3i1.60 · Cited by 15
Dynamics of technological decline as socio-material unravelling
Koretsky, Z. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003213642-2 · Cited by 17
Avoiding Irrelevance: The manifestation and impacts of technophobia in psychological sciencePreprint
Davidson, B. I., Ellis, D. A., Bowman, N. D., Liveley, G., Shaw, H., Przybylski, A. K., & Levine, M. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/b9f4p · Cited by 18
Joveniaux, A., Legrand, M., Esculier, F., & GOUVELLO, B. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.976624 · Cited by 16
Transition ‘backlash’: Towards explanation, governance and critical understanding
Pel, B. (2021) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.016 · Cited by 16
Lee, J., Kim, K., Kim, J., & Hwang, J. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102327 · Cited by 15
Architecting technology transitions: A sustainability‐oriented sociotechnical approach
Davis, K., Mazzuchi, T. A., & Sarkani, S. (2012) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21226 · Cited by 15
Assembling Sustainable Smart City Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Theoretical Perspective
Mora, L., Deakin, M., Zhang, X., Batty, M., de Jong, M., Santi, P., & Appio, F. P. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003205722-1 · Cited by 14
Critical sustainability science: advancing sustainability transformations
Longo, S. B., Isgren, E., & Carolan, M. (2025) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-025-01667-x · Cited by 17
Sustainable consumption, energy and failed transitions: the problem of adaptation
Hess, D. J. (2013) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781781001349.00018 · Cited by 13
Exploring indicators for monitoring sociotechnical system transitions through portfolio networks
Penna, C., Romero‐Goyeneche, O. Y., & Matti, C. (2023) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scad015 · Cited by 15
Politics of expectations: Nature, culture and the production of space
Porter, J. J., & Randalls, S. (2014) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.016 · Cited by 12
Toikka, A. (2011) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 10
Mapping ‘the ANT multiple’: A comparative, critical and reflexive analysis
Kanger, L. (2017) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/jtsb.12141 · Cited by 12
Raven, R. P. J. M., Lindsay, J., Lane, R., & Reynolds, D. (2024) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2024.100893 · Cited by 8
Heitor, M. V., Horta, H., Castañón, R., Sbragia, R., & Jiménez, A. (2014) · Journal of technology management & innovation · doi:10.4067/s0718-27242014000400001 · Cited by 8
A meta‐analysis of SES framework case studies: Identifying dyad and triad archetypes
Partelow, S., Villamayor‐Tomás, S., Eisenack, K., Epstein, G., Kellner, E., Roggero, M., & Tschopp, M. (2024) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.10630 · Cited by 8
Interventional STS: A Framework for Developing Workable Technologies
Lyle, K. (2020) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.1177/1360780420915723 · Cited by 7
Modelamiento semántico con Dinámica de Sistemas en el proceso de desarrollo de software
Vicente, R. (2012) · RISTI - Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação · doi:10.4304/risti.10.19-34 · Cited by 6
Pope, C. J., Turnbull, J. C., Halford, S., Pritchard, J., Calestani, M., Salisbury, C., May, C. R., Barrett, C., & Lattimer, V. (2011) · Research Repository (Kingston University London) · Cited by 6
Arponen, V. P. J., Grimm, S. B., Käppel, L., Ott, K., Thalheim, B., Kropp, Y. O., Kittig, K., Brinkmann, J., & Ribeiro, A. (2019) · The Holocene · doi:10.1177/0959683619857226 · Cited by 6
Social science perspectives on energy transitions
Maassen, A. (2009) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy · doi:10.1680/ener.2009.162.4.161 · Cited by 6
Traversing Technology Trajectories
Klaessig, F. C. (2021) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-021-00398-4 · Cited by 5
Koretsky, Z., Zeiss, R., & van Lente, H. (2022) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439221130139 · Cited by 5
Building middle-range theories using case studies in hospitality management
Khan, M. H. (2023) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103584 · Cited by 4
Transforming Society Through Pilot and Demonstration Projects
Ryghaug, M., & Skjølsvold, T. M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61184-2_1 · Cited by 4
Taanman, M. (2014) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 5
Digital twin application in healthcare facilities management
Ebiloma, D. O., Aigbavboa, C. O., & Anumba, C. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34226-4.00014-9 · Cited by 3
Vaskelainen, T., Bidmon, C., & Punt, M. B. (2025) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2025.101001 · Cited by 3
Policy-Making and Public Management
Asquer, A., & Mele, V. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_27 · Cited by 5
Leveraging natural language processing to bridge divides in sustainable transitions research
Herman, K. S. (2024) · Sustainable Environment · doi:10.1080/27658511.2024.2424065 · Cited by 2
Sistemas sociotécnicos, innovación y desarrollo.
Lepratte, L. (2011) · Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) · Cited by 2
Loet Leydesdorff, A., Alkemade, F., Heimeriks, G. J., & Hoekstra, R. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
McGrail, S. (2011) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 2
A Comparative UK-German Study of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Innovative Activity
Hacking, N. (2017) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.10356.96646 · Cited by 2
Megaprojects as Niches of Sociotechnical Transitions: The Case of Digitalization in UK ConstructionPreprint
Papadonikolaki, E., Morgan, B., & Papachristos, G. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4145306 · Cited by 31
Making a difference? Nanotechnology and the quest for Responsible Innovation
Walhout, B. (2023) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036558778 · Cited by 2
Des pratiques d’ingénierie aux transitions sociotechniques
Hubert, M., & Vinck, D. (2014) · Revue d anthropologie des connaissances · doi:10.3917/rac.023.0361 · Cited by 1
Tracing democratic innovations: A longitudinal perspective on a food policy council
Andreola, M., Forno, F., & Giovannini, M. (2025) · Environment and Planning C Politics and Space · doi:10.1177/23996544251369249 · Cited by 1
Pel, B., Debourdeau, A., Kemp, R., Schmid, B., Vadovics, E., Markantoni, M., Dumitru, A., Bornemann, B., Schäfer, M., Rau, H. G., et al. (2026) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2026.104862 · Cited by 1
Lepratte, L. (2014) · Journal of technology management & innovation · doi:10.4067/s0718-27242014000400006 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Geels, F. W.
- Affiliations
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Geels, Frank W.
- ORCID
- Geels, Frank W.
- Venue
- Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 627-651
- ISSN
- 0162-2439 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8251
- OpenAlex
- W2111912601
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Science Technology & Human Values (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Keywords
- middle-range theory, science and technology studies, policy relevance, conceptual language, complexity, technological dynamics, expectations, niche theory, radical innovation, multi-level perspective, socio-technical transitions, explanatory mechanisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review