Cited by 1,718Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingInnovation, Technology, and Society

Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective

Open access
Geels, Frank W.·2010·Research Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 127 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Socio-technical transitions to sustainability do not come about easily because existing energy, transport, housing and agri-food systems are stabilized by lock-in mechanisms related to sunk investments, behavioural patterns, vested interests, infrastructure, favourable subsidies and regulations.

    “Socio-technical transitions to sustainability do not come about easily, because existing energy, transport, housing and agri-food systems are stabilized by lock-in mechanisms that relate to sunk investments, behavioural patterns, vested interests, infrastructure, favourable subsidies and regulations (Unruh, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Unruh, 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Responses to new environmental problems require more substantive transitions in energy, transport, and agri-food systems in the coming decades.

    “responses to the new environmental problems require more substantive 'transitions' in the coming decades, i.e. major changes in energy, transport, and agri-food systems (Elzen et al., 2004;Wiskerke and Van der Ploeg, 2004;Van den Bergh and Bruinsma, 2008; see also the papers in this special issue).1”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Elzen et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wiskerke and Van der Ploeg, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Van den Bergh and Bruinsma, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Radical innovations emerge in niches, where dedicated actors nurture alignment and development on multiple dimensions to create configurations that work.

    “Radical innovations emerge in niches, where dedicated actors nurture alignment and development on multiple dimensions to create 'configurations that work' (Rip and Kemp, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rip and Kemp, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationnone given

    The multi-level perspective is a middle-range theory that makes crossovers to some social science ontologies and not to others, rather than a grand or unifying theory.

    “The MLP is characterized not as a grand or unifying theory, but as a middle range theory that makes crossovers to some ontologies and not to others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Ontologies postulate a certain causal agent and primary causal mechanism.

    “Ontologies postulate a certain causal agent and primary causal mechanism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 185
  • May combine two claims. 104
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The three levels of the multi-level perspective refer to heterogeneous configurations of increasing stability.

    “These 'levels' refer to heterogeneous configurations of increasing stability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Subsequent struggles between niches and regimes, and possible replacement, take place on multiple dimensions and are enacted by interpretive actors that fight, negotiate, search, learn, and build coalitions.

    “Subsequent struggles between niches and regimes, and possible replacement, take place on multiple dimensions (e.g.markets, regulations, cultural meanings, infrastructure) and are enacted by interpretive actors that fight, negotiate, search, learn, and build coalitions as they navigate transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The multi-level perspective distinguishes three analytical levels: niches, socio-technical regimes, and an exogenous socio-technical landscape.

    “The MLP distinguishes three analytical levels: niches (the locus for radical innovations), socio-technical regimes, which are locked in and stabilized on several dimensions, and an exogenous socio-technical landscape.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    The multi-level perspective proposes that transitions, defined as regime shifts, come about through interacting processes within and between the three levels.

    “The MLP proposes that transitions, which are defined as regime shifts, come about through interacting processes within and between these levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Transitions do not come about easily because existing regimes are characterized by lock-in and path dependence and are oriented towards incremental innovation along predictable trajectories.

    “Transitions do not come about easily, because existing regimes are characterized by lock-in and path dependence, and oriented towards incremental innovation along predictable trajectories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Niche-innovations may break through more widely if external landscape developments create pressures on the regime that lead to cracks, tensions and windows of opportunity.

    “These niche-innovations may break through more widely if external landscape developments create pressures on the regime that lead to cracks, tensions and windows of opportunity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Smith et al. (2005) argued that the multi-level perspective could pay more attention to agency and the role of power in socio-technical transitions.

    “Smith et al. (2005) argued that the MLP could pay more attention to agency and the role of power in socio-technical transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al. (2005)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The multi-level perspective is a framework for understanding sustainability transitions that provides an overall view of the multi-dimensional complexity of changes in socio-technical systems.

    “The multi-level perspective (Rip and Kemp, 1998;Geels, 2002;Geels, 2004;Geels and Schot, 2007) is a framework for understanding sustainability transitions that provides an overall view of the multi-dimensional complexity of changes in socio-technical systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rip and Kemp, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Geels, 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Geels, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It cannot be taken for granted that all social theories can or should be incorporated into the multi-level perspective.

    “While some of these theories may suggest areas for extension of the MLP, it cannot be taken for granted that all theories can or should be incorporated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Shove and Walker did not explicate which systemic theories of change they had in mind.

    “Unfortunately, they did not explicate which systemic theories of change they had in mind (the Shove and Walker paper in this special issue advocates practice theories).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Neo-classical economics conceptualizes transitions as changes in economic structure driven by changing prices of production factors and outputs, in response to which firms change investment strategies and consumers change purchase decisions.

    “Neo-classical economics conceptualizes transitions as changes in the economic structure (e.g. the shift from labour to capital), which are driven by changing prices of production factors and outputs, in response to which firms change their investment strategies and consumers change their purchase decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The Freeman and Perez approach has been criticized for technological determinism because of the suggested causality that techno-economic forces do the initial acting and the socio-institutional framework the subsequent reacting.

    “The Freeman and Perez (1988) approach has been criticized for technological determinism, because of the suggested causality that techno-economic forces do the initial acting and the socio-institutional framework the subsequent reacting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Freeman and Perez (1988)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Performance feedback, often via market selection, ultimately determines which innovations are retained and stored in the firm's routines.

    “Performance feedback, often via market selection, ultimately determines which innovations are retained and stored in the firm's routines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The strategy literature sees sustainability transitions as strategic dilemmas for firms, who have to balance the risks and opportunities associated with investments.

    “The strategy literature sees sustainability transitions as strategic dilemmas for firms, who have to balance the risks and opportunities associated with (sometimes multi-million dollar) investments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Section 3 positions the multi-level perspective as a crossover approach between evolution theory and interpretivism.

    “Section 3 addresses the second question and positions the MLP as a crossover approach between evolution theory and interpretivism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The relationship between the multi-level perspective and relationism is ambiguous, hovering between inspiration and problems.

    “The relationship with relationism is ambiguous, hovering between inspiration and problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shove and Walker (2007) argue for loosening the intellectual grip of innovation studies, backing off from the nested hierarchical multi-level model as the only model, and exploring other social scientific and systemic theories of change.

    “Shove and Walker (2007: 768), for instance, argue for “loosening the intellectual grip of 'innovation studies', for backing off from the nested, hierarchical multi-level model as the only model in town, and for exploring other social scientific, but also systemic theories of change” (italics in original, FG).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shove and Walker (2007)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Micro-evolution deals with the mechanisms of variation, selection and retention that underlie genealogical lineages.

    “Micro-evolution deals with the mechanisms of variation, selection and retention that underlie genealogical lineages (trajectories).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    It may be rational to postpone green investments because of future uncertainties in government regulations, price fluctuations, willingness to pay for green products, and the emergence of green markets.

    “On the one hand, it may be rational to postpone 'green' invest-ments because of future uncertainties in government regulations, price fluctuations, the degree to which environmental concerns translate into a willingness to pay more for green products, and the emergence of 'green' markets (Rugman and Verbeke, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rugman and Verbeke, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The multi-level perspective is not the only approach that makes crossovers between ontologies.

    “While Section 3 discusses how the MLP makes crossovers to various ontologies, I thus recognize that the MLP is not the only approach that does so.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The multi-level perspective can be fruitfully extended with insights from structuralism and power theories.

    “It further argues that the MLP makes no crossovers to rational choice and functionalism, and can be fruitfully extended with insights from structuralism and power theories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Technoeconomic paradigms refer to configurations of pervasive technologies, methods of production, economic structures, institutions and beliefs that are stable for long periods because certain key factors offer great benefits.

    “TEPs refer to configurations of pervasive technologies, methods of production, economic structures, institutions and beliefs that are stable for long periods because certain 'key factors' offer great benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Incumbent firms may successfully defend their strategic positions when they possess relevant complementary assets such as specialized manufacturing capability, experience with large-scale test trials, access to distribution channels, service networks, or complementary technologies.

    “Other strategy scholars suggest, however, that incumbent firms may successfully defend their strategic positions when they possess relevant complementary assets such as specialized manufacturing capability, experience with large-scale test trials, access to distribution channels, service networks, or complementary technologies (Tripsas, 1997;Rothaermel, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Tripsas, 1997 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rothaermel, 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Green technology leaders may benefit from first mover advantages such as brand recognition, creation of market positions, technology lead, and creation of patent barriers.

    “On the other hand, 'green' technology leaders may benefit from first mover advantages (such as brand recognition, creation of market positions, technology lead, creation of patent barriers) that create favourable positions in future 'green' innovation races.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    To stimulate transitions in sustainable directions, neo-classical economists argue that the conditions under which markets operate should be changed.

    “To stimulate transitions in sustainable directions, neo-classical economists therefore argue that the conditions under which the markets operate should be changed (Butter and Hofkes, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Butter and Hofkes, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Neo-classical economics conceptualizes transitions as gradual adjustment to changing prices.

    “In sum, neo-classical economics conceptualizes transitions as gradual adjustment to changing prices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The core drivers for transitions are radical innovations that emerge endogenously from the economic system by entrepreneurial action and lead to creative destruction.

    “The core drivers for such transitions are radical innovations, which emerge endogenously from the economic system by entrepreneurial action, and lead to creative destruction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    New technologies emerging in particular sectors initially face a degree of mismatch between the techno-economic subsystem and the old socio-institutional framework.

    “New technologies, which emerge in particular sectors, initially face “a degree of mismatch between the techno-economic sub-system and the old socio-institutional framework” (p.59).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Evolutionary economics since the 1980s focused more specifically on the role of technical change and innovation in firm- and industry-level competition.

    “While Schumpeter was interested in broad socio-economic change, evolutionary economics since the 1980s focused more specifically on the role of technical change and innovation in firmand industry-level competition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In rational choice, causal agents are self-interested, utilitarian individuals who use instrumental rationality to choose the course of action that maximizes utility with regard to their material preferences, which are considered fixed and given.

    “The causal agents in rational choice are self-interested, utilitarian individuals who use instrumental rationality as mechanism to choose the course of action that maximizes utility with regard to their (material) preferences, which are considered fixed and given.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Innovation studies is well placed to address sustainability transitions, but may also require some conceptual broadening to address the normativity and directionality of these transitions.

    “ity transitions, but may also require some conceptual broadening to address the normativity and directionality of these transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Rational choice assumes actors choose between alternatives that readily exist as a given choice-set and have full and free information about alternatives and consequences.

    “Actors choose between alternatives that are assumed to readily exist (as a given choice-set).Actors are further assumed to have full and free information about the alternatives and the consequences of their choices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Following an evolutionary logic, the process consists of interactions between changes on the variation side and in the selection environment.

    “Following an evolutionary logic, the process consists of interactions between changes on the variation side (R&D investments, competence building, knowledge flows, price/performance improvements in 'green' technologies) and in the selection environment (e.g.stricter environmental regulations or changes in user preferences).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    The suggestions for extending the multi-level perspective come from very different social theory traditions with different ontological assumptions about causal agents and causal mechanisms.

    “These suggestions come from very different social theory traditions, with different ontological assumptions about causal agents and causal mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In evolutionary economics, actors are boundedly rational because of information processing limitations and use routines, heuristics, and standard operating procedures in decision-making and problem solving.

    “The conceptualization of agents builds on the behavioral theory of the firm (Cyert and March, 1963), in which actors are boundedly rational, because of information processing limitations.Actors therefore use routines, heuristics, standard operating procedures in decisionmaking and day-to-day problem solving.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cyert and March, 1963

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Freeman and Louçã refined the approach by distinguishing five equally important subsystems: science, technology, economy, politics and culture.

    “Freeman and Louc ¸ȃ (2001) therefore refined the approach by distinguishing five equally important 'sub-systems': science, technology, economy, politics and culture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Freeman and Louc ¸ȃ (2001)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Novelties and radical innovations emerge endogenously through speciation, niches and entrepreneurship.

    “It argues that novelties and radical innovations emerge endogenously through speciation, niches and entrepreneurship (Cattani, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cattani, 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A broader approach to transitions focuses on shifts in technoeconomic paradigms that span the entire economy.

    “A broader approach to transitions focuses on shifts in technoeconomic paradigms (TEP) that span the entire economy (Freeman and Perez, 1988).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Freeman and Perez, 1988

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In a neo-classical view, environmental problems are caused by market failures because producers cause negative externalities not reflected in price, and by the public good character of a clean environment.

    “In a neo-classical view environmental problems are caused by market failures, because producers are causing negative effects (externalities) that are not reflected in the price, and by the public good character of a clean environment (which leads to 'free rider' effects that limit 'green' investments).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Work on green techno-economic paradigms emphasises the green potential of the ICT paradigm for energy and material savings in existing products and production processes.

    “Work on 'green' techno-economic paradigms (Freeman, 1992) emphasises the 'green' potential of the ICT-paradigm for energy and material savings in existing products and production processes (e.g.better monitoring and control, miniaturization, teleworking, teleconferencing).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Freeman, 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Attackers are thought to have advantages because they are more agile and flexible in responding to new technologies than incumbent firms for whom initial small markets do not generate enough profits and return-on-investment.

    “Attackers are thought to have advantages because they are more agile and flexible in responding to new technologies than incumbent firms for whom the initial small markets do not generate enough profits and return-on-investment (Foster, 1986;Christensen, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Foster, 1986

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Christensen, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Firms are adaptive agents that engage in problemistic search to find solutions to problems, and search processes such as R&D are guided by routines such as search heuristics and resource allocation routines.

    “Firms are adaptive agents that engage in problemistic search to find solutions to these problems.Search processes such as R&D, which generate innovations, are also guided by routines such as search heuristics and resource allocation routines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In technological discontinuity approaches, transitions towards sustainability are driven by the development of green technologies.

    “In technological discontinuity approaches, transitions towards sustainability are driven by the development of 'green' technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The positioning school addresses transitions in terms of new entrants and new technologies that contest the positions of existing firms and technologies.

    “The positioning school, especially as developed in some of the industrial organization literature, addresses transitions in terms of new entrants and new technologies that contest the positions of existing firms and technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The strategy planning school has little to say about transitions because it assumes stable conditions where plans can be made and administered.

    “The strategy planning school has little to say about transitions, because it assumes stable conditions where plans can be made and administered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Neo-classical economics is the main exemplar of rational choice, focusing on rational resource allocation decisions under conditions of scarcity.

    “Neo-classical economics is the main exemplar, focusing on rational resource allocation decisions under conditions of scarcity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Micro-evolution conceptualizes change as incremental adaptation that proceeds through trial-and-error and behavioural learning.

    “Micro-evolution thus conceptualizes change as incremental adaptation, which proceeds through trial-and-error and behavioural learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Because socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena, they can be studied from various angles by different disciplines.

    “Because socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena, they can be studied from various angles by different disciplines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Firms that have a green lead may convince policy makers to issue stricter regulations and thus impose imitation costs on competitors.

    “Firms that have a 'green' lead may also convince policy makers to issue stricter regulations and thus impose 'imitation costs' on competitors (Puller, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Puller, 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Not all of the seven ontologies explicitly address sustainability or transitions in their entire socio-technical complexity.

    “One qualifier is that not all of these ontologies explicitly address sustainability or transitions in their entire socio-technical complexity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Schumpeter argued that economic evolution is lopsided, discontinuous, disharmonious, studded with violent outbursts and catastrophes, and more like a series of explosions than a gentle transformation.

    “Criticizing the gradual adjustment view of neo-classical economics, Schumpeter (1939), for instance, argued that economic “evolution is lopsided, discontinuous, disharmonious by nature. . .studded with violent outbursts and catastrophes. . .more like a series of explosions than a gentle, though incessant, transformation” (p.102).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schumpeter (1939)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Causal mechanisms in ontologies are empirically underspecified, exist outside specific spatial and temporal boundaries, and cannot be directly observed.

    ““These mechanisms are empirically underspecified, exist outside specific spatial and temporal boundaries, and cannot be directly observed.(. ..) they are treated as ontologically primitive causes of outcomes and associations” (Mahoney, 2004: 461).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mahoney, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Search tends to be close to existing routines, localized and incremental, and actors satisfice rather than optimize.

    “Search tends to be close to existing routines, localized and incremental: “the probability distribution of what is found is concentrated on techniques close to the current one” (Nelson and Winter, 1982: 211).This means that actors do not optimize, but satisfice: they do not explore the whole search space, but stop searching when they find an alternative that seems satisfactory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nelson and Winter, 1982

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In evolution theory, the causal agent is a population of heterogeneous agents.

    “The causal agent in evolution theory is a population of heterogeneous agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Macro-evolution deals with long-term change patterns such as transformation, speciation, ecological invasion, punctuation and extinction.

    “Macro-evolution deals with long-term change patterns such as transformation, speciation, ecological invasion, punctuation and extinction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Markard and Truffer (2008) argued that incorporation of the technological innovation systems approach into the multi-level perspective might result in an overarching conceptualization and encompassing theoretical framework of socio-technical change.

    “Markard and Truffer (2008) argued that incorporation of the technological innovation systems (TIS) approach into the MLP might result in an “overarching conceptualization” and “encompassing theoretical framework of socio-technical change” (p.612).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Markard and Truffer (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Major mal-adjustments between subsystem dynamics lead to economic crises and opportunities for the breakthrough of major innovations and new technoeconomic paradigms.

    “Major mal-adjustments between sub-system dynamics lead to economic crises and opportunities for the breakthrough of major innovations and new TEPs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Parsons distinguished four core functions (AGIL) needed for stable continuation: Adaptation, Goal-attainment, Integration, and Latency.

    “For general social systems Parsons (1951) distinguished four core functions (AGIL) that need fulfilment to maintain stable continuation: (1) Adaptation: interaction with nature and produce commodities, (2) Goal-attainment: setting goals and implementing appropriate decisions, (3) Integration: creation of harmony and convergence through shared values and norms, (4) Latency: pattern maintenance over”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Parsons, 1951

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shifts in belief systems, ideologies and public opinion influence consumer preferences and values and create credibility pressure on and legitimacy for policy makers to introduce strict regulations.

    “Such shifts not only influence consumer preferences and values but also create credibility pressure on and legitimacy for policy makers to introduce strict regulations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Transition management advocates suggest that convergence can be facilitated through participatory visioning exercises, multistakeholder learning processes, and societal debates.

    “Transition management advocates (Rotmans et al., 2001) suggest that this process can be facilitated through participatory visioning exercises, multistakeholder learning processes, and societal debates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rotmans et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Complex systems theory conceptualizes transitions as punctuated equilibria, shifts from one dynamically stable state to another.

    “Complex systems theory conceptualizes transitions as punctuated equilibria, shifts from one dynamically stable state to another (Holland, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holland, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    Realization of change also requires spillovers to other domains such as politics and economics.

    “While this suggestion resonates with structuralism, which argues that large-scale changes start with new ideas, ideologies and discourses, it also indicates that realization of change also requires spillovers to other domains (e.g.politics, economics).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Neo-functionalists developed more dynamic frameworks that allow more agency and include crossovers to interpretivism, structuralism, and conflict theories.

    “Neo-functionalists therefore developed more dynamic frameworks that allow more agency and include crossovers to interpretivism, structuralism and conflict theories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In the 1960s and 1970s, Parsons's structural-functionalism was criticized for reification, teleology, an over-socialized view of actors, and a bias towards consensus and stability.

    “In the 1960s and 1970s, Parson's structural-functionalism was criticized for reification, teleology, an over-socialized view of actors, and a bias towards consensus and stability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While early theorists emphasised isomorphism, conformity and stability, institutional scholars have also begun to investigate variety, change and strategic responses to institutional pressures.

    “While early theorists emphasised isomorphism, conformity and stability, institutional scholars have also begun to investigate variety, change and strategic responses to institutional pressures (Greenwood and Hinings, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Greenwood and Hinings, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dynamic system theories emerged from the natural and technical sciences, including system dynamics, integrated systems theory, soft systems approaches, and complex systems theory.

    “Dynamic system theories also emerged from the natural and technical sciences, e.g.system dynamics, integrated systems theory, soft systems approaches and complex systems theory (Holland, 1995;Kauffman, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Holland, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kauffman, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Structural anthropology aims to uncover the cultural deep grammar made up of binary opposites.

    “One examplar is structural anthropology, which aims to uncover the cultural 'deep grammar' made up of 'binary' opposites (Lévi-Strauss, 1963).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lévi-Strauss, 1963

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Morel and Ramanujam characterize complexity theory as a heterogeneous ensemble of exciting observations that need further operationalization beyond metaphors for broader application in the social domain.

    “Morel and Ramanujam (1999) therefore characterize complexity theory as a heterogeneous ensemble of exciting observations, which, however, need further operationalization beyond the metaphors for broader application in the social domain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Morel and Ramanujam, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such a shift would require greater urgency about new environmental problems and widespread beliefs that radical green innovations are feasible and desirable.

    “such a shift would require a greater sense of urgency about the new environmental problems and widespread beliefs that radical 'green' innovations are feasible and desirable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Functionalism's causal agent is the social system, and its causal mechanism is the fulfillment of system needs/goals by actors who fulfill functions, tasks, or roles.

    “The causal agent in functionalism is the social system.The causal mechanism is the fulfillment of system needs/goals by actors who fulfil functions, tasks or roles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evolutionary theory assumes bounded rationality, while interpretivism focuses on intersubjective sense-making and symbolic constructions of reality.

    “While evolutionary theory assumes 'bounded rationality' (based on information processing limitations), interpretivism/constructivism focuses on intersubjective sense-making and symbolic constructions of reality through which people create shared interpretations (Berger and Luckman, 1967).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berger and Luckman, 1967

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is not one green innovation around which opinions coalesce; instead there are multiple green options appraised differently by various social groups.

    “There is not one 'green' innovation around which opinions coalesce.Instead, there are multiple 'green' options, which are appraised differently by various social groups.6”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Functionalism tends to assume a top-down cockpit view with benevolent leaders and experts adjusting systems in appropriate directions (technocracy).

    “Functionalism thus tends to assume a top-down 'cockpit' view with benevolent leaders and experts adjusting systems in appropriate directions (technocracy).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Giddens's structuration theory defines structures as rules and resources and sees actors as knowledgeable agents who interpret and tailor rules to specific contexts.

    “Giddens's (1984) structuration theory is an interpretive approach that makes crossovers to structural ontologies, defining structures somewhat abstractly as 'rules and resources'.Actors are seen as knowledgable agents who actively draw upon rules in concrete interactions.They interpret and tailor rules to the demands of specific contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Giddens, 1984

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SCOT argues that social groups attach different meanings to new technologies, leading to clashing opinions and debates that create uncertainty and prevent full commitments.

    “The social construction of technology (SCOT) approach, for instance, argues that social groups attach different meanings to new technologies (Bijker, 1995), leading to clashing opinions and heated debates, which create uncertainty and prevent full commitments from policy makers, consumers, and investors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bijker, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Freeman highlights the importance of long-term policy frameworks, high-level government support, long-term technology programs with a variety of participants, and strong support of public opinion.

    “Although he does not spell out the dynamics of these green system innovations, Freeman does highlight the importance of long-term policy frameworks, highlevel government support, long-term technology programs with a variety of participants, and strong support of public opinion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    In structuralism, cognitive deep structures are the causal agents, operating behind the backs of individual actors and defining what is desirable, acceptable and legitimate.

    “These cognitive 'deep structures' are therefore the causal agents, operating 'behind the backs' of individual actors and defining what is desirable, acceptable and legitimate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Structuration theory maintains active interpretive dynamics while actors are embedded in rules.

    “While actors are seen as embedded in rules, structuration theory thus maintains active and interpretive dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Sustainability transitions may require a shift from the dominant neo-liberal/globalization agenda to a sustainable development/social transformation agenda.

    “sustainability transitions may require a shift towards the second agenda.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Structuralism argues that large-scale changes start with new ideas, ideologies and discourses.

    “While this suggestion resonates with structuralism, which argues that large-scale changes start with new ideas, ideologies and discourses, it also indicates that realization of change also requires spillovers to other domains (e.g.politics, economics).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These criticisms tainted functionalism's reputation and made it suspicious in social theory.

    “These criticisms tainted the reputation of functionalism and made it 'suspicious' in social theory.7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Sustainability is an ambiguous and contested concept.

    “Sustainability is an ambiguous and contested concept.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Sustainability transitions should be seen as deliberative social learning processes, not technocratic challenges.

    “Sustainability transitions should therefore not be seen as technocratic challenges, but as deliberative social learning processes (Stirling, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stirling, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Interpretivism perceives actors as creative and continuously engaged in sense-making.

    “interpretivism/constructivism perceives actors as creative and continuously engaged in sense-making (Weick, 1979).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weick, 1979

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Later scholars argued that suspicion of functionalism makes it difficult to ask questions about larger social constellations.

    “Later scholars (e.g.Mouzelis, 1995) argued, however, that the baby may have been thrown out with the bathwater and that the suspicion of functionalism makes it difficult to ask questions about larger social constellations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mouzelis, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Learning includes behavioural learning (learning-by-doing) and cognitive learning (action, reflection, sensemaking).

    “Learning not only includes behavioural learning (learning-by-doing which evolutionary theories operationalize through search and performance feedback), but also cognitive learning (which emphasizes action, reflection and sensemaking) (Schön, 1983;Gavetti and Levinthal, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schön, 1983

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gavetti and Levinthal, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Functionalism assumes a division of tasks and responsibilities, but all groups are impelled to contribute to the overall goal of stable functioning of the social system.

    “Although functionalism assumes a division of tasks and responsibilities, all groups are impelled to contribute to the overall goal: stable functioning of the social system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Structuralism perceives actors as part of social collectives that share particular belief systems, symbolic sets and cultural categories that provide meaning and a sense of direction.

    “Structuralism perceives actors as part of social collectives that share particular belief systems, symbolic sets and cultural categories that provide meaning and a sense of direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Braudel distinguishes three phases in the transition to welfare states: an ideological phase, a mobilization phase, and a political/governmental phase.

    “Braudel (1993), for instance, distinguishes three phases in the transition to welfare states: (1) the ideological phase (1815-1870), where social reformers drew attention to poverty-related problems and developed new ideas and vocabularies with words like industrialist, capitalist, exploitation, proletariat, the masses, and Socialism; (2) the phase of mobilization , where militant labor (trade un”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braudel (1993)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Freeman acknowledges that incremental improvement of existing systems will not be enough to achieve the needed scale of reduction in energy and materials consumption in industrial countries during the twenty-first century, and that radical innovations including new transport, construction and industrial systems will be needed.

    “But in his conclusions, Freeman (1992: 207) acknowledges that this is not sufficient: “the incremental improvement of existing systems will not be enough to achieve the scale of reduction in energy and materials consumption which will be needed in the industrial countries during the twenty-first century.Radical innovations will be needed including new transport, construction and industrial systems”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Freeman (1992)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In structural-functionalism, change is caused by external disturbances that disrupt equilibriums, create tensions, and change system needs; the system then adjusts and settles into a new equilibrium.

    “In structural-functionalism, change is caused by external disturbances that disrupt equilibriums, create tensions, and change system needs.The system then adjusts through changes in the Goalattainment and Adaptation-functions and settles down in a new equilibrium.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Actors have different interpretations of the balance between social, economic, and environmental sustainability, different rankings of environmental problems, and different views about solutions and policy packages.

    “Actors not only have different interpretations of the right balance between social, economic and environmental sustainability, but also have different rankings of environmental problems and hold different views about the (dis)advantages of particular solutions and the most appropriate policy packages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Modern societies have developed industries, markets, science, and technology for Adaptation; political institutions for Goal-attainment; religion and civil society for Integration; and schools and families for Latency.

    “Modern societies have developed industries, markets, science and technology for Adaptation; political institutions for Goal-attainment; religion and civil society for Integration; and schools and families for Latency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Weber argued that shifts in societal beliefs, ideas and ideologies may influence the direction of societal development.

    “In his famous switchmen metaphors, Weber argued that shifts in societal beliefs, ideas and ideologies may influence the direction of societal development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weber

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some claim complex systems theory can be applied to economic, ecological, and social systems, but the operationalization of actors tends to be abstract with few concrete sociological characteristics.

    “While some claim that complex systems theory can be applied to economic, ecological and social systems (Holling, 2001), the operationalization of actors tends to be abstract and with few concrete sociological characteristics (Horgan, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Holling, 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Horgan, 1995 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    These system theories address dynamic interactions between system elements, whereas functionalism distinguishes separate domains and sub-systems.

    “Whereas functionalism distinguishes separate domains and sub-systems, these system theories address dynamic interactions between system elements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Macro-historians suggest that ideological and cultural changes often create an initial impetus for societal change.

    “Also macro-historians suggest that ideological and cultural changes often create an initial impetus for societal change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For deliberate transitions, political leaders and experts develop new goals and use science and technology to adjust the economic sub-system; the new system is anchored in new behavioural norms and values through Integration and Latency.

    “For deliberate (purposive) transitions, political leaders (Holling, 2001: 394). and experts develop new goals and subsequently use science and technology to adjust the economic sub-system.The new system is then anchored in new behavioural norms and values through the internally oriented functions (Integration, Latency).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Interactive mechanisms in interpretivism are conversations, debates, negotiations, and learning processes.

    “Interactive mechanisms are conversations, debates, negotiations, and learning processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Conformity to cognitive institutions confers legitimacy, which helps firms create public acceptance, political protection and venture capital mobilization.

    “Conformity to cognitive institutions confers legitimacy, which help firms to create public acceptance, political protection and venture capital mobilization (Suchman, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Suchman, 1995 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Deep ecology and eco-centrist approaches reject Modernism and advocate deep green lifestyles, localism, and decentralized renewable energy.

    “More radical cultural shifts are advocated by 'deep ecology' and eco-centrist approaches (Katz et al., 2000), which reject 'Modernism' (based on economic growth, science, technical progress) and advocate 'deep green' life styles, localism and decentralized renewable energy options.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Katz et al., 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Interpretivism/constructivism is an agency-oriented ontology interested in meaning.

    “The interpretive/constructivist ontology is, like structuralism, interested in 'meaning', but it takes a more agency-oriented approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    When internal dynamics create rigidities or vulnerabilities, external shocks may lead to system collapse, release of accumulated resources, and a shift towards a new basin of attraction.

    “When internal dynamics create rigidities (reducing the system's adaptive potential) or vulnerabilities (moving the system towards thresholds), external shocks may lead to system collapse, the release of accumulated resources and a shift towards a new 'basin of attraction'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    Struggles, plotting, and coalition building appear as a dimension of all social domains where people have conflicting interests.

    “Struggles, plotting, and coalition building thus appeared as a dimension of all social domains where people have conflicting interests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    These scholars ask for more analytical attention to the 'socio' in socio-technical transitions and for analysis of the construction of 'normality' in user practices.

    “These scholars therefore ask for more analytical attention to the 'socio' in socio-technical transitions and for analysis of the construction of 'normality' in user practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Corporatist networks may also change because of credibility pressure from public opinion and the electorate.

    “Corporatist networks may also change because of credibility pressure from public opinion (see the discussion under structuralism) and the electorate, the other constituency policy makers depend on.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In the growth phase, entrepreneurs exploit new opportunities, gradually leading to the emergence of a new system guided by an attractor.

    “In the growth phase, entrepreneurs exploit new opportunities, gradually leading to the emergence of a new system (guided by an attractor).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Relationist theories contain no exogenous causes because everything is endogenized in terms of networks and ongoing relations.

    “Relationist theories contain no exogenous causes, because everything is endogenized in terms of networks and ongoing relations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Resilience Alliance scholars argue for adaptive management of socio-environmental systems based on diversity, learning, flexibility, and stakeholder involvement.

    “Acknowledging non-linear dynamics and uncertainties in complex systems, scholars in the Resilience Alliance (www.resalliance.org/1.php)argue for adaptive management of socio-environmental systems based on diversity, learning, flexibility, stakeholder involvement (Berkes et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berkes et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Conflict and power scholars have made crossovers to other ontologies.

    “Conflict and power scholars have thus made crossovers to other ontologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In a functionalist logic, external environmental shocks and disasters may be needed to achieve sustainability transitions.

    “In a functionalist logic (external) environmental shocks and disasters may therefore be needed to achieve sustainability transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Conflict theories are opposites of functionalism: they see processes and struggles rather than static society, contestation and conflict rather than orderliness, and order arising from coercion rather than shared norms, values, and goals.

    “Conflict theories are opposites of functionalism in various respects.Where functionalism sees society as static, conflict theories see processes and struggles; where functionalism emphasizes the orderliness of society, conflict theorists see contestation and conflict; where functionalism sees society as being held together by norms, values and shared goals, conflict scholars argue that order”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hård developed a social conflict approach that criticized SCOT for analyzing interpretive closure processes as consensual negotiation and highlighted power struggles as a closure mechanism in technological change.

    “In a similar vein, Hård (1993) developed a social conflict approach that criticized the Social Construction of Technology Approach for analyzing interpretive closure processes in terms of consensual negotiation and highlighted power struggles as closure mechanism in technological change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hård, 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Holling portrays an adaptive cycle supposed to hold for all complex adaptive systems, consisting of four phases: exploitation/growth, accumulation/conservation, collapse/release, and renewal/reorganization.

    “Holling (2001) schematically portrays an adaptive cycle, which is supposed to hold for all complex adaptive systems and consists of four phases: exploitation/growth, accumulation/conservation, collapse/release and renewal/reorganization (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holling, 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    As connections increase and resources accumulate, systems gain stability and move into the conservation phase, a semi-stable equilibrium that may persist for a long time.

    “As connections increase and resource accumulate, systems gain stability and move into the conservation phase, characterized by a semi-stable equilibrium that may persist for a long time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In the last 50-100 years, people experienced and enacted major shifts in social practices such as bathing and showering, office heating and cooling, and laundry, leading to major increases in the use of chemicals, water, and energy.

    “In the last 50-100 years, people experienced and enacted major shifts in social practices such as bathing and showering, office heating and cooling, and the laundry, leading to major increases in the use of chemicals, water, and energy (Shove, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shove, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While Neo-Marxist theories tend to focus on collective actors, other conflict theorists shifted focus to micro-power and conflicts between self-interested individuals.

    “While Neo-Marxist theories tend to focus on collective actors, other conflict theorists shifted the focus to 'micro-power' (Collins, 1975) and conflicts between self-interested individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Collins, 1975

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Practice approaches have been extended to user practices, conceptualized as fluid constellations of material objects/technologies, symbolic meanings and images, and user competence/skills.

    “Practice approaches have also been extended to user practices, which are conceptualized as fluid constellations of material objects/technologies, symbolic meanings and images, and user competence/skills (Shove and Pantzar, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shove and Pantzar, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    This short collapse phase is followed by reorganization of elements and resources through self-organization, experimentation, and new combinations.

    “This short phase is followed by reorganization of elements and resources (self-organization, experimentation, new combinations).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    While relationism criticizes other ontologies for reification and essentialism, other ontologies criticize relationism for relativism and limited explanatory potential.

    “While relationism criticizes other ontologies for reification and essentialism, other ontologies criticize relationism for relativism and limited explanatory potential.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Niche actors lobby for subsidies or favourable regulations but are usually less influential because they have less political and economic clout.

    “Niche actors, who also lobby for subsidies or favourable regulations, are usually less influential, because they have less political and economic clout.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    ANT talks of human and non-human actants and conceptualizes innovation as a complex alignment process of heterogeneous elements.

    “ANT therefore talks of human and non-human 'actants' and conceptualizes innovation as complex alignment process of heterogeneous elements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Although the purpose is to prevent transitions understood as collapse of productive eco-systems, these suggestions have similarities with transition management that aims to stimulate transitions to more sustainable systems.

    “Although the purpose is to prevent transitions (understood as collapse of productive eco-systems), it is interesting that these suggestions have similarities with transition management (Rotmans et al., 2001) that aims to stimulate transitions to more sustainable systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rotmans et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Figuration sociology argues that actors are caught up in social figurations characterized by emergent characteristics and unintended consequences.

    “One exemplar is figuration sociology (Elias, 1978), which argues that actors are caught up in social figurations characterized by emergent characteristics and unintended consequences:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Elias, 1978

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ANT conceptualizes the world as flat (or folded) and refutes the notion of institutions or structural levels.

    “ANT, for example, conceptualises the world as 'flat' (or folded) and refutes the notion of institutions or structural levels:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Callon, 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Practice theories focus on local practices and everyday lifeworlds, highlighting mechanisms such as improvisation, tinkering, bricolage, and repair work.

    “Practice theories form another exemplar, focusing on local practices and everyday lifeworlds, and highlighting mechanisms such as improvisation, tinkering, bricolage, and repair work (see also Shove and Walker in this special issue).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    They use terms such as horizontal circulation, interconnectedness of many elements, active integration of constitutive elements, and practices have emergent and uncontrollable trajectories to hint at interesting dynamics.

    “They use terms such as 'horizontal circulation', 'interconnectedness of many elements', 'active integration of constitutive elements', and 'practices have emergent and uncontrollable trajectories' to hint at interesting dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because these terms are more descriptive than explanatory, it remains unclear how they can be used to analyse the dynamics of convention beyond the empirical mapping of individual cases.

    “But because these terms are more descriptive than explanatory, it remains unclear how they can be used to 'analyse the dynamics of convention' in a way that goes beyond the empirical mapping of individual cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The problem for sustainability transitions is that many unsustainable industries have many economic resources and good political contacts, which may hinder, delay, or water down strict environmental regulations.

    “The problem for sustainability transitions is that many unsustainable industries have many economic resources and good political contacts, which may hinder, delay or water down strict environmental regulations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Theories may therefore be defamiliarizing and rich in paradox.

    “Theories may therefore be defamiliarizing and rich in paradox.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Conflict and power ontology's causal agents are collective actors with conflicting goals and interests; the core mechanism is conflict and power struggle, with dominant groups using power to protect their interests against subordinate groups seeking change.

    “Causal agents in the conflict and power ontology are collective actors (classes, industry associations, social movements, special-interest groups) with conflicting goals and interests.The core mechanism is conflict and power struggle, with dominant groups using power (force, domination, control, exclusion) to protect their interests against subordinate groups that seek change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    This work focuses more on adaptation than mitigation, asking how socio-environmental systems should adapt to stresses from natural resource exploitation or environmental change.

    “This work focuses more on adaptation than mitigation, asking how socioenvironmental systems should adapt to stresses that come from natural resource exploitation or environmental change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While individual moves and specific events can be explained with causal mechanisms, the interweaving of individual moves leads to event sequences and aggregated processes that are not foreseen or controlled.

    “While moves by individual actors and specific events can be explained with causal mechanisms (e.g.calculation, power struggles, interpretation), the interweaving of individual moves leads to event sequences and aggregated processes that are not foreseen or controlled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    While it is doable to empirically follow the actors in these projects, this method creates practical problems for large-scale transitions with many thousands of actors.

    “While it is doable to empirically 'follow the actors' in these projects, this method creates practical problems for large-scale transitions with many thousands of actors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The previous sections demonstrated the breadth of generic social science traditions and how their insights can be related to socio-technical transitions and sustainability.

    “The previous sections demonstrated the breath of generic social science traditions and how their insights can be related to sociotechnical transitions and sustainability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This abstract representation shows family resemblances to Schumpeterian waves of creative destruction but has deterministic and teleological overtones because specific social mechanisms remain underspecified.

    “This abstract representation shows family resemblances to Schumpeterian waves of creative destruction.8 But since specific social mechanisms remain underspecified, it also has deterministic and teleological overtones (related to attractors and predetermined phases).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The environmental sense of urgency will be lower than for functional problems such as congestion or energy security that directly affect transport and energy systems.

    “The environmental sense of urgency will then be lower than for functional problems such as congestion or energy security that directly affect transport and energy systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Various conflict and power theories highlight different sources of power and different social groups.

    “There are various conflict and power theories, which highlight different sources of power and different social groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Shove and Walker's commentary suggests that changes in social practices come about through integration or erosion of various elements or ingredients.

    “Their commentary suggests that changes in social practices come about through integration (or erosion) of various 'elements' or 'ingredients'.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Røpke argues that the environmental debate is skewed towards supply-side issues, ignoring major unsustainable demand-side changes that led to larger housing areas, more household equipment, higher meat consumption, greater mobility, and more long-distance travel.

    “Also Røpke (2001) argues that the environmental debate is skewed towards supplyside issues, ignoring major (unsustainable) demand-side changes that led to larger housing areas, more household equipment, higher meat consumption, greater mobility, more long-distance travel, etc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Røpke, 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dynamic networks are primary; actors are secondary.

    “Dynamic networks are primary, actors secondary.10”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Marx emphasized power related to material resources, arguing that capitalists who own property and means of production control workers who must sell their labour.

    “Marx, for instance, emphasised the power related to material resources, arguing that capitalists who own property and 'means of production' have control over workers who must sell their labour to earn a living.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    New vocabularies and concepts can be criticized for empiricism: good at description, weak at explanation.

    “The new vocabulairies and concepts can, however, be criticized for empiricism: good at description, weak at explanation (Collins and Yearley, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Collins and Yearley, 1992

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Causal mechanisms in relationism emphasize processes such as alignment, enrolment, attachments, translation, co-construction, and mutual constitution.

    “Causal mechanisms emphasise processes such as alignment, enrolment, attachments, translation, co-construction and mutual constitution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sustainability transitions in the conflict/power ontology may require either increasing pressure from public opinion on policy makers or further growth of green niches into important economic sectors that can successfully lobby for regulatory changes.

    “Sustainability transitions in this ontology may thus require either increasing pressure from public opinion on policy makers or further growth of 'green' niches into important economic sectors that can successfully lobby for further regulatory changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Relationism assumes that the identity, preferences, and interests of individual actors are fluid and constituted by relations and ongoing interactions, which are therefore the causal agent.

    “Relationism instead assumes that the identity, preferences and interests of individual actors are fluid and constituted by relations and ongoing interactions, which are therefore the causal agent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ANT develops a relationist view that includes materiality; humans shape artefacts, and artefacts shape humans.

    “An exemplar in the STI-field is actor-network theory (e.g.Latour, 1987).While Elias looks at social figurations, ANT develops a relationist view that includes materiality (artefacts, technology).In this view, humans not only shape artefacts, but artefacts also shape humans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Latour, 1987

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    For sustainability transitions, structural-functionalism argues that societies, especially policy makers, should set overarching environmental goals.

    “For sustainability transitions, structural-functionalism argues that societies, especially policy makers, should set overarching environmental goals (e.g. the Kyoto Protocol, Millennium Development Goals).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Relationism is a non-essentialist process ontology that criticizes other ontologies for assuming foundational attributes and searching for ultimate causes.

    “Relationism is a non-essentialist process ontology, which criticizes other ontologies for assuming that people have foundational attributes and for (fruitlessly) searching for ultimate causes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Critical theorists from the Frankfurt school emphasized cultural dimensions of power and oppression, especially the rise of culture industries and instrumental rationality.

    “Critical theorists from the Frankfurt school (e.g.Horkheimer and Adorno, 1947) also emphasized the cultural dimensions of power and oppression, in particular the rise of culture industries and instrumental rationality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horkheimer and Adorno, 1947

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hegelian Marxists such as Gramsci argued that stability of the status quo comes not only from economic domination and state coercion but also from hegemony, ideology, and belief systems that make existing structures look natural and prevent new class consciousness.

    “In response to Marx's presumed economic determinism (with technical and economic 'substructures' driving change in institutional and cultural 'superstructures'), Hegelian Marxists such as Gramsci (1932) argued that stability of the status quo not only comes from economic domination and state coercion, but also from 'hegemony', ideology and belief systems that make existing structures look 'natural”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gramsci, 1932

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The emerging new configuration provides new opportunities for entrepreneurs.

    “The emerging new configuration then provides new opportunities for entrepreneurs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The MLP's embeddedness view does not deny the possibility of rational choice; rational choice can be a special case in stable rule structures that enable calculation.

    “But the MLP's embeddedness view does not necessarily deny the possibility of 'rational choice'.Instead, rational choice can be a special case in the context of stable rule structures that enable calculation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Eclecticism can produce workable frameworks for particular purposes, but ad-hoc combinations risk producing inconsistent frameworks and remaining fuzzy about dynamic relationships between very different dimensions.

    “The third position, eclecticism, can produce workable frameworks for particular purposes (like good engineers can sometimes combine technical elements without caring too much about the underlying scientific foundations).The risk, however, is that ad-hoc combinations produce inconsistent frameworks and remain fuzzy about dynamic relationships between very different dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Strategic reorientation of incumbent firms is unlikely until existing regimes begin to destabilize.

    “But such strategic reorientation is unlikely until existing regimes begin to destabilize.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Levinthal (1992) suggests that development of new knowledge and competences usually precedes changes in strategy and mission, providing internal resources for reorientation.

    “Levinthal (1992) suggests that the development of new knowledge and competences usually precedes such changes in strategy and mission, because this provides the internal resources for reorientation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Levinthal (1992) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the multi-dimensionality of niche-regime-landscape interactions is a strength of the MLP, it is conceptualized in a general and heuristic sense, so the MLP could benefit from conceptual extensions of multi-level interaction on various dimensions.

    “Although the multi-dimensionality of niche-regime-landscape interactions is a strength of the MLP, this is conceptualized in a general and heuristic sense.The MLP could therefore benefit from conceptual extensions of multi-level interaction on various dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Theory as narrative explains social processes as sequences of events enacted by social groups, with emphasis on intentions, motivations, hermeneutics, Verstehen, analytical generalization, and dynamic patterns.

    “(b) 'theory as narrative', which explains social processes as sequences of events that are enacted by social groups; the methodological emphasis is on intentions and motivations (hermeneutics, Verstehen), analytical generalization, and dynamic patterns”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although rational choice has limited relevance for understanding transitions, the MLP could accommodate it at the regime level during stable periods and for diffusion phases, but since evolutionary economics can explain both aspects, the MLP does not really need rational choice, and rational choice offers few insights into niche-regime interactions.

    “Although rational choice has limited relevance for understanding transitions (eras of ferment), the MLP could accommodate rational choice at the regime level during stable periods.Rational choice may also offer insights for the diffusion phases of new technologies: once dominant designs and new institutions have stabilized, policy makers and firms are better able to make costbenefit calculations”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The fourth position, inter-ontology crossovers, focuses on interactions between ontologies, recognizes differences but works on dynamic interplay rather than overarching synthesis, and is particularly fruitful for multi-dimensional phenomena such as socio-technical transitions.

    “The fourth position, inter-ontology crossovers, focuses on interactions between ontologies (Gioia and Pitre, 1990;Lewis and Grimes, 1999).Crossover approaches recognize differences between ontologies, but work on dynamic interplay rather than overarching synthesis.Ontologies are not perceived as pieces in a jigsaw puzzle, but also not accepted as fully incommensurable.Instead, this position is”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gioia and Pitre, 1990 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lewis and Grimes, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The MLP does not make crossovers to functionalism.

    “I therefore argue that the MLP does not make crossovers to functionalism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The MLP is not a functionalist framework because it does not assume all actors work towards shared system goals, has no teleology, and no bias towards stability; coordinating regime rules are semi-coherent, allowing tensions and conflicts.

    “But the MLP is not a functionalist framework because it does not assume that all actors work towards shared system goals, has no teleology, and no bias towards stability.Coordinating regime rules are described as semi-coherent, which allows for possible tensions and conflicts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Rational choice may hold for periods of incremental change when socio-institutional structures form stable backgrounds, but faces problems for periods of ferment when flux, uncertainty and fluidity complicate cost-benefit calculations.

    “Using the punctuated equilibrium framework, we can say that rational choice may hold for periods of incremental change when socio-institutional structures form stable backgrounds that allow rational calculation (Fig. 3).But it faces problems for periods of ferment, when background structures are opened up and social, political and organizational processes gain prominence.The accompanying flux,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Full integration into an encompassing theory is difficult because some ontologies focus on individual actors while others focus on larger wholes and collectives, and some focus on objective reality and material interests while others see reality as inter-subjectively created.

    “The first position, full integration into an encompassing theory, is difficult, because some ontologies focus on individual actors, others on larger wholes and collectives; some focus on 'objective' reality and material interests, while others see reality as inter-subjectively created.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The MLP already makes ad-hoc crossovers to structuralism, incorporating macro-cultural changes at the landscape level.

    “The MLP already makes ad-hoc crossovers to structuralism, incorporating macro-cultural changes at the landscape level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The incommensurability position assumes that interaction between ontologies is impossible, privileges normal science, hinders theoretical innovation through new combinations, and tends towards reductionism and constant-cause explanations, which are problematic for heterogeneous topics such as socio-technical transitions.

    “The second position, incommensurability, assumes that interaction between ontologies is impossible.It thus privileges 'normal science' that stays within existing paradigms and hinders theoretical innovations through 'new combinations' between ontologies.It also tends towards reductionism (emphasising single causes) and constant-cause explanations (assuming that one causal mechanism operates contin”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In the MLP, the landscape level refers to deep structural dimension of culture, while actors at regime and niche levels engage in cultural actions, developing discourses that draw on deep cultural categories and frame issues to confer legitimacy.

    “While the MLP's landscape level refers to the deep structural dimension of culture, actors at regime and niche levels engage in cultural actions, developing discourses that draw on deep cultural categories and frame issues in such a way as to confer legitimacy to their actions and/or technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social movements start as outsiders, tend to use non-institutionalized action to exert pressure; early SMT scholars highlighted resource mobilization; other scholars demonstrated influence related to political opportunity structures; cultural framing defines cognitive space; social movements can contest dominant ideology and create legitimacy pressures; technology-oriented scholars drew attention

    “Because social movements start as outsiders to existing orders, they tend to use non-institutionalized action (protest marches, blockades, strikes, petitions) to exert pressure for change.Early SMT scholars highlighted the mobilization of resources (members, money, expertise) as the main mechanism for increasing the pressure (McCarthy and Zald, 1977).To complement this 'internal push' mechanism,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites McCarthy and Zald, 1977 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kitschelt, 1986 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Eyerman and Jamison, 1991

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Attempts at integration (e.g., Bourdieu, Alexander) have been criticised for abstract theorising about philosophical principles rather than sociological mechanisms, for coining new words that restate foundational tensions without solving them, and for a general dissociation from empirical research.

    “Attempts at integration (e.g.Bourdieu, Alexander) have been criticised for abstract theorising about philosophical principles rather than sociological mechanisms, for coining new words that restate foundational tensions without solving them, and for a general dissociation from empirical research (Burger, 1986;Van den Berg, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Burger, 1986 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Van den Berg, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Complex systems theory constitutes an alternative way of investigating transitions, with similarities and differences to the MLP.

    “I therefore suggest that complex systems theory constitutes an alternative way of investigating transitions, with intriguing similarities but also differences to the MLP (see Sections 2.5.2 and 2.5.3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the MLP, actors are knowledgeable agents who interpret and apply rules creatively within constraints, and retention is an interpretive, negotiated and contested process of institutionalization.

    “Actors are not cultural dopes who passively follow rules.Instead, they are knowledgeable agents (Giddens, 1984), who interpret and apply rules creatively (although within constraints).Retention is not only a process of 'retaining what works' (as in behavioural theory), but also an interpretive, negotiated and contested process of institutionalization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Giddens, 1984

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The MLP accommodates both behavioural learning and cognitive learning, and between levels there is an evolutionary logic with niche-innovations providing variety that interacts with selection environments, while creation of fit is also an enacted and multidimensional process.

    “This accommodates both behavioural learning ('trial-and-error' dynamics from evolution theory) and cognitive learning (sense-making from interpretivism).Between the levels there is an evolutionary logic, with heterogeneous niche-innovations providing (radical) variety that interacts with broader selection environments (at regime and landscape levels).But the creation of fit between variations and”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Discourse analysts added interactive dimensions by addressing collective sensemaking; interpretations sediment into discourses, which contain deep structural elements framed by actors; discursive framing is contested, and discursive struggles influence cultural legitimacy, public support, political protection or financial resources.

    “Discourse analysts added interactive dimensions by addressing collective sensemaking around specific issues.Because collective sense-making is an ongoing process, the interpretations sediment into particular discourses, i.e. ways of talking and thinking about issues (Hajer, 1995).Discourses contain deep structural elements that are framed by actors in particular ways.This discursive framing is a”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hajer, 1995

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Suchman, 1995 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lounsbury and Glynn, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Regime actors develop discourses that maintain or restore legitimacy when faced with problems or criticisms; social movements and niche actors try to delegitimate the regime by framing industry practices as insufficient, outdated, irresponsible, or unacceptable; niche actors engage in cultural framing to enhance legitimacy of niche-innovations, which initially suffer from liability of newness and低

    “Regime actors develop discourses that maintain or restore legitimacy when they are faced with problems or criticisms (television debates, advertisements).Social movements and niche actors try to delegimate the regime by framing industry practices or responses to problems as 'insufficient', 'outdated', 'irresponsible', or 'unacceptable' (Oliver, 1992).Niche actors also engage in cultural framing”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Oliver, 1992 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Freeman et al., 1983 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Theory as enlightenment aims to clear away conventional notions, uncover hidden structures, or introduce unconventional, creative, and surprising frameworks.

    “(c) 'theory as enlightenment', which aims to clear away conventional notions, uncover hidden structures, or introduce unconventional, creative and surprising frameworks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    Incumbent firms in the car, electricity, and food industries possess many complementary assets relevant for the upscaling and commercialization of green niche-innovations.

    “The reason is that incumbent firms in the car, electricity, and food industries posses many complementary assets (see Section 2.1) that are relevant for the upscaling and commercialization of green niche-innovations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Work on dynamic capabilities and ambidextrous organizations shows that incumbent firms can overcome lock-in mechanisms and that deliberate changes in firm strategy are crucial for reorientation.

    “This work not only shows that incumbent firms can overcome the lock-in mechanisms that tie them to existing technological regimes, but also suggest that deliberate changes in firm strategy are crucial for reorientation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Teece et al., 1997 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tushman and O'Reilly, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The crossover between evolution theory and interpretivism is facilitated by similarities in ontological assumptions: both assume creative and heterogeneous actors, acknowledge embeddedness in regimes, focus on process over time, and can explain incremental and radical change.

    “This crossover is facilitated by similarities in ontological assumptions.Most importantly, both ontologies assume creative and heterogeneous actors, but also acknowledge the embedded-ness of actors in regimes.Furthermore, both have an intrinsic focus on process and development over time, and can explain both incremental and radical change (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The previously discussed ontologies refer to foundational positions and assumptions about the properties of causal agents and causal mechanisms in the social world.

    “The previously discussed ontologies refer to foundational positions and assumptions about the properties of causal agents and causal mechanisms in the social world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the MLP, variation is guided by expectations, visions and beliefs; selection occurs in a multi-dimensional selection environment; retention occurs in technological regimes conceptualized as rules rather than routines.

    “Variation is seen as guided by expectations (Van Lente, 1993), visions and beliefs that provide cognitive substance to search and innovation processes by intentional actors.Selection occurs in a multi-dimensional selection environment, which incorporates not only markets and regulations, but also social, cultural, and political requirements.Retention occurs in technological regimes, which are”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Van Lente, 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rip and Kemp, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Crossovers to structuralism may enrich the MLP with cultural mechanisms that enable scholars to analyze how discursive struggles between niche and regime actors, in the context of changing landscape repertoires, influence the speed and direction of socio-technical transitions.

    “These kinds of crossovers to structuralism may enrich the MLP with cultural mechanisms that enable scholars to analyze how discursive struggles between niche and regime actors, in the context of changing (landscape) repertoires, influence the speed and direction of socio-technical transitions (Geels and Verhees, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Geels and Verhees, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Discursive action and legitimacy form mechanisms that link cultural dimensions to politics and economics, and these crossover mechanisms provide interesting extensions of the MLP.

    “Discursive action and legitimacy thus form mechanisms that link cultural dimensions to politics and economics.These crossover mechanisms also provide interesting extensions of the MLP (Geels and Verhees, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Geels and Verhees, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The interpretive turn in cultural studies argues that meaning arises from interpretation, mobilization and ordering of cultural symbols and cognitive categories; cultural deep structures become toolkits or repertoires actors use to make sense.

    “The 'interpretive turn' in cultural studies argues that meaning arises from interpretation, a process in which actors actively draw upon cultural deep structures.Meaning arises from the mobilization and ordering of cultural symbols and cognitive categories.Cultural deep structures thus become 'toolkits' or 'repertoires' that actors use to make sense (Swidler, 1986).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Swidler, 1986 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The MLP's crossovers to conflict ontology are mostly ad-hoc; because the MLP does not provide detailed explanations of sources and changes of power, it could benefit from richer, multi-faceted views of power and conflict.

    “But this is mostly done in an adhoc way.Because the MLP does not provide detailed explanations of the sources and changes of power, it could benefit from richer, multi-faceted views of power and conflict (Smith et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lukes (1974) distinguished three faces of power: formal decision-making, agenda-setting, and influencing preferences of subordinate groups.

    “Lukes (1974), for instance, distinguished 'three faces of power', the first being the use of political power and authority in formal decisionmaking arenas.The second relates to the power to place issues on or keep them off the agenda (backroom deals, lobbying, implicit threats).The third is about influencing the preferences of subordinate groups so that they do not feel the urge to place issues on”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lukes (1974)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The MLP may benefit from crossovers to social movement theory, which deals with conflicts between established orders and groups aiming to correct perceived injustice; these crossovers may be especially fruitful for transitions towards normative goals such as sustainability.

    “The MLP may also benefit from crossovers to social movement theory (SMT), which explicitly deals with conflicts between established orders and groups that aim to correct some perceived injustice.These crossovers may be especially fruitful for transitions towards normative goals (such as 'sustainability').”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Interpretive strategy scholars argue that strategic reorientation tends to be preceded by changes in belief systems and interpretive schemes, which alter perceptions of future viability of existing regimes and chances of niche-innovations.

    “Interpretive strategy scholars further argue that strategic reorientation also tends to be preceded by changes in belief systems and interpretive schemes, which alter the perceptions of the future viability of existing regimes and the chances of niche-innovations (Grinyer and McKiernan, 1990;Barr et al., 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Grinyer and McKiernan, 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Barr et al., 1992 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Top-down structuralism has been criticised for reification, a monolithic view of cultural deep structures, and determinism; cultural sociology and discourse analysis developed more dynamic and agency-oriented approaches that conceptualize linkages between symbolic deep structures and framing struggles.

    “But this kind of 'top-down' structuralism has been criticised for reification, a monolithic view of cultural deep structures, and determinism.Cultural sociology and discourse analysis therefore developed more dynamic and agency-oriented approaches that conceptualize linkages between symbolic deep structures on the one hand and framing struggles and 'collective meaning making' on the other hand (Sp”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Spillman, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Theory as covering laws explains by drawing on general laws, with methodological emphasis on measurement, variables, and statistical generalization.

    “(a) 'theory as covering laws', where explanations derive from drawing on general laws; the methodological emphasis is on measurement, variables, and statistical generalization;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The MLP has been criticized for being functionalist, but this criticism is more via labelling than substantiated argument.

    “The MLP has been criticized for being functionalist (Smith et al., 2005;Genus and Coles, 2008), although more via labelling than substantiated argument (see also footnote 7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Genus and Coles, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Specific theories and conceptual frameworks may stay within one ontology or work from multi-dimensional and more complex assumptions.

    “Specific theories and conceptual frameworks may stay within one ontology, as the previously discussed exemplars, or work from multi-dimensional and more complex assumptions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These approaches suggest possibilities for theoretical extensions of the MLP that address cultural interactions between niche, regime and landscape levels.

    “These approaches suggest possibilities for theoretical extensions of the MLP that address cultural interactions between niche, regime and landscape levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Crossovers addressing co-evolution of firm strategy, perceptions and technological knowledge can enrich the MLP with business-related mechanisms of niche-regime interactions.

    “These kinds of crossovers, which address the co-evolution of firm strategy, perceptions and technological knowledge, can enrich the MLP with business-related mechanisms of niche-regime interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Rational choice, functionalism, and relationism are rich ontologies capable of generating alternative frameworks for sustainability transitions.

    “Rational choice, functionalism, and relationism are rich ontologies that can generate alternative frameworks on (sustainability) transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mintzberg et al. (1998) distinguish ten different schools in strategic management.

    “Mintzberg et al. (1998), for instance, distinguish ten different schools in strategic management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mintzberg et al. (1998)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shove and Walker advocate a flatter model of multiple relations rather than hierarchical levels, yet they also employ notions of enduring, relatively stable practices and trajectories that refer to stable and predictable structures.

    “Although Shove and Walker (this special issue) argue for a 'flatter model characterised by multiple relations (rather than hierarchical levels)', they also use notions such as 'enduring and relatively stable practices' and 'trajectories' (which refer to relatively stable and predictable structures).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shove and Walker (this special issue)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sustainability transitions will be full of debates about relative importance of environmental problems, entailing deep-seated values and beliefs; private actors have no immediate incentive to address sustainability problems; public authorities and civil society will be crucial drivers.

    “The former means that sustainability transitions will be full of debates about the relative importance of various environmental problems, which entail deep-seated values and beliefs.The latter means that private actors have no immediate incentive to address sustainability problems.Public authorities and civil society will therefore be crucial drivers for sustainability transitions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The MLP frames the topic of transitions in a particular manner and poses specific questions about patterns and mechanisms.

    “MLP frames the topic of transitions in a certain way and asks particular questions about patterns and mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Foucault developed accounts of power in which discourse or episteme influences what is considered acceptable.

    “Foucault also developed views on power in which discourse (or episteme) exerts influence by defining what is acceptable(Foucault, 1970).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foucault, 1970

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The MLP has been inspired by relationism via Rip and Kemp (1998) who draw on ANT notions such as heterogeneous configuration, co-construction of social and technical elements, and emphasis on ongoing processes, linkages and alignments; some of Geels and Schot's (2007) transition pathways build on these dynamic notions.

    “The MLP has been inspired by relationism, e.g.via Rip and Kemp (1998) who draw on actor-network theory (ANT) notions such as heterogeneous configuration, a socio-technical focus where social and technical elements co-construct each other, and an emphasis on ongoing processes, linkages and alignments.Also some of Geels and Schot's (2007) transition pathways (reconfiguration and dealignment/realigm”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rip and Kemp (1998)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Geels and Schot's (2007)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Various theories cannot be added up and combined as pieces in a puzzle; one needs to be reflexive about differences in theoretical traditions and underlying assumptions.

    “One caveat to this call for opening up innovation studies is that various theories cannot be added up and combined as pieces in a puzzle.One needs to be reflexive about differences in theoretical traditions and underlying assumptions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Current transport, energy, agri-food and other domains are characterized by multiple green niche-innovations, which deviates from many historical transitions that had one, two or sometimes three niche alternatives; this raises difficult questions of directionality and choice between multiple transition pathways.

    “Second, current transport, energy, agri-food and other domains are characterized by multiple 'green' niche-innovations.This variety deviates from many historical transitions that were characterized by one, two or sometimes three niche alternatives.It also raises difficult questions of directionality and choice between multiple transition pathways, especially since these will influence our future”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ANT has notions of networks with varying degrees of stability; Callon et al. (1992) suggests techno-economic networks are more stable if longer, more complete/chained and convergent; this creates opportunities for investigating interactions between stable networks and emerging networks.

    “Nevertheless, ANT does have notions of networks with varying degrees of stability.Callon et al. (1992), for instance, suggests that techno-economic networks are more stable if they are longer, more complete/chained and convergent.This view creates opportunities for investigating interactions between stable networks (e.g.existing socio-technical systems) and emerging networks (e.g.niche-innovations”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Callon et al. (1992)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Interpretivist theories have always been part of the MLP, despite the suggestion by Genus and Coles (2008) that SCOT should be incorporated.

    “WhereasGenus and Coles's (2008) suggest that SCOT (Social Construction of Technology) should be incorporated in the MLP, interpretivist theories have thus always been part of the MLP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Genus and Coles's (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    A fear of reification results in insufficient attention to broader cognitive, political, and economic structures that could aid in explaining broader patterns.

    “This is related to the analytical fear for reification (something that Willem Halfman once called 'reificifobia'), which leads to limited attention for broader structures (cognitive, political, economic) that could be useful for explaining broader patterns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    ANT could be positioned at the MLP's niche-level because its emphasis on innovations in-the-making and focus on what actors do has some fit with fluidity, uncertainty and experimental projects within technological niches, but ANT-scholars might perceive this as pushing their views into an analytical straightjacket, and their view on coordination might sit uncomfortably with the MLP's view on

    “One might argue that ANT could be positioned at the MLP's niche-level.ANT's emphasis on innovations 'in-the-making' and the focus on what actors do in practices to make heterogeneous configurations work has some fit with the fluidity, uncertainty and experimental projects within technological niches.But ANT-scholars might perceive such an argument as pushing their views into an analytical straight”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The MLP addresses a specific topic and rests on particular crossovers between evolution theory and interpretivism.

    “The MLP is not a grand theory or unifying framework that synthesizes all available theories, but a middle range theory (Geels, 2007) that addresses a specific topic, is based on particular crossovers between evolution theory and interpretivism”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Geels, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    SMT provides a multi-dimensional view on power struggles where social movements contest existing regimes and support niches.

    “SMT thus provides a multi-dimensional view on power struggles where social movements contest existing regimes and support niches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    For broader, multi-dimensional and complex topics, frameworks or perspectives may be more appropriate than rigorous models.

    “In the latter case, frameworks or perspectives may be more relevant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Porter, 1991 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the MLP is flexible, it cannot and does not intend to incorporate every social theory.

    “But while the MLP is a flexible framework, it cannot (and does not want to) incorporate all social theories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Assessments of costs, benefits, and negative side-effects of various green pathways entail incompatible criteria and values that differ for various groups.

    “Such assessments not only entail incompatible criteria (e.g. the landscape influence of many wind turbines versus risks of nuclear energy), but also values which differ for various groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many new environmental problems are global, not directly visible or tangible, and mainly about the future; they differ from other environmental problems that were local, immediate, visible and tangible; mobilization is more difficult because cause-effect chains are uncertain, causation diffuse, and sufferers distant in time or space.

    “Third, many of the new environmental problems (e.g.climate change, biodiversity, resource depletion) are global, not directly visible or tangible, and are mainly about the future.They therefore differ from other environmental problems (such as water pollution, smog, and acid rain), which were local, (relatively) immediate, visible and tangible.There were clear problem sufferers who could mobilize”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The elements in question remain under-defined and are presented through examples rather than conceptual arguments.

    “These elements remain under-defined, however, and are introduced via examples rather than via conceptual arguments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While crossovers to the MLP may be possible, relationism forms an intriguing ontology by itself that can perhaps develop alternative ways of investigating transitions.

    “While crossovers to the MLP may be possible, relationism forms an intriguing ontology by itself that can perhaps develop alternative ways of investigating transitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mahoney (2004) identified functionalism, rational choice, power, neo-Darwinian, and cultural ontologies as distinct.

    “Mahoney (2004) distinguished functionalism, rational choice, power, neo-Darwinian and cultural ontologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mahoney (2004) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mobilization for new environmental problems will depend to a large extent on social movements and public opinion; this is an additional reason why discourse, socio-political framing and debate are important in sustainability transitions.

    “The mobilization for these kinds of problems will therefore depend to a large extent on social movements (often supported by concerned scientists) and public opinion.This is an additional reason why discourse, socio-political framing and debate are important in sustainability transitions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Other combinations and crossovers among social theories can likely produce relevant perspectives.

    “Also other permutations and crossovers between social theories can probably generate relevant perspectives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To address analytical challenges around normativity, directionality, and social mobilization, innovation studies may need to broaden its analytical scope to include additional dynamics related to civil society, social movements and consumer behavior; further crossovers to cultural studies, political economy, economic sociology and consumer studies may be fruitful.

    “But to address the analytical challenges around normativity, directionality, and social mobilization, innovation studies may need to broaden its analytical scope to include additional dynamics related to civil society, social movements and consumer behavior.Further crossovers to cultural studies, political economy, economic sociology and consumer studies may therefore be fruitful for a”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Social network theories begin with individual actors who then build networks to advance their interests, unlike relationism.

    “This differ from social network theories that start with individual actors who subsequently build networks to further their interests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Rammert's techno-structuration approach is promising because it examines crossovers among constructivism, evolution theory, and structuration theory.

    “Rammert's (1997) techno-structuration approach is promising in this respect, because it explores crossovers between constructivism, evolution theory and structuration theory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rammert's (1997) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This criticism applies less to other relationist approaches such as practice theories, in particular Shove's work on consumer practices.

    “This criticism applies less to other relationist approaches such as practice theories, in particular Shove's work on consumer practices that analyses how existing routines, meanings and technologies influence activities in 'everyday life'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
221 of 221
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena.

    “Because socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena, they can be studied from various angles by different disciplines.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four meta-theoretical positions (complete integration, incommensurability, eclecticism, inter-ontology crossovers) exhaust the possible relations between ontologies.

    “Regarding this issue, I distinguish four meta-theoretical positions: (1) Complete integration: theories combine all (or many) ontologies into an encompassing synthesis, (2) Incommensurability: theories should work within one ontology; combination is not possible, because foundational assumptions differ too much (cannot be 'measured' in the same units), (3) Eclecticism: theories pragmatically”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ontologies discussed are representative of the generic social science traditions relevant to socio-technical transitions.

    “The previous sections demonstrated the breath of generic social science traditions and how their insights can be related to sociotechnical transitions and sustainability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The multi-level perspective is a valuable and coherent framework for analyzing socio-technical transitions, such that it is worth clarifying its theoretical roots and extending it.

    “Although the multi-dimensionality of niche-regime-landscape interactions is a strength of the MLP, this is conceptualized in a general and heuristic sense.The MLP could therefore benefit from conceptual extensions of multi-level interaction on various dimensions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sustainability transitions are a desirable and important goal, so that understanding and accelerating them is a worthwhile research aim.

    “Such a broad map is particularly relevant for future sustainability transitions, which have three additional complexities compared to many historical transitions.First, sustainability is a normative goal and a collective good problem (with associated prisoner dilemmas and free rider problems).”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is hard to accommodate the complicated and interdependent relationships between different structural elements of 'whole systems', or to track the pathways through which different macro-level actors and processes shape implementation contexts at meso- and micro-level.

    “Even so, it is hard to accommodate the complicated and interdependent relationships between different structural elements of ‘whole systems’, or to track the pathways through which different macro-level actors and processes shape implementation contexts at meso- and micro-level [39–41].”

    From Implementation, context and complexity (2016) · cites this paper as [41]

  • At the heart of these transitions is the establishment and socio-technical (re)design of higher education frameworks resulting in new forms of knowledge production, allowing for the design and redesign of human-centered socio-technical systems for sustainability, and consequently for human benefit.

    “At the heart of these transitions is the establishment and socio-technical (re)design of higher education frameworks resulting in new forms of knowledge production, allowing for the design and redesign of human-centered socio-technical systems for sustainability, and consequently for human benefit (Geels, 2010;Verbong & Geels, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gramsci, A., 1932 (1975). In: Lynne Lawner (Ed.). Letters from Prison, Antonio Gramsci, Harper Colophon, New York.
  2. Grinyer, 1990, Generating major change in stagnating companies, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 131

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geels, F. W.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Geels, Frank W.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
495-510
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134317867
Cited by
1,718
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 197 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 158 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 49
FWCI
41.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
Keywords
multi-level perspective, socio-technical transitions, reflexivity, transition theory, rational choice theory, evolutionary theory, structuralism, interpretivism, functionalism, relationalism, agency, causal mechanisms, environmental sustainability, middle-range theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review