Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 127 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Socio-technical transitions to sustainability do not come about easily because existing energy, transport, housing and agri-food systems are stabilized by lock-in mechanisms related to sunk investments, behavioural patterns, vested interests, infrastructure, favourable subsidies and regulations.
“Socio-technical transitions to sustainability do not come about easily, because existing energy, transport, housing and agri-food systems are stabilized by lock-in mechanisms that relate to sunk investments, behavioural patterns, vested interests, infrastructure, favourable subsidies and regulations (Unruh, 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Unruh, 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Responses to new environmental problems require more substantive transitions in energy, transport, and agri-food systems in the coming decades.
“responses to the new environmental problems require more substantive 'transitions' in the coming decades, i.e. major changes in energy, transport, and agri-food systems (Elzen et al., 2004;Wiskerke and Van der Ploeg, 2004;Van den Bergh and Bruinsma, 2008; see also the papers in this special issue).1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Elzen et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wiskerke and Van der Ploeg, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van den Bergh and Bruinsma, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Radical innovations emerge in niches, where dedicated actors nurture alignment and development on multiple dimensions to create configurations that work.
“Radical innovations emerge in niches, where dedicated actors nurture alignment and development on multiple dimensions to create 'configurations that work' (Rip and Kemp, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rip and Kemp, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The multi-level perspective is a middle-range theory that makes crossovers to some social science ontologies and not to others, rather than a grand or unifying theory.
“The MLP is characterized not as a grand or unifying theory, but as a middle range theory that makes crossovers to some ontologies and not to others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ontologies postulate a certain causal agent and primary causal mechanism.
“Ontologies postulate a certain causal agent and primary causal mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Interpretationnone given
The multi-level perspective makes no crossovers to rational choice and functionalism.
“It further argues that the MLP makes no crossovers to rational choice and functionalism, and can be fruitfully extended with insights from structuralism and power theories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Studies of transitions inevitably highlight certain aspects and background others.
“Studies of transitions thus inevitably highlight certain aspects and background others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Incumbents can sometimes reorient themselves and develop radical novelties that cannibalize their investments in existing technologies.
“Incumbents can sometimes reorient themselves and develop radical novelties that cannibalize their investments in existing technologies (Chandy and Tellis, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chandy and Tellis, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Incumbent firms tend to overlook or ignore radical innovations because existing competences and routines blind them to alternatives outside their focus.
“Incumbent firms tend to overlook or ignore radical innovations, because existing competences and routines blind them to alternatives outside their focus (Nelson and Winter, 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson and Winter, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
For socio-technical change, evolutionary economics focusing on firms, innovation, and market competition is especially relevant.
“For socio-technical change, evolutionary economics (EE), which focuses on firms, innovation, and market competition, is especially relevant (Nelson and Winter, 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson and Winter, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Because technological regimes or paradigms lead firms to explore the technical search space close to existing routines and competencies, innovations tend to be incremental and add up to predictable technical trajectories.
“Because technological regimes or paradigms lead firms to explore the technical search space in directions that are close to existing routines and competencies, innovations tend to be incremental adding up to predictable technical trajectories (Dosi, 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dosi, 1982 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The improved Freeman and Louçã approach is similar to the multi-level perspective in its emphasis on alignments between heterogeneous processes.
“This improved approach is similar to the MLP in its emphasis on alignments between heterogeneous processes: “It is essential to study both the relatively independent development of each stream of history and their interdependencies, their loss of integration, and their reintegration” (Freeman and Louc ¸ȃ, 2001: 127).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Freeman and Louc ¸ȃ, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Every approach is underpinned by often implicit ontologies, which are foundational assumptions about the nature of the social world and its causal relationships.
“Every approach is underpinned by (often implicit) ontologies, i.e. foundational assumptions about the nature of the (social) world and its causal relationships (e.g.Burrell and Morgan, 1979;Ritzer, 1980;Collins, 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Burrell and Morgan, 1979
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ritzer, 1980
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Collins, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Causal interaction mechanisms in these system theories tend to be abstract and metaphorical, such as negative feedbacks, positive feedbacks, self-organization, emergence, attractors, and tipping points.
“Causal interaction mechanisms tend to be abstract and metaphorical, e.g.negative feedbacks that stabilize systems, positive feedbacks that amplify initially small changes (resulting in non-linear chaotic behaviour), self-organization, emergence (higher-level system properties arise from component interactions), attractors (that describe dynamic equilibrium states towards which systems tend),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Transitions gather pace when socio-cognitive processes converge into shared views and agreement about the best way forward.
“Transitions gather pace when socio-cognitive processes converge ('closure') into shared views and agreement about the best way forward.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Interpretation precedes decisions and strategies because actors must make sense of data, signals, and situations before acting.
“Interpretation precedes decisions and strategies, because actors need to make sense of data, signals and situations before they take action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The core process for transitions is a shift in belief systems, ideologies and public opinion.
“The core process for transitions is a shift in belief systems, ideologies and public opinion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
As long as incumbents believe problems can be met within the existing regime, their investments and innovation activities remain targeted towards incremental innovations (single loop learning).
“As long as they believe that problems can be met within the existing regime, their investments and innovation activities remain targeted towards incremental innovations (single loop learning).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Transitions may involve changes in the beliefs of incumbent actors.
“Transitions may also involve changes in the beliefs of incumbent actors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Sustainability transitions are hindered by the absence of shared visions.
“Sustainability transitions are hindered by the absence of shared visions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Forms of structuralist thinking are present in neoinstitutional sociological theory, which focuses on shared cognitive frameworks and belief systems.
“Forms of structuralist thinking are also present in neoinstitutional sociological theory (Powell and DiMaggio, 1991;Scott, 1995), which focuses on shared cognitive frameworks and belief systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Powell and DiMaggio, 1991
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scott, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
The struggle for social legitimacy forms a mechanism that links organizational behaviour with broader belief systems and public opinion.
“This struggle for social legitimacy thus forms a mechanism that links organizational behaviour with broader belief systems and public opinion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Early transition phases are characterized by uncertainty and interpretative flexibility around radical innovations.
“Early phases of transitions are characterized by uncertainty and 'interpretative flexibility' around radical innovations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Double loop learning aimed at changing existing beliefs can be facilitated by participation of regime actors in green experimental projects that stretch routines and stimulate reflexivity.
“Double loop learning, aimed at changing existing beliefs, can be facilitated by the participation of regime actors in 'green' experimental projects that stretch existing routines and stimulate reflexivity (Bos and Grin, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bos and Grin, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Cognitions and interpretations are continuously reproduced or modified because cognitive learning and sense-making are ongoing.
“Cognitions and interpretations are continuously reproduced and/or modified because cognitive learning (and sense-making) is ongoing process with actors discussing and interpreting outcomes and experiences (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
In institutional environments, organizations compete for social fitness rather than economic efficiency.
“In institutional environments, organizations thus compete for social fitness rather than economic efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The relevance of relationist and practice theories for large-scale transitions is unclear for three reasons.
“The relevance of relationist and practice theories for large-scale transitions is unclear for three reasons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Most ontologies focus on particular aspects of socio-technical transitions, addressing particular dimensions of this multi-faceted phenomenon.
“But the discussion also showed that most ontologies focus on particular aspects of socio-technical transitions, addressing particular dimensions of this multi-faceted phenomenon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is more difficult for these ontologies to explain socio-technical transitions and discontinuous change.
“It is therefore more difficult for these ontologies to explain socio-technical transitions and discontinuous change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Third, these theories practice a scientific style less focused on developing analytical models and more on criticizing conventional notions and assumptions to make room for new vocabularies.
“Third, these theories practice a scientific style that is less focused on developing analytical models and more on criticizing conventional notions and assumptions to make room for new vocabularies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because relationism and practice theories tend to refrain from developing analytical models, it is difficult to generalize how they understand the dynamics of transitions.
“Because relationism and practice theories tend to refrain from developing analytical models, it is difficult to generalize how they understand the dynamics of transitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Transitions do not occur when incumbent actors are strong enough to marginalize, ignore, or oppress challengers.
“Transitions do not occur when incumbent actors are strong enough to marginalize, ignore or oppress challengers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Change becomes more likely if the economic growth of niches increases their political strength and bargaining power.
“Change then becomes more likely if the economic growth of niches increases their political strength and bargaining power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Incumbent regimes are often stabilized by corporatist networks with mutual dependencies between industry and policy makers.
“Incumbent regimes are often stabilized by corporatist networks with mutual dependencies between industry and policy makers (Meadowcroft, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meadowcroft, 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Some practice theorists have shifted attention in environmental debates to transitions in user practices and everyday life.
“Some practice theorists have shifted the attention in environmental debates to transitions in user practices and everyday life (Shove, 2003; see also Shove and Walker in this special issue).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shove, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Some ontologies appear to have a default orientation towards stability, equilibrium, or incremental change, especially rational choice, structuralism, and functionalism.
“Furthermore, some ontologies appear to have a default orientation towards stability, equilibrium or incremental change, especially rational choice, structuralism and functionalism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
First, these theories typically focus on local practices and projects, such as a French electric vehicle development project or a Parisian public transport project.
“First, these theories typically focus on local practices and projects, e.g. a French electric vehicle development project (Callon, 1980) or a Parisian public transport project (Latour, 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Callon, 1980 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Latour, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Translation of goals into policy instruments can be difficult if environmental problems do not yet hinder the immediate functioning of existing systems.
“The translation of goals into policy instruments can be difficult, however, if the environmental problems do not (yet) hinder the immediate functioning of existing systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Change arises from shifts in the balance of power, which allow challengers to push through transformations of existing structures or overthrow incumbents.
“Change thus arises from shifts in the balance of power, which allow challengers to push through transformations of existing structures (accommodation of new demands) or overthrow incumbents ('revolution').”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Because governments depend on industries to provide employment and economic growth, they often provide favourable conditions and protection.
“Because governments depend on industries to provide employment and economic growth, they often provide favourable conditions and protection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Their explanations typically rely on an external impulse or shock.
“Their explanations typically rely on an external impulse or shock.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Policy frameworks that influence economic frame conditions form an important dimension for struggle and conflict in socio-technical transitions.
“Policy frameworks (regulations, taxes, policy programmes) that influence economic frame conditions form an important dimension for struggle and conflict in socio-technical transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Second, the focus on local practices, fluidity, and contingency makes it difficult to distinguish more generic patterns that span various practices.
“The second problem is that the focus on local practices, fluidity and contingency makes it difficult to distinguish more generic patterns that span various practices.11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For relationism, its explanation of transitions remains unclear.
“For relationism, however, its explanation of transitions remains unclear, as indicated in Section 2.7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The MLP already makes crossovers to the conflict ontology because power and politics form an important dimension of selection environments that stabilize existing regimes and hinder breakthrough of niche-innovations.
“The MLP already makes crossovers to the conflict ontology, because power and politics form an important dimension of selection environments that usually stabilize existing regimes (through corporatist networks and favourable regulations) and hinder the breakthrough of niche-innovations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The crossover allows the MLP to combine evolutionary interest in long-term patterns with interpretive interest in social enactment, sensemaking, and cognitive learning.
“The crossover allows the MLP to combine the evolutionary interest in long-term patterns (trajectories, speciation, invasion, extinction) with an interpretive interest in social enactment, sensemaking, and cognitive learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Full integration is difficult because ontologies are associated with different epistemological and methodological styles.
“Secondly, full integration is difficult because ontologies are associated with different epistemological (and methodological) styles (DiMaggio, 1995), e.g.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DiMaggio, 1995 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The reorientation of incumbent firms will be important for the acceleration and upswing of sustainability transitions.
“An empirical consideration behind this suggestion is that the reorientation of incumbent firms will be important for the acceleration and upswing of sustainability transitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Functionalism makes it difficult to investigate interactions between niches and regimes because it focuses on existing systems and their adaptation to external stresses, not on niches where radical innovations emerge in separation from the system.
“Additionally, functionalism makes it difficult to investigate interactions between niches and regimes, which are crucial in the MLP.The reason is that functionalism and complex systems theory focus on existing systems (such as eco-systems, bird swarms, stock markets) and their adaptation to external stresses or shocks.It does not focus on niches where radical innovations actually emerge in”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In the MLP, trajectories and lineages within levels result from social interactions within semi-coherent rule structures that are recursively reproduced and incrementally adjusted by interpretive actors.
“The trajectories and lineages within the levels result from social (inter)actions within semi-coherent rule structures that are recursively reproduced and incrementally adjusted by interpretive actors (Geels, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geels, 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The MLP originates from the Twente school's quasi-evolutionary theory that aimed to make evolutionary variation-selection-retention mechanisms more sociological via crossovers with interpretivism/constructivism.
“The MLP originates from the Twente school's quasi-evolutionary theory (Rip, 1992;Schot, 1992;Rip and Kemp, 1998) that aimed to make evolutionary variation-selection-retention mechanisms more sociological via crossovers with interpretivism/constructivism (mainly from STS).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Rip, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schot, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rip and Kemp, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The involvement and serious commitment of incumbent firms would speed up the breakthrough of green novelties.
“Their involvement and serious commitment would thus speed up the breakthrough of 'green' novelties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There may be traces of neofunctionalism in the MLP, in that persistent functional problems or tensions in transport, energy, and food systems are seen as one driver for transitions if perceived by actors and placed on agendas.
“There may indeed be traces of neofunctionalism in the MLP, in the sense that persistent functional problems or tensions in transport, energy, and food systems are seen as one of the drivers for transitions if perceived by actors and placed on relevant agendas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The other ontologies have a more intrinsic orientation towards change, which makes their explanation of transitions more endogenous.
“The other ontologies have a more intrinsic orientation towards change, which also makes their explanation of transitions more endogenous.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The MLP's conception of agency (rule/routine-based) differs from the atomistic and calculating view in rational choice.
“In terms of basic assumptions, the conception of agency in the MLP (rule/routine-based) differs from the atomistic and calculat-ing view in rational choice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The MLP does not have to be the sole model for studying transitions.
“I thus agree with Shove and Walker (2007) that the MLP need not be the 'only model in town'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shove and Walker (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Shove's practice theory may be less incompatible with the MLP than Shove claims.
“Also Shove's practice theory may be less incompatible with the multi-level perspective than she suggests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Despite these inspirations, scholars working on the MLP have not actively pursued further crossovers with ANT, mainly because ANT has a flat ontology that denies analytical usefulness of levels, making it difficult to investigate multi-level relations.
“Despite these inspirations, scholars working on the MLP have not actively pursued further crossovers with ANT.The main reason is that ANT has a flat (or folded) ontology, which denies the analytical usefulness of 'levels'.Within ANT it is therefore difficult to investigate multi-level relations between niche-innovations, regimes and landscapes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The MLP is a middle-range theory rather than a grand or unifying theory that synthesizes all available theories.
“The MLP is not a grand theory or unifying framework that synthesizes all available theories, but a middle range theory (Geels, 2007) that addresses a specific topic”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geels, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
In evolutionary economics, entrepreneurial action and the emergence of novelties usually come before and contribute to system collapse.
“An important difference, however, is that entrepreneurial action and the emergence of novelties typically precede, and actually contribute to, system collapse in evolutionary economics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Holling's sequential phases may not apply in the social domain, where actors possess foresight and imagination.
“Hollings sequential phases may thus not hold in the social domain where actors have foresight and imagination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holling, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The micro-focus, flat ontology and complexifying epistemology of relationism complicate crossovers of relationism with the MLP.
“The micro-focus, flat ontology and complexifying epistemology (with suspicions towards analytical models) clearly complicate 14 Genus and Coles (2008) seem unaware of this problem when they suggest that actor-network theory should be integrated in the MLP.crossovers of relationism with the MLP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Even within Shove and Walker's practice approach, one can investigate relations between emerging fluid structures and existing stable structures.
“So, even within their practice approach it is possible to investigate relations between emerging fluid structures (such as London's congestion charging) and existing stable structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Rigorous models can handle narrowly demarcated topics that remain within one ontology, but they struggle with broader, multi-dimensional and complex topics.
“While such rigorous models are possible for demarcated topics that stay within one ontology, they face difficulties with broader, multi-dimensional and complex topics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Porter, 1991 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 185
- May combine two claims. 104
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe three levels of the multi-level perspective refer to heterogeneous configurations of increasing stability.
“These 'levels' refer to heterogeneous configurations of increasing stability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSubsequent struggles between niches and regimes, and possible replacement, take place on multiple dimensions and are enacted by interpretive actors that fight, negotiate, search, learn, and build coalitions.
“Subsequent struggles between niches and regimes, and possible replacement, take place on multiple dimensions (e.g.markets, regulations, cultural meanings, infrastructure) and are enacted by interpretive actors that fight, negotiate, search, learn, and build coalitions as they navigate transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe multi-level perspective distinguishes three analytical levels: niches, socio-technical regimes, and an exogenous socio-technical landscape.
“The MLP distinguishes three analytical levels: niches (the locus for radical innovations), socio-technical regimes, which are locked in and stabilized on several dimensions, and an exogenous socio-technical landscape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe multi-level perspective proposes that transitions, defined as regime shifts, come about through interacting processes within and between the three levels.
“The MLP proposes that transitions, which are defined as regime shifts, come about through interacting processes within and between these levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTransitions do not come about easily because existing regimes are characterized by lock-in and path dependence and are oriented towards incremental innovation along predictable trajectories.
“Transitions do not come about easily, because existing regimes are characterized by lock-in and path dependence, and oriented towards incremental innovation along predictable trajectories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenNiche-innovations may break through more widely if external landscape developments create pressures on the regime that lead to cracks, tensions and windows of opportunity.
“These niche-innovations may break through more widely if external landscape developments create pressures on the regime that lead to cracks, tensions and windows of opportunity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSmith et al. (2005) argued that the multi-level perspective could pay more attention to agency and the role of power in socio-technical transitions.
“Smith et al. (2005) argued that the MLP could pay more attention to agency and the role of power in socio-technical transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. (2005)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe multi-level perspective is a framework for understanding sustainability transitions that provides an overall view of the multi-dimensional complexity of changes in socio-technical systems.
“The multi-level perspective (Rip and Kemp, 1998;Geels, 2002;Geels, 2004;Geels and Schot, 2007) is a framework for understanding sustainability transitions that provides an overall view of the multi-dimensional complexity of changes in socio-technical systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt cannot be taken for granted that all social theories can or should be incorporated into the multi-level perspective.
“While some of these theories may suggest areas for extension of the MLP, it cannot be taken for granted that all theories can or should be incorporated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenShove and Walker did not explicate which systemic theories of change they had in mind.
“Unfortunately, they did not explicate which systemic theories of change they had in mind (the Shove and Walker paper in this special issue advocates practice theories).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenNeo-classical economics conceptualizes transitions as changes in economic structure driven by changing prices of production factors and outputs, in response to which firms change investment strategies and consumers change purchase decisions.
“Neo-classical economics conceptualizes transitions as changes in the economic structure (e.g. the shift from labour to capital), which are driven by changing prices of production factors and outputs, in response to which firms change their investment strategies and consumers change their purchase decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe Freeman and Perez approach has been criticized for technological determinism because of the suggested causality that techno-economic forces do the initial acting and the socio-institutional framework the subsequent reacting.
“The Freeman and Perez (1988) approach has been criticized for technological determinism, because of the suggested causality that techno-economic forces do the initial acting and the socio-institutional framework the subsequent reacting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Freeman and Perez (1988)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPerformance feedback, often via market selection, ultimately determines which innovations are retained and stored in the firm's routines.
“Performance feedback, often via market selection, ultimately determines which innovations are retained and stored in the firm's routines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe strategy literature sees sustainability transitions as strategic dilemmas for firms, who have to balance the risks and opportunities associated with investments.
“The strategy literature sees sustainability transitions as strategic dilemmas for firms, who have to balance the risks and opportunities associated with (sometimes multi-million dollar) investments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenSection 3 positions the multi-level perspective as a crossover approach between evolution theory and interpretivism.
“Section 3 addresses the second question and positions the MLP as a crossover approach between evolution theory and interpretivism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe relationship between the multi-level perspective and relationism is ambiguous, hovering between inspiration and problems.
“The relationship with relationism is ambiguous, hovering between inspiration and problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationShove and Walker (2007) argue for loosening the intellectual grip of innovation studies, backing off from the nested hierarchical multi-level model as the only model, and exploring other social scientific and systemic theories of change.
“Shove and Walker (2007: 768), for instance, argue for “loosening the intellectual grip of 'innovation studies', for backing off from the nested, hierarchical multi-level model as the only model in town, and for exploring other social scientific, but also systemic theories of change” (italics in original, FG).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shove and Walker (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMicro-evolution deals with the mechanisms of variation, selection and retention that underlie genealogical lineages.
“Micro-evolution deals with the mechanisms of variation, selection and retention that underlie genealogical lineages (trajectories).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt may be rational to postpone green investments because of future uncertainties in government regulations, price fluctuations, willingness to pay for green products, and the emergence of green markets.
“On the one hand, it may be rational to postpone 'green' invest-ments because of future uncertainties in government regulations, price fluctuations, the degree to which environmental concerns translate into a willingness to pay more for green products, and the emergence of 'green' markets (Rugman and Verbeke, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rugman and Verbeke, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe multi-level perspective is not the only approach that makes crossovers between ontologies.
“While Section 3 discusses how the MLP makes crossovers to various ontologies, I thus recognize that the MLP is not the only approach that does so.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe multi-level perspective can be fruitfully extended with insights from structuralism and power theories.
“It further argues that the MLP makes no crossovers to rational choice and functionalism, and can be fruitfully extended with insights from structuralism and power theories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTechnoeconomic paradigms refer to configurations of pervasive technologies, methods of production, economic structures, institutions and beliefs that are stable for long periods because certain key factors offer great benefits.
“TEPs refer to configurations of pervasive technologies, methods of production, economic structures, institutions and beliefs that are stable for long periods because certain 'key factors' offer great benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncumbent firms may successfully defend their strategic positions when they possess relevant complementary assets such as specialized manufacturing capability, experience with large-scale test trials, access to distribution channels, service networks, or complementary technologies.
“Other strategy scholars suggest, however, that incumbent firms may successfully defend their strategic positions when they possess relevant complementary assets such as specialized manufacturing capability, experience with large-scale test trials, access to distribution channels, service networks, or complementary technologies (Tripsas, 1997;Rothaermel, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningGreen technology leaders may benefit from first mover advantages such as brand recognition, creation of market positions, technology lead, and creation of patent barriers.
“On the other hand, 'green' technology leaders may benefit from first mover advantages (such as brand recognition, creation of market positions, technology lead, creation of patent barriers) that create favourable positions in future 'green' innovation races.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTo stimulate transitions in sustainable directions, neo-classical economists argue that the conditions under which markets operate should be changed.
“To stimulate transitions in sustainable directions, neo-classical economists therefore argue that the conditions under which the markets operate should be changed (Butter and Hofkes, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Butter and Hofkes, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningNeo-classical economics conceptualizes transitions as gradual adjustment to changing prices.
“In sum, neo-classical economics conceptualizes transitions as gradual adjustment to changing prices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe core drivers for transitions are radical innovations that emerge endogenously from the economic system by entrepreneurial action and lead to creative destruction.
“The core drivers for such transitions are radical innovations, which emerge endogenously from the economic system by entrepreneurial action, and lead to creative destruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNew technologies emerging in particular sectors initially face a degree of mismatch between the techno-economic subsystem and the old socio-institutional framework.
“New technologies, which emerge in particular sectors, initially face “a degree of mismatch between the techno-economic sub-system and the old socio-institutional framework” (p.59).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenEvolutionary economics since the 1980s focused more specifically on the role of technical change and innovation in firm- and industry-level competition.
“While Schumpeter was interested in broad socio-economic change, evolutionary economics since the 1980s focused more specifically on the role of technical change and innovation in firmand industry-level competition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn rational choice, causal agents are self-interested, utilitarian individuals who use instrumental rationality to choose the course of action that maximizes utility with regard to their material preferences, which are considered fixed and given.
“The causal agents in rational choice are self-interested, utilitarian individuals who use instrumental rationality as mechanism to choose the course of action that maximizes utility with regard to their (material) preferences, which are considered fixed and given.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenInnovation studies is well placed to address sustainability transitions, but may also require some conceptual broadening to address the normativity and directionality of these transitions.
“ity transitions, but may also require some conceptual broadening to address the normativity and directionality of these transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenRational choice assumes actors choose between alternatives that readily exist as a given choice-set and have full and free information about alternatives and consequences.
“Actors choose between alternatives that are assumed to readily exist (as a given choice-set).Actors are further assumed to have full and free information about the alternatives and the consequences of their choices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFollowing an evolutionary logic, the process consists of interactions between changes on the variation side and in the selection environment.
“Following an evolutionary logic, the process consists of interactions between changes on the variation side (R&D investments, competence building, knowledge flows, price/performance improvements in 'green' technologies) and in the selection environment (e.g.stricter environmental regulations or changes in user preferences).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThe suggestions for extending the multi-level perspective come from very different social theory traditions with different ontological assumptions about causal agents and causal mechanisms.
“These suggestions come from very different social theory traditions, with different ontological assumptions about causal agents and causal mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn evolutionary economics, actors are boundedly rational because of information processing limitations and use routines, heuristics, and standard operating procedures in decision-making and problem solving.
“The conceptualization of agents builds on the behavioral theory of the firm (Cyert and March, 1963), in which actors are boundedly rational, because of information processing limitations.Actors therefore use routines, heuristics, standard operating procedures in decisionmaking and day-to-day problem solving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cyert and March, 1963
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFreeman and Louçã refined the approach by distinguishing five equally important subsystems: science, technology, economy, politics and culture.
“Freeman and Louc ¸ȃ (2001) therefore refined the approach by distinguishing five equally important 'sub-systems': science, technology, economy, politics and culture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Freeman and Louc ¸ȃ (2001)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNovelties and radical innovations emerge endogenously through speciation, niches and entrepreneurship.
“It argues that novelties and radical innovations emerge endogenously through speciation, niches and entrepreneurship (Cattani, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cattani, 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA broader approach to transitions focuses on shifts in technoeconomic paradigms that span the entire economy.
“A broader approach to transitions focuses on shifts in technoeconomic paradigms (TEP) that span the entire economy (Freeman and Perez, 1988).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Freeman and Perez, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn a neo-classical view, environmental problems are caused by market failures because producers cause negative externalities not reflected in price, and by the public good character of a clean environment.
“In a neo-classical view environmental problems are caused by market failures, because producers are causing negative effects (externalities) that are not reflected in the price, and by the public good character of a clean environment (which leads to 'free rider' effects that limit 'green' investments).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWork on green techno-economic paradigms emphasises the green potential of the ICT paradigm for energy and material savings in existing products and production processes.
“Work on 'green' techno-economic paradigms (Freeman, 1992) emphasises the 'green' potential of the ICT-paradigm for energy and material savings in existing products and production processes (e.g.better monitoring and control, miniaturization, teleworking, teleconferencing).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Freeman, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAttackers are thought to have advantages because they are more agile and flexible in responding to new technologies than incumbent firms for whom initial small markets do not generate enough profits and return-on-investment.
“Attackers are thought to have advantages because they are more agile and flexible in responding to new technologies than incumbent firms for whom the initial small markets do not generate enough profits and return-on-investment (Foster, 1986;Christensen, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Foster, 1986
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Christensen, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFirms are adaptive agents that engage in problemistic search to find solutions to problems, and search processes such as R&D are guided by routines such as search heuristics and resource allocation routines.
“Firms are adaptive agents that engage in problemistic search to find solutions to these problems.Search processes such as R&D, which generate innovations, are also guided by routines such as search heuristics and resource allocation routines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn technological discontinuity approaches, transitions towards sustainability are driven by the development of green technologies.
“In technological discontinuity approaches, transitions towards sustainability are driven by the development of 'green' technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe positioning school addresses transitions in terms of new entrants and new technologies that contest the positions of existing firms and technologies.
“The positioning school, especially as developed in some of the industrial organization literature, addresses transitions in terms of new entrants and new technologies that contest the positions of existing firms and technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe strategy planning school has little to say about transitions because it assumes stable conditions where plans can be made and administered.
“The strategy planning school has little to say about transitions, because it assumes stable conditions where plans can be made and administered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenNeo-classical economics is the main exemplar of rational choice, focusing on rational resource allocation decisions under conditions of scarcity.
“Neo-classical economics is the main exemplar, focusing on rational resource allocation decisions under conditions of scarcity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningMicro-evolution conceptualizes change as incremental adaptation that proceeds through trial-and-error and behavioural learning.
“Micro-evolution thus conceptualizes change as incremental adaptation, which proceeds through trial-and-error and behavioural learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBecause socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena, they can be studied from various angles by different disciplines.
“Because socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena, they can be studied from various angles by different disciplines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFirms that have a green lead may convince policy makers to issue stricter regulations and thus impose imitation costs on competitors.
“Firms that have a 'green' lead may also convince policy makers to issue stricter regulations and thus impose 'imitation costs' on competitors (Puller, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Puller, 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenNot all of the seven ontologies explicitly address sustainability or transitions in their entire socio-technical complexity.
“One qualifier is that not all of these ontologies explicitly address sustainability or transitions in their entire socio-technical complexity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSchumpeter argued that economic evolution is lopsided, discontinuous, disharmonious, studded with violent outbursts and catastrophes, and more like a series of explosions than a gentle transformation.
“Criticizing the gradual adjustment view of neo-classical economics, Schumpeter (1939), for instance, argued that economic “evolution is lopsided, discontinuous, disharmonious by nature. . .studded with violent outbursts and catastrophes. . .more like a series of explosions than a gentle, though incessant, transformation” (p.102).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schumpeter (1939)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCausal mechanisms in ontologies are empirically underspecified, exist outside specific spatial and temporal boundaries, and cannot be directly observed.
““These mechanisms are empirically underspecified, exist outside specific spatial and temporal boundaries, and cannot be directly observed.(. ..) they are treated as ontologically primitive causes of outcomes and associations” (Mahoney, 2004: 461).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mahoney, 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSearch tends to be close to existing routines, localized and incremental, and actors satisfice rather than optimize.
“Search tends to be close to existing routines, localized and incremental: “the probability distribution of what is found is concentrated on techniques close to the current one” (Nelson and Winter, 1982: 211).This means that actors do not optimize, but satisfice: they do not explore the whole search space, but stop searching when they find an alternative that seems satisfactory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelson and Winter, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn evolution theory, the causal agent is a population of heterogeneous agents.
“The causal agent in evolution theory is a population of heterogeneous agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMacro-evolution deals with long-term change patterns such as transformation, speciation, ecological invasion, punctuation and extinction.
“Macro-evolution deals with long-term change patterns such as transformation, speciation, ecological invasion, punctuation and extinction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMarkard and Truffer (2008) argued that incorporation of the technological innovation systems approach into the multi-level perspective might result in an overarching conceptualization and encompassing theoretical framework of socio-technical change.
“Markard and Truffer (2008) argued that incorporation of the technological innovation systems (TIS) approach into the MLP might result in an “overarching conceptualization” and “encompassing theoretical framework of socio-technical change” (p.612).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Markard and Truffer (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMajor mal-adjustments between subsystem dynamics lead to economic crises and opportunities for the breakthrough of major innovations and new technoeconomic paradigms.
“Major mal-adjustments between sub-system dynamics lead to economic crises and opportunities for the breakthrough of major innovations and new TEPs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationParsons distinguished four core functions (AGIL) needed for stable continuation: Adaptation, Goal-attainment, Integration, and Latency.
“For general social systems Parsons (1951) distinguished four core functions (AGIL) that need fulfilment to maintain stable continuation: (1) Adaptation: interaction with nature and produce commodities, (2) Goal-attainment: setting goals and implementing appropriate decisions, (3) Integration: creation of harmony and convergence through shared values and norms, (4) Latency: pattern maintenance over”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Parsons, 1951
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationShifts in belief systems, ideologies and public opinion influence consumer preferences and values and create credibility pressure on and legitimacy for policy makers to introduce strict regulations.
“Such shifts not only influence consumer preferences and values but also create credibility pressure on and legitimacy for policy makers to introduce strict regulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransition management advocates suggest that convergence can be facilitated through participatory visioning exercises, multistakeholder learning processes, and societal debates.
“Transition management advocates (Rotmans et al., 2001) suggest that this process can be facilitated through participatory visioning exercises, multistakeholder learning processes, and societal debates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rotmans et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationComplex systems theory conceptualizes transitions as punctuated equilibria, shifts from one dynamically stable state to another.
“Complex systems theory conceptualizes transitions as punctuated equilibria, shifts from one dynamically stable state to another (Holland, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holland, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningRealization of change also requires spillovers to other domains such as politics and economics.
“While this suggestion resonates with structuralism, which argues that large-scale changes start with new ideas, ideologies and discourses, it also indicates that realization of change also requires spillovers to other domains (e.g.politics, economics).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningNeo-functionalists developed more dynamic frameworks that allow more agency and include crossovers to interpretivism, structuralism, and conflict theories.
“Neo-functionalists therefore developed more dynamic frameworks that allow more agency and include crossovers to interpretivism, structuralism and conflict theories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn the 1960s and 1970s, Parsons's structural-functionalism was criticized for reification, teleology, an over-socialized view of actors, and a bias towards consensus and stability.
“In the 1960s and 1970s, Parson's structural-functionalism was criticized for reification, teleology, an over-socialized view of actors, and a bias towards consensus and stability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile early theorists emphasised isomorphism, conformity and stability, institutional scholars have also begun to investigate variety, change and strategic responses to institutional pressures.
“While early theorists emphasised isomorphism, conformity and stability, institutional scholars have also begun to investigate variety, change and strategic responses to institutional pressures (Greenwood and Hinings, 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greenwood and Hinings, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDynamic system theories emerged from the natural and technical sciences, including system dynamics, integrated systems theory, soft systems approaches, and complex systems theory.
“Dynamic system theories also emerged from the natural and technical sciences, e.g.system dynamics, integrated systems theory, soft systems approaches and complex systems theory (Holland, 1995;Kauffman, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Holland, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kauffman, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStructural anthropology aims to uncover the cultural deep grammar made up of binary opposites.
“One examplar is structural anthropology, which aims to uncover the cultural 'deep grammar' made up of 'binary' opposites (Lévi-Strauss, 1963).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lévi-Strauss, 1963
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMorel and Ramanujam characterize complexity theory as a heterogeneous ensemble of exciting observations that need further operationalization beyond metaphors for broader application in the social domain.
“Morel and Ramanujam (1999) therefore characterize complexity theory as a heterogeneous ensemble of exciting observations, which, however, need further operationalization beyond the metaphors for broader application in the social domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Morel and Ramanujam, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuch a shift would require greater urgency about new environmental problems and widespread beliefs that radical green innovations are feasible and desirable.
“such a shift would require a greater sense of urgency about the new environmental problems and widespread beliefs that radical 'green' innovations are feasible and desirable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFunctionalism's causal agent is the social system, and its causal mechanism is the fulfillment of system needs/goals by actors who fulfill functions, tasks, or roles.
“The causal agent in functionalism is the social system.The causal mechanism is the fulfillment of system needs/goals by actors who fulfil functions, tasks or roles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEvolutionary theory assumes bounded rationality, while interpretivism focuses on intersubjective sense-making and symbolic constructions of reality.
“While evolutionary theory assumes 'bounded rationality' (based on information processing limitations), interpretivism/constructivism focuses on intersubjective sense-making and symbolic constructions of reality through which people create shared interpretations (Berger and Luckman, 1967).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berger and Luckman, 1967
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is not one green innovation around which opinions coalesce; instead there are multiple green options appraised differently by various social groups.
“There is not one 'green' innovation around which opinions coalesce.Instead, there are multiple 'green' options, which are appraised differently by various social groups.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningFunctionalism tends to assume a top-down cockpit view with benevolent leaders and experts adjusting systems in appropriate directions (technocracy).
“Functionalism thus tends to assume a top-down 'cockpit' view with benevolent leaders and experts adjusting systems in appropriate directions (technocracy).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGiddens's structuration theory defines structures as rules and resources and sees actors as knowledgeable agents who interpret and tailor rules to specific contexts.
“Giddens's (1984) structuration theory is an interpretive approach that makes crossovers to structural ontologies, defining structures somewhat abstractly as 'rules and resources'.Actors are seen as knowledgable agents who actively draw upon rules in concrete interactions.They interpret and tailor rules to the demands of specific contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giddens, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSCOT argues that social groups attach different meanings to new technologies, leading to clashing opinions and debates that create uncertainty and prevent full commitments.
“The social construction of technology (SCOT) approach, for instance, argues that social groups attach different meanings to new technologies (Bijker, 1995), leading to clashing opinions and heated debates, which create uncertainty and prevent full commitments from policy makers, consumers, and investors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bijker, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFreeman highlights the importance of long-term policy frameworks, high-level government support, long-term technology programs with a variety of participants, and strong support of public opinion.
“Although he does not spell out the dynamics of these green system innovations, Freeman does highlight the importance of long-term policy frameworks, highlevel government support, long-term technology programs with a variety of participants, and strong support of public opinion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIn structuralism, cognitive deep structures are the causal agents, operating behind the backs of individual actors and defining what is desirable, acceptable and legitimate.
“These cognitive 'deep structures' are therefore the causal agents, operating 'behind the backs' of individual actors and defining what is desirable, acceptable and legitimate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningStructuration theory maintains active interpretive dynamics while actors are embedded in rules.
“While actors are seen as embedded in rules, structuration theory thus maintains active and interpretive dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenSustainability transitions may require a shift from the dominant neo-liberal/globalization agenda to a sustainable development/social transformation agenda.
“sustainability transitions may require a shift towards the second agenda.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenStructuralism argues that large-scale changes start with new ideas, ideologies and discourses.
“While this suggestion resonates with structuralism, which argues that large-scale changes start with new ideas, ideologies and discourses, it also indicates that realization of change also requires spillovers to other domains (e.g.politics, economics).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese criticisms tainted functionalism's reputation and made it suspicious in social theory.
“These criticisms tainted the reputation of functionalism and made it 'suspicious' in social theory.7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationSustainability is an ambiguous and contested concept.
“Sustainability is an ambiguous and contested concept.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSustainability transitions should be seen as deliberative social learning processes, not technocratic challenges.
“Sustainability transitions should therefore not be seen as technocratic challenges, but as deliberative social learning processes (Stirling, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stirling, 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInterpretivism perceives actors as creative and continuously engaged in sense-making.
“interpretivism/constructivism perceives actors as creative and continuously engaged in sense-making (Weick, 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weick, 1979
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLater scholars argued that suspicion of functionalism makes it difficult to ask questions about larger social constellations.
“Later scholars (e.g.Mouzelis, 1995) argued, however, that the baby may have been thrown out with the bathwater and that the suspicion of functionalism makes it difficult to ask questions about larger social constellations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mouzelis, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLearning includes behavioural learning (learning-by-doing) and cognitive learning (action, reflection, sensemaking).
“Learning not only includes behavioural learning (learning-by-doing which evolutionary theories operationalize through search and performance feedback), but also cognitive learning (which emphasizes action, reflection and sensemaking) (Schön, 1983;Gavetti and Levinthal, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schön, 1983
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gavetti and Levinthal, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFunctionalism assumes a division of tasks and responsibilities, but all groups are impelled to contribute to the overall goal of stable functioning of the social system.
“Although functionalism assumes a division of tasks and responsibilities, all groups are impelled to contribute to the overall goal: stable functioning of the social system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenStructuralism perceives actors as part of social collectives that share particular belief systems, symbolic sets and cultural categories that provide meaning and a sense of direction.
“Structuralism perceives actors as part of social collectives that share particular belief systems, symbolic sets and cultural categories that provide meaning and a sense of direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBraudel distinguishes three phases in the transition to welfare states: an ideological phase, a mobilization phase, and a political/governmental phase.
“Braudel (1993), for instance, distinguishes three phases in the transition to welfare states: (1) the ideological phase (1815-1870), where social reformers drew attention to poverty-related problems and developed new ideas and vocabularies with words like industrialist, capitalist, exploitation, proletariat, the masses, and Socialism; (2) the phase of mobilization , where militant labor (trade un”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Braudel (1993)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFreeman acknowledges that incremental improvement of existing systems will not be enough to achieve the needed scale of reduction in energy and materials consumption in industrial countries during the twenty-first century, and that radical innovations including new transport, construction and industrial systems will be needed.
“But in his conclusions, Freeman (1992: 207) acknowledges that this is not sufficient: “the incremental improvement of existing systems will not be enough to achieve the scale of reduction in energy and materials consumption which will be needed in the industrial countries during the twenty-first century.Radical innovations will be needed including new transport, construction and industrial systems”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Freeman (1992)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn structural-functionalism, change is caused by external disturbances that disrupt equilibriums, create tensions, and change system needs; the system then adjusts and settles into a new equilibrium.
“In structural-functionalism, change is caused by external disturbances that disrupt equilibriums, create tensions, and change system needs.The system then adjusts through changes in the Goalattainment and Adaptation-functions and settles down in a new equilibrium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationActors have different interpretations of the balance between social, economic, and environmental sustainability, different rankings of environmental problems, and different views about solutions and policy packages.
“Actors not only have different interpretations of the right balance between social, economic and environmental sustainability, but also have different rankings of environmental problems and hold different views about the (dis)advantages of particular solutions and the most appropriate policy packages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningModern societies have developed industries, markets, science, and technology for Adaptation; political institutions for Goal-attainment; religion and civil society for Integration; and schools and families for Latency.
“Modern societies have developed industries, markets, science and technology for Adaptation; political institutions for Goal-attainment; religion and civil society for Integration; and schools and families for Latency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWeber argued that shifts in societal beliefs, ideas and ideologies may influence the direction of societal development.
“In his famous switchmen metaphors, Weber argued that shifts in societal beliefs, ideas and ideologies may influence the direction of societal development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weber
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome claim complex systems theory can be applied to economic, ecological, and social systems, but the operationalization of actors tends to be abstract with few concrete sociological characteristics.
“While some claim that complex systems theory can be applied to economic, ecological and social systems (Holling, 2001), the operationalization of actors tends to be abstract and with few concrete sociological characteristics (Horgan, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThese system theories address dynamic interactions between system elements, whereas functionalism distinguishes separate domains and sub-systems.
“Whereas functionalism distinguishes separate domains and sub-systems, these system theories address dynamic interactions between system elements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMacro-historians suggest that ideological and cultural changes often create an initial impetus for societal change.
“Also macro-historians suggest that ideological and cultural changes often create an initial impetus for societal change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor deliberate transitions, political leaders and experts develop new goals and use science and technology to adjust the economic sub-system; the new system is anchored in new behavioural norms and values through Integration and Latency.
“For deliberate (purposive) transitions, political leaders (Holling, 2001: 394). and experts develop new goals and subsequently use science and technology to adjust the economic sub-system.The new system is then anchored in new behavioural norms and values through the internally oriented functions (Integration, Latency).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenInteractive mechanisms in interpretivism are conversations, debates, negotiations, and learning processes.
“Interactive mechanisms are conversations, debates, negotiations, and learning processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConformity to cognitive institutions confers legitimacy, which helps firms create public acceptance, political protection and venture capital mobilization.
“Conformity to cognitive institutions confers legitimacy, which help firms to create public acceptance, political protection and venture capital mobilization (Suchman, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suchman, 1995 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep ecology and eco-centrist approaches reject Modernism and advocate deep green lifestyles, localism, and decentralized renewable energy.
“More radical cultural shifts are advocated by 'deep ecology' and eco-centrist approaches (Katz et al., 2000), which reject 'Modernism' (based on economic growth, science, technical progress) and advocate 'deep green' life styles, localism and decentralized renewable energy options.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Katz et al., 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningInterpretivism/constructivism is an agency-oriented ontology interested in meaning.
“The interpretive/constructivist ontology is, like structuralism, interested in 'meaning', but it takes a more agency-oriented approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWhen internal dynamics create rigidities or vulnerabilities, external shocks may lead to system collapse, release of accumulated resources, and a shift towards a new basin of attraction.
“When internal dynamics create rigidities (reducing the system's adaptive potential) or vulnerabilities (moving the system towards thresholds), external shocks may lead to system collapse, the release of accumulated resources and a shift towards a new 'basin of attraction'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningStruggles, plotting, and coalition building appear as a dimension of all social domains where people have conflicting interests.
“Struggles, plotting, and coalition building thus appeared as a dimension of all social domains where people have conflicting interests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThese scholars ask for more analytical attention to the 'socio' in socio-technical transitions and for analysis of the construction of 'normality' in user practices.
“These scholars therefore ask for more analytical attention to the 'socio' in socio-technical transitions and for analysis of the construction of 'normality' in user practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningCorporatist networks may also change because of credibility pressure from public opinion and the electorate.
“Corporatist networks may also change because of credibility pressure from public opinion (see the discussion under structuralism) and the electorate, the other constituency policy makers depend on.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn the growth phase, entrepreneurs exploit new opportunities, gradually leading to the emergence of a new system guided by an attractor.
“In the growth phase, entrepreneurs exploit new opportunities, gradually leading to the emergence of a new system (guided by an attractor).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenRelationist theories contain no exogenous causes because everything is endogenized in terms of networks and ongoing relations.
“Relationist theories contain no exogenous causes, because everything is endogenized in terms of networks and ongoing relations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationResilience Alliance scholars argue for adaptive management of socio-environmental systems based on diversity, learning, flexibility, and stakeholder involvement.
“Acknowledging non-linear dynamics and uncertainties in complex systems, scholars in the Resilience Alliance (www.resalliance.org/1.php)argue for adaptive management of socio-environmental systems based on diversity, learning, flexibility, stakeholder involvement (Berkes et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berkes et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningConflict and power scholars have made crossovers to other ontologies.
“Conflict and power scholars have thus made crossovers to other ontologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn a functionalist logic, external environmental shocks and disasters may be needed to achieve sustainability transitions.
“In a functionalist logic (external) environmental shocks and disasters may therefore be needed to achieve sustainability transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenConflict theories are opposites of functionalism: they see processes and struggles rather than static society, contestation and conflict rather than orderliness, and order arising from coercion rather than shared norms, values, and goals.
“Conflict theories are opposites of functionalism in various respects.Where functionalism sees society as static, conflict theories see processes and struggles; where functionalism emphasizes the orderliness of society, conflict theorists see contestation and conflict; where functionalism sees society as being held together by norms, values and shared goals, conflict scholars argue that order”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHård developed a social conflict approach that criticized SCOT for analyzing interpretive closure processes as consensual negotiation and highlighted power struggles as a closure mechanism in technological change.
“In a similar vein, Hård (1993) developed a social conflict approach that criticized the Social Construction of Technology Approach for analyzing interpretive closure processes in terms of consensual negotiation and highlighted power struggles as closure mechanism in technological change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hård, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHolling portrays an adaptive cycle supposed to hold for all complex adaptive systems, consisting of four phases: exploitation/growth, accumulation/conservation, collapse/release, and renewal/reorganization.
“Holling (2001) schematically portrays an adaptive cycle, which is supposed to hold for all complex adaptive systems and consists of four phases: exploitation/growth, accumulation/conservation, collapse/release and renewal/reorganization (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holling, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAs connections increase and resources accumulate, systems gain stability and move into the conservation phase, a semi-stable equilibrium that may persist for a long time.
“As connections increase and resource accumulate, systems gain stability and move into the conservation phase, characterized by a semi-stable equilibrium that may persist for a long time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the last 50-100 years, people experienced and enacted major shifts in social practices such as bathing and showering, office heating and cooling, and laundry, leading to major increases in the use of chemicals, water, and energy.
“In the last 50-100 years, people experienced and enacted major shifts in social practices such as bathing and showering, office heating and cooling, and the laundry, leading to major increases in the use of chemicals, water, and energy (Shove, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shove, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile Neo-Marxist theories tend to focus on collective actors, other conflict theorists shifted focus to micro-power and conflicts between self-interested individuals.
“While Neo-Marxist theories tend to focus on collective actors, other conflict theorists shifted the focus to 'micro-power' (Collins, 1975) and conflicts between self-interested individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collins, 1975
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPractice approaches have been extended to user practices, conceptualized as fluid constellations of material objects/technologies, symbolic meanings and images, and user competence/skills.
“Practice approaches have also been extended to user practices, which are conceptualized as fluid constellations of material objects/technologies, symbolic meanings and images, and user competence/skills (Shove and Pantzar, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shove and Pantzar, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThis short collapse phase is followed by reorganization of elements and resources through self-organization, experimentation, and new combinations.
“This short phase is followed by reorganization of elements and resources (self-organization, experimentation, new combinations).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWhile relationism criticizes other ontologies for reification and essentialism, other ontologies criticize relationism for relativism and limited explanatory potential.
“While relationism criticizes other ontologies for reification and essentialism, other ontologies criticize relationism for relativism and limited explanatory potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningNiche actors lobby for subsidies or favourable regulations but are usually less influential because they have less political and economic clout.
“Niche actors, who also lobby for subsidies or favourable regulations, are usually less influential, because they have less political and economic clout.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningANT talks of human and non-human actants and conceptualizes innovation as a complex alignment process of heterogeneous elements.
“ANT therefore talks of human and non-human 'actants' and conceptualizes innovation as complex alignment process of heterogeneous elements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAlthough the purpose is to prevent transitions understood as collapse of productive eco-systems, these suggestions have similarities with transition management that aims to stimulate transitions to more sustainable systems.
“Although the purpose is to prevent transitions (understood as collapse of productive eco-systems), it is interesting that these suggestions have similarities with transition management (Rotmans et al., 2001) that aims to stimulate transitions to more sustainable systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rotmans et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFiguration sociology argues that actors are caught up in social figurations characterized by emergent characteristics and unintended consequences.
“One exemplar is figuration sociology (Elias, 1978), which argues that actors are caught up in social figurations characterized by emergent characteristics and unintended consequences:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Elias, 1978
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationANT conceptualizes the world as flat (or folded) and refutes the notion of institutions or structural levels.
“ANT, for example, conceptualises the world as 'flat' (or folded) and refutes the notion of institutions or structural levels:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Callon, 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenPractice theories focus on local practices and everyday lifeworlds, highlighting mechanisms such as improvisation, tinkering, bricolage, and repair work.
“Practice theories form another exemplar, focusing on local practices and everyday lifeworlds, and highlighting mechanisms such as improvisation, tinkering, bricolage, and repair work (see also Shove and Walker in this special issue).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThey use terms such as horizontal circulation, interconnectedness of many elements, active integration of constitutive elements, and practices have emergent and uncontrollable trajectories to hint at interesting dynamics.
“They use terms such as 'horizontal circulation', 'interconnectedness of many elements', 'active integration of constitutive elements', and 'practices have emergent and uncontrollable trajectories' to hint at interesting dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningBecause these terms are more descriptive than explanatory, it remains unclear how they can be used to analyse the dynamics of convention beyond the empirical mapping of individual cases.
“But because these terms are more descriptive than explanatory, it remains unclear how they can be used to 'analyse the dynamics of convention' in a way that goes beyond the empirical mapping of individual cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe problem for sustainability transitions is that many unsustainable industries have many economic resources and good political contacts, which may hinder, delay, or water down strict environmental regulations.
“The problem for sustainability transitions is that many unsustainable industries have many economic resources and good political contacts, which may hinder, delay or water down strict environmental regulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTheories may therefore be defamiliarizing and rich in paradox.
“Theories may therefore be defamiliarizing and rich in paradox.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenConflict and power ontology's causal agents are collective actors with conflicting goals and interests; the core mechanism is conflict and power struggle, with dominant groups using power to protect their interests against subordinate groups seeking change.
“Causal agents in the conflict and power ontology are collective actors (classes, industry associations, social movements, special-interest groups) with conflicting goals and interests.The core mechanism is conflict and power struggle, with dominant groups using power (force, domination, control, exclusion) to protect their interests against subordinate groups that seek change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThis work focuses more on adaptation than mitigation, asking how socio-environmental systems should adapt to stresses from natural resource exploitation or environmental change.
“This work focuses more on adaptation than mitigation, asking how socioenvironmental systems should adapt to stresses that come from natural resource exploitation or environmental change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile individual moves and specific events can be explained with causal mechanisms, the interweaving of individual moves leads to event sequences and aggregated processes that are not foreseen or controlled.
“While moves by individual actors and specific events can be explained with causal mechanisms (e.g.calculation, power struggles, interpretation), the interweaving of individual moves leads to event sequences and aggregated processes that are not foreseen or controlled.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWhile it is doable to empirically follow the actors in these projects, this method creates practical problems for large-scale transitions with many thousands of actors.
“While it is doable to empirically 'follow the actors' in these projects, this method creates practical problems for large-scale transitions with many thousands of actors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe previous sections demonstrated the breadth of generic social science traditions and how their insights can be related to socio-technical transitions and sustainability.
“The previous sections demonstrated the breath of generic social science traditions and how their insights can be related to sociotechnical transitions and sustainability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis abstract representation shows family resemblances to Schumpeterian waves of creative destruction but has deterministic and teleological overtones because specific social mechanisms remain underspecified.
“This abstract representation shows family resemblances to Schumpeterian waves of creative destruction.8 But since specific social mechanisms remain underspecified, it also has deterministic and teleological overtones (related to attractors and predetermined phases).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe environmental sense of urgency will be lower than for functional problems such as congestion or energy security that directly affect transport and energy systems.
“The environmental sense of urgency will then be lower than for functional problems such as congestion or energy security that directly affect transport and energy systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenVarious conflict and power theories highlight different sources of power and different social groups.
“There are various conflict and power theories, which highlight different sources of power and different social groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationShove and Walker's commentary suggests that changes in social practices come about through integration or erosion of various elements or ingredients.
“Their commentary suggests that changes in social practices come about through integration (or erosion) of various 'elements' or 'ingredients'.12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRøpke argues that the environmental debate is skewed towards supply-side issues, ignoring major unsustainable demand-side changes that led to larger housing areas, more household equipment, higher meat consumption, greater mobility, and more long-distance travel.
“Also Røpke (2001) argues that the environmental debate is skewed towards supplyside issues, ignoring major (unsustainable) demand-side changes that led to larger housing areas, more household equipment, higher meat consumption, greater mobility, more long-distance travel, etc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Røpke, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDynamic networks are primary; actors are secondary.
“Dynamic networks are primary, actors secondary.10”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMarx emphasized power related to material resources, arguing that capitalists who own property and means of production control workers who must sell their labour.
“Marx, for instance, emphasised the power related to material resources, arguing that capitalists who own property and 'means of production' have control over workers who must sell their labour to earn a living.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNew vocabularies and concepts can be criticized for empiricism: good at description, weak at explanation.
“The new vocabulairies and concepts can, however, be criticized for empiricism: good at description, weak at explanation (Collins and Yearley, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collins and Yearley, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenCausal mechanisms in relationism emphasize processes such as alignment, enrolment, attachments, translation, co-construction, and mutual constitution.
“Causal mechanisms emphasise processes such as alignment, enrolment, attachments, translation, co-construction and mutual constitution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSustainability transitions in the conflict/power ontology may require either increasing pressure from public opinion on policy makers or further growth of green niches into important economic sectors that can successfully lobby for regulatory changes.
“Sustainability transitions in this ontology may thus require either increasing pressure from public opinion on policy makers or further growth of 'green' niches into important economic sectors that can successfully lobby for further regulatory changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRelationism assumes that the identity, preferences, and interests of individual actors are fluid and constituted by relations and ongoing interactions, which are therefore the causal agent.
“Relationism instead assumes that the identity, preferences and interests of individual actors are fluid and constituted by relations and ongoing interactions, which are therefore the causal agent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationANT develops a relationist view that includes materiality; humans shape artefacts, and artefacts shape humans.
“An exemplar in the STI-field is actor-network theory (e.g.Latour, 1987).While Elias looks at social figurations, ANT develops a relationist view that includes materiality (artefacts, technology).In this view, humans not only shape artefacts, but artefacts also shape humans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Latour, 1987
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFor sustainability transitions, structural-functionalism argues that societies, especially policy makers, should set overarching environmental goals.
“For sustainability transitions, structural-functionalism argues that societies, especially policy makers, should set overarching environmental goals (e.g. the Kyoto Protocol, Millennium Development Goals).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRelationism is a non-essentialist process ontology that criticizes other ontologies for assuming foundational attributes and searching for ultimate causes.
“Relationism is a non-essentialist process ontology, which criticizes other ontologies for assuming that people have foundational attributes and for (fruitlessly) searching for ultimate causes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCritical theorists from the Frankfurt school emphasized cultural dimensions of power and oppression, especially the rise of culture industries and instrumental rationality.
“Critical theorists from the Frankfurt school (e.g.Horkheimer and Adorno, 1947) also emphasized the cultural dimensions of power and oppression, in particular the rise of culture industries and instrumental rationality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Horkheimer and Adorno, 1947
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHegelian Marxists such as Gramsci argued that stability of the status quo comes not only from economic domination and state coercion but also from hegemony, ideology, and belief systems that make existing structures look natural and prevent new class consciousness.
“In response to Marx's presumed economic determinism (with technical and economic 'substructures' driving change in institutional and cultural 'superstructures'), Hegelian Marxists such as Gramsci (1932) argued that stability of the status quo not only comes from economic domination and state coercion, but also from 'hegemony', ideology and belief systems that make existing structures look 'natural”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gramsci, 1932
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe emerging new configuration provides new opportunities for entrepreneurs.
“The emerging new configuration then provides new opportunities for entrepreneurs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe MLP's embeddedness view does not deny the possibility of rational choice; rational choice can be a special case in stable rule structures that enable calculation.
“But the MLP's embeddedness view does not necessarily deny the possibility of 'rational choice'.Instead, rational choice can be a special case in the context of stable rule structures that enable calculation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEclecticism can produce workable frameworks for particular purposes, but ad-hoc combinations risk producing inconsistent frameworks and remaining fuzzy about dynamic relationships between very different dimensions.
“The third position, eclecticism, can produce workable frameworks for particular purposes (like good engineers can sometimes combine technical elements without caring too much about the underlying scientific foundations).The risk, however, is that ad-hoc combinations produce inconsistent frameworks and remain fuzzy about dynamic relationships between very different dimensions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenStrategic reorientation of incumbent firms is unlikely until existing regimes begin to destabilize.
“But such strategic reorientation is unlikely until existing regimes begin to destabilize.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLevinthal (1992) suggests that development of new knowledge and competences usually precedes changes in strategy and mission, providing internal resources for reorientation.
“Levinthal (1992) suggests that the development of new knowledge and competences usually precedes such changes in strategy and mission, because this provides the internal resources for reorientation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levinthal (1992) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough the multi-dimensionality of niche-regime-landscape interactions is a strength of the MLP, it is conceptualized in a general and heuristic sense, so the MLP could benefit from conceptual extensions of multi-level interaction on various dimensions.
“Although the multi-dimensionality of niche-regime-landscape interactions is a strength of the MLP, this is conceptualized in a general and heuristic sense.The MLP could therefore benefit from conceptual extensions of multi-level interaction on various dimensions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenTheory as narrative explains social processes as sequences of events enacted by social groups, with emphasis on intentions, motivations, hermeneutics, Verstehen, analytical generalization, and dynamic patterns.
“(b) 'theory as narrative', which explains social processes as sequences of events that are enacted by social groups; the methodological emphasis is on intentions and motivations (hermeneutics, Verstehen), analytical generalization, and dynamic patterns”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough rational choice has limited relevance for understanding transitions, the MLP could accommodate it at the regime level during stable periods and for diffusion phases, but since evolutionary economics can explain both aspects, the MLP does not really need rational choice, and rational choice offers few insights into niche-regime interactions.
“Although rational choice has limited relevance for understanding transitions (eras of ferment), the MLP could accommodate rational choice at the regime level during stable periods.Rational choice may also offer insights for the diffusion phases of new technologies: once dominant designs and new institutions have stabilized, policy makers and firms are better able to make costbenefit calculations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe fourth position, inter-ontology crossovers, focuses on interactions between ontologies, recognizes differences but works on dynamic interplay rather than overarching synthesis, and is particularly fruitful for multi-dimensional phenomena such as socio-technical transitions.
“The fourth position, inter-ontology crossovers, focuses on interactions between ontologies (Gioia and Pitre, 1990;Lewis and Grimes, 1999).Crossover approaches recognize differences between ontologies, but work on dynamic interplay rather than overarching synthesis.Ontologies are not perceived as pieces in a jigsaw puzzle, but also not accepted as fully incommensurable.Instead, this position is”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gioia and Pitre, 1990 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lewis and Grimes, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe MLP does not make crossovers to functionalism.
“I therefore argue that the MLP does not make crossovers to functionalism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe MLP is not a functionalist framework because it does not assume all actors work towards shared system goals, has no teleology, and no bias towards stability; coordinating regime rules are semi-coherent, allowing tensions and conflicts.
“But the MLP is not a functionalist framework because it does not assume that all actors work towards shared system goals, has no teleology, and no bias towards stability.Coordinating regime rules are described as semi-coherent, which allows for possible tensions and conflicts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRational choice may hold for periods of incremental change when socio-institutional structures form stable backgrounds, but faces problems for periods of ferment when flux, uncertainty and fluidity complicate cost-benefit calculations.
“Using the punctuated equilibrium framework, we can say that rational choice may hold for periods of incremental change when socio-institutional structures form stable backgrounds that allow rational calculation (Fig. 3).But it faces problems for periods of ferment, when background structures are opened up and social, political and organizational processes gain prominence.The accompanying flux,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFull integration into an encompassing theory is difficult because some ontologies focus on individual actors while others focus on larger wholes and collectives, and some focus on objective reality and material interests while others see reality as inter-subjectively created.
“The first position, full integration into an encompassing theory, is difficult, because some ontologies focus on individual actors, others on larger wholes and collectives; some focus on 'objective' reality and material interests, while others see reality as inter-subjectively created.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe MLP already makes ad-hoc crossovers to structuralism, incorporating macro-cultural changes at the landscape level.
“The MLP already makes ad-hoc crossovers to structuralism, incorporating macro-cultural changes at the landscape level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe incommensurability position assumes that interaction between ontologies is impossible, privileges normal science, hinders theoretical innovation through new combinations, and tends towards reductionism and constant-cause explanations, which are problematic for heterogeneous topics such as socio-technical transitions.
“The second position, incommensurability, assumes that interaction between ontologies is impossible.It thus privileges 'normal science' that stays within existing paradigms and hinders theoretical innovations through 'new combinations' between ontologies.It also tends towards reductionism (emphasising single causes) and constant-cause explanations (assuming that one causal mechanism operates contin”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn the MLP, the landscape level refers to deep structural dimension of culture, while actors at regime and niche levels engage in cultural actions, developing discourses that draw on deep cultural categories and frame issues to confer legitimacy.
“While the MLP's landscape level refers to the deep structural dimension of culture, actors at regime and niche levels engage in cultural actions, developing discourses that draw on deep cultural categories and frame issues in such a way as to confer legitimacy to their actions and/or technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSocial movements start as outsiders, tend to use non-institutionalized action to exert pressure; early SMT scholars highlighted resource mobilization; other scholars demonstrated influence related to political opportunity structures; cultural framing defines cognitive space; social movements can contest dominant ideology and create legitimacy pressures; technology-oriented scholars drew attention
“Because social movements start as outsiders to existing orders, they tend to use non-institutionalized action (protest marches, blockades, strikes, petitions) to exert pressure for change.Early SMT scholars highlighted the mobilization of resources (members, money, expertise) as the main mechanism for increasing the pressure (McCarthy and Zald, 1977).To complement this 'internal push' mechanism,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAttempts at integration (e.g., Bourdieu, Alexander) have been criticised for abstract theorising about philosophical principles rather than sociological mechanisms, for coining new words that restate foundational tensions without solving them, and for a general dissociation from empirical research.
“Attempts at integration (e.g.Bourdieu, Alexander) have been criticised for abstract theorising about philosophical principles rather than sociological mechanisms, for coining new words that restate foundational tensions without solving them, and for a general dissociation from empirical research (Burger, 1986;Van den Berg, 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Burger, 1986 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van den Berg, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningComplex systems theory constitutes an alternative way of investigating transitions, with similarities and differences to the MLP.
“I therefore suggest that complex systems theory constitutes an alternative way of investigating transitions, with intriguing similarities but also differences to the MLP (see Sections 2.5.2 and 2.5.3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the MLP, actors are knowledgeable agents who interpret and apply rules creatively within constraints, and retention is an interpretive, negotiated and contested process of institutionalization.
“Actors are not cultural dopes who passively follow rules.Instead, they are knowledgeable agents (Giddens, 1984), who interpret and apply rules creatively (although within constraints).Retention is not only a process of 'retaining what works' (as in behavioural theory), but also an interpretive, negotiated and contested process of institutionalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giddens, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe MLP accommodates both behavioural learning and cognitive learning, and between levels there is an evolutionary logic with niche-innovations providing variety that interacts with selection environments, while creation of fit is also an enacted and multidimensional process.
“This accommodates both behavioural learning ('trial-and-error' dynamics from evolution theory) and cognitive learning (sense-making from interpretivism).Between the levels there is an evolutionary logic, with heterogeneous niche-innovations providing (radical) variety that interacts with broader selection environments (at regime and landscape levels).But the creation of fit between variations and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDiscourse analysts added interactive dimensions by addressing collective sensemaking; interpretations sediment into discourses, which contain deep structural elements framed by actors; discursive framing is contested, and discursive struggles influence cultural legitimacy, public support, political protection or financial resources.
“Discourse analysts added interactive dimensions by addressing collective sensemaking around specific issues.Because collective sense-making is an ongoing process, the interpretations sediment into particular discourses, i.e. ways of talking and thinking about issues (Hajer, 1995).Discourses contain deep structural elements that are framed by actors in particular ways.This discursive framing is a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hajer, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suchman, 1995 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lounsbury and Glynn, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationRegime actors develop discourses that maintain or restore legitimacy when faced with problems or criticisms; social movements and niche actors try to delegitimate the regime by framing industry practices as insufficient, outdated, irresponsible, or unacceptable; niche actors engage in cultural framing to enhance legitimacy of niche-innovations, which initially suffer from liability of newness and低
“Regime actors develop discourses that maintain or restore legitimacy when they are faced with problems or criticisms (television debates, advertisements).Social movements and niche actors try to delegimate the regime by framing industry practices or responses to problems as 'insufficient', 'outdated', 'irresponsible', or 'unacceptable' (Oliver, 1992).Niche actors also engage in cultural framing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTheory as enlightenment aims to clear away conventional notions, uncover hidden structures, or introduce unconventional, creative, and surprising frameworks.
“(c) 'theory as enlightenment', which aims to clear away conventional notions, uncover hidden structures, or introduce unconventional, creative and surprising frameworks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningIncumbent firms in the car, electricity, and food industries possess many complementary assets relevant for the upscaling and commercialization of green niche-innovations.
“The reason is that incumbent firms in the car, electricity, and food industries posses many complementary assets (see Section 2.1) that are relevant for the upscaling and commercialization of green niche-innovations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWork on dynamic capabilities and ambidextrous organizations shows that incumbent firms can overcome lock-in mechanisms and that deliberate changes in firm strategy are crucial for reorientation.
“This work not only shows that incumbent firms can overcome the lock-in mechanisms that tie them to existing technological regimes, but also suggest that deliberate changes in firm strategy are crucial for reorientation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Teece et al., 1997 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tushman and O'Reilly, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe crossover between evolution theory and interpretivism is facilitated by similarities in ontological assumptions: both assume creative and heterogeneous actors, acknowledge embeddedness in regimes, focus on process over time, and can explain incremental and radical change.
“This crossover is facilitated by similarities in ontological assumptions.Most importantly, both ontologies assume creative and heterogeneous actors, but also acknowledge the embedded-ness of actors in regimes.Furthermore, both have an intrinsic focus on process and development over time, and can explain both incremental and radical change (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe previously discussed ontologies refer to foundational positions and assumptions about the properties of causal agents and causal mechanisms in the social world.
“The previously discussed ontologies refer to foundational positions and assumptions about the properties of causal agents and causal mechanisms in the social world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the MLP, variation is guided by expectations, visions and beliefs; selection occurs in a multi-dimensional selection environment; retention occurs in technological regimes conceptualized as rules rather than routines.
“Variation is seen as guided by expectations (Van Lente, 1993), visions and beliefs that provide cognitive substance to search and innovation processes by intentional actors.Selection occurs in a multi-dimensional selection environment, which incorporates not only markets and regulations, but also social, cultural, and political requirements.Retention occurs in technological regimes, which are”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Van Lente, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rip and Kemp, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationCrossovers to structuralism may enrich the MLP with cultural mechanisms that enable scholars to analyze how discursive struggles between niche and regime actors, in the context of changing landscape repertoires, influence the speed and direction of socio-technical transitions.
“These kinds of crossovers to structuralism may enrich the MLP with cultural mechanisms that enable scholars to analyze how discursive struggles between niche and regime actors, in the context of changing (landscape) repertoires, influence the speed and direction of socio-technical transitions (Geels and Verhees, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geels and Verhees, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDiscursive action and legitimacy form mechanisms that link cultural dimensions to politics and economics, and these crossover mechanisms provide interesting extensions of the MLP.
“Discursive action and legitimacy thus form mechanisms that link cultural dimensions to politics and economics.These crossover mechanisms also provide interesting extensions of the MLP (Geels and Verhees, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geels and Verhees, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe interpretive turn in cultural studies argues that meaning arises from interpretation, mobilization and ordering of cultural symbols and cognitive categories; cultural deep structures become toolkits or repertoires actors use to make sense.
“The 'interpretive turn' in cultural studies argues that meaning arises from interpretation, a process in which actors actively draw upon cultural deep structures.Meaning arises from the mobilization and ordering of cultural symbols and cognitive categories.Cultural deep structures thus become 'toolkits' or 'repertoires' that actors use to make sense (Swidler, 1986).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Swidler, 1986 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe MLP's crossovers to conflict ontology are mostly ad-hoc; because the MLP does not provide detailed explanations of sources and changes of power, it could benefit from richer, multi-faceted views of power and conflict.
“But this is mostly done in an adhoc way.Because the MLP does not provide detailed explanations of the sources and changes of power, it could benefit from richer, multi-faceted views of power and conflict (Smith et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLukes (1974) distinguished three faces of power: formal decision-making, agenda-setting, and influencing preferences of subordinate groups.
“Lukes (1974), for instance, distinguished 'three faces of power', the first being the use of political power and authority in formal decisionmaking arenas.The second relates to the power to place issues on or keep them off the agenda (backroom deals, lobbying, implicit threats).The third is about influencing the preferences of subordinate groups so that they do not feel the urge to place issues on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lukes (1974)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe MLP may benefit from crossovers to social movement theory, which deals with conflicts between established orders and groups aiming to correct perceived injustice; these crossovers may be especially fruitful for transitions towards normative goals such as sustainability.
“The MLP may also benefit from crossovers to social movement theory (SMT), which explicitly deals with conflicts between established orders and groups that aim to correct some perceived injustice.These crossovers may be especially fruitful for transitions towards normative goals (such as 'sustainability').”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInterpretive strategy scholars argue that strategic reorientation tends to be preceded by changes in belief systems and interpretive schemes, which alter perceptions of future viability of existing regimes and chances of niche-innovations.
“Interpretive strategy scholars further argue that strategic reorientation also tends to be preceded by changes in belief systems and interpretive schemes, which alter the perceptions of the future viability of existing regimes and the chances of niche-innovations (Grinyer and McKiernan, 1990;Barr et al., 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Grinyer and McKiernan, 1990
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Barr et al., 1992 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTop-down structuralism has been criticised for reification, a monolithic view of cultural deep structures, and determinism; cultural sociology and discourse analysis developed more dynamic and agency-oriented approaches that conceptualize linkages between symbolic deep structures and framing struggles.
“But this kind of 'top-down' structuralism has been criticised for reification, a monolithic view of cultural deep structures, and determinism.Cultural sociology and discourse analysis therefore developed more dynamic and agency-oriented approaches that conceptualize linkages between symbolic deep structures on the one hand and framing struggles and 'collective meaning making' on the other hand (Sp”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Spillman, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTheory as covering laws explains by drawing on general laws, with methodological emphasis on measurement, variables, and statistical generalization.
“(a) 'theory as covering laws', where explanations derive from drawing on general laws; the methodological emphasis is on measurement, variables, and statistical generalization;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe MLP has been criticized for being functionalist, but this criticism is more via labelling than substantiated argument.
“The MLP has been criticized for being functionalist (Smith et al., 2005;Genus and Coles, 2008), although more via labelling than substantiated argument (see also footnote 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Smith et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Genus and Coles, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenSpecific theories and conceptual frameworks may stay within one ontology or work from multi-dimensional and more complex assumptions.
“Specific theories and conceptual frameworks may stay within one ontology, as the previously discussed exemplars, or work from multi-dimensional and more complex assumptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThese approaches suggest possibilities for theoretical extensions of the MLP that address cultural interactions between niche, regime and landscape levels.
“These approaches suggest possibilities for theoretical extensions of the MLP that address cultural interactions between niche, regime and landscape levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningCrossovers addressing co-evolution of firm strategy, perceptions and technological knowledge can enrich the MLP with business-related mechanisms of niche-regime interactions.
“These kinds of crossovers, which address the co-evolution of firm strategy, perceptions and technological knowledge, can enrich the MLP with business-related mechanisms of niche-regime interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenRational choice, functionalism, and relationism are rich ontologies capable of generating alternative frameworks for sustainability transitions.
“Rational choice, functionalism, and relationism are rich ontologies that can generate alternative frameworks on (sustainability) transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMintzberg et al. (1998) distinguish ten different schools in strategic management.
“Mintzberg et al. (1998), for instance, distinguish ten different schools in strategic management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mintzberg et al. (1998)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationShove and Walker advocate a flatter model of multiple relations rather than hierarchical levels, yet they also employ notions of enduring, relatively stable practices and trajectories that refer to stable and predictable structures.
“Although Shove and Walker (this special issue) argue for a 'flatter model characterised by multiple relations (rather than hierarchical levels)', they also use notions such as 'enduring and relatively stable practices' and 'trajectories' (which refer to relatively stable and predictable structures).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shove and Walker (this special issue)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSustainability transitions will be full of debates about relative importance of environmental problems, entailing deep-seated values and beliefs; private actors have no immediate incentive to address sustainability problems; public authorities and civil society will be crucial drivers.
“The former means that sustainability transitions will be full of debates about the relative importance of various environmental problems, which entail deep-seated values and beliefs.The latter means that private actors have no immediate incentive to address sustainability problems.Public authorities and civil society will therefore be crucial drivers for sustainability transitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe MLP frames the topic of transitions in a particular manner and poses specific questions about patterns and mechanisms.
“MLP frames the topic of transitions in a certain way and asks particular questions about patterns and mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFoucault developed accounts of power in which discourse or episteme influences what is considered acceptable.
“Foucault also developed views on power in which discourse (or episteme) exerts influence by defining what is acceptable(Foucault, 1970).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foucault, 1970
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe MLP has been inspired by relationism via Rip and Kemp (1998) who draw on ANT notions such as heterogeneous configuration, co-construction of social and technical elements, and emphasis on ongoing processes, linkages and alignments; some of Geels and Schot's (2007) transition pathways build on these dynamic notions.
“The MLP has been inspired by relationism, e.g.via Rip and Kemp (1998) who draw on actor-network theory (ANT) notions such as heterogeneous configuration, a socio-technical focus where social and technical elements co-construct each other, and an emphasis on ongoing processes, linkages and alignments.Also some of Geels and Schot's (2007) transition pathways (reconfiguration and dealignment/realigm”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rip and Kemp (1998)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Geels and Schot's (2007)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenVarious theories cannot be added up and combined as pieces in a puzzle; one needs to be reflexive about differences in theoretical traditions and underlying assumptions.
“One caveat to this call for opening up innovation studies is that various theories cannot be added up and combined as pieces in a puzzle.One needs to be reflexive about differences in theoretical traditions and underlying assumptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCurrent transport, energy, agri-food and other domains are characterized by multiple green niche-innovations, which deviates from many historical transitions that had one, two or sometimes three niche alternatives; this raises difficult questions of directionality and choice between multiple transition pathways.
“Second, current transport, energy, agri-food and other domains are characterized by multiple 'green' niche-innovations.This variety deviates from many historical transitions that were characterized by one, two or sometimes three niche alternatives.It also raises difficult questions of directionality and choice between multiple transition pathways, especially since these will influence our future”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationANT has notions of networks with varying degrees of stability; Callon et al. (1992) suggests techno-economic networks are more stable if longer, more complete/chained and convergent; this creates opportunities for investigating interactions between stable networks and emerging networks.
“Nevertheless, ANT does have notions of networks with varying degrees of stability.Callon et al. (1992), for instance, suggests that techno-economic networks are more stable if they are longer, more complete/chained and convergent.This view creates opportunities for investigating interactions between stable networks (e.g.existing socio-technical systems) and emerging networks (e.g.niche-innovations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Callon et al. (1992)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenInterpretivist theories have always been part of the MLP, despite the suggestion by Genus and Coles (2008) that SCOT should be incorporated.
“WhereasGenus and Coles's (2008) suggest that SCOT (Social Construction of Technology) should be incorporated in the MLP, interpretivist theories have thus always been part of the MLP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Genus and Coles's (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenA fear of reification results in insufficient attention to broader cognitive, political, and economic structures that could aid in explaining broader patterns.
“This is related to the analytical fear for reification (something that Willem Halfman once called 'reificifobia'), which leads to limited attention for broader structures (cognitive, political, economic) that could be useful for explaining broader patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningANT could be positioned at the MLP's niche-level because its emphasis on innovations in-the-making and focus on what actors do has some fit with fluidity, uncertainty and experimental projects within technological niches, but ANT-scholars might perceive this as pushing their views into an analytical straightjacket, and their view on coordination might sit uncomfortably with the MLP's view on
“One might argue that ANT could be positioned at the MLP's niche-level.ANT's emphasis on innovations 'in-the-making' and the focus on what actors do in practices to make heterogeneous configurations work has some fit with the fluidity, uncertainty and experimental projects within technological niches.But ANT-scholars might perceive such an argument as pushing their views into an analytical straight”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe MLP addresses a specific topic and rests on particular crossovers between evolution theory and interpretivism.
“The MLP is not a grand theory or unifying framework that synthesizes all available theories, but a middle range theory (Geels, 2007) that addresses a specific topic, is based on particular crossovers between evolution theory and interpretivism”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geels, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSMT provides a multi-dimensional view on power struggles where social movements contest existing regimes and support niches.
“SMT thus provides a multi-dimensional view on power struggles where social movements contest existing regimes and support niches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationFor broader, multi-dimensional and complex topics, frameworks or perspectives may be more appropriate than rigorous models.
“In the latter case, frameworks or perspectives may be more relevant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Porter, 1991 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough the MLP is flexible, it cannot and does not intend to incorporate every social theory.
“But while the MLP is a flexible framework, it cannot (and does not want to) incorporate all social theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAssessments of costs, benefits, and negative side-effects of various green pathways entail incompatible criteria and values that differ for various groups.
“Such assessments not only entail incompatible criteria (e.g. the landscape influence of many wind turbines versus risks of nuclear energy), but also values which differ for various groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMany new environmental problems are global, not directly visible or tangible, and mainly about the future; they differ from other environmental problems that were local, immediate, visible and tangible; mobilization is more difficult because cause-effect chains are uncertain, causation diffuse, and sufferers distant in time or space.
“Third, many of the new environmental problems (e.g.climate change, biodiversity, resource depletion) are global, not directly visible or tangible, and are mainly about the future.They therefore differ from other environmental problems (such as water pollution, smog, and acid rain), which were local, (relatively) immediate, visible and tangible.There were clear problem sufferers who could mobilize”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe elements in question remain under-defined and are presented through examples rather than conceptual arguments.
“These elements remain under-defined, however, and are introduced via examples rather than via conceptual arguments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile crossovers to the MLP may be possible, relationism forms an intriguing ontology by itself that can perhaps develop alternative ways of investigating transitions.
“While crossovers to the MLP may be possible, relationism forms an intriguing ontology by itself that can perhaps develop alternative ways of investigating transitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMahoney (2004) identified functionalism, rational choice, power, neo-Darwinian, and cultural ontologies as distinct.
“Mahoney (2004) distinguished functionalism, rational choice, power, neo-Darwinian and cultural ontologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mahoney (2004) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMobilization for new environmental problems will depend to a large extent on social movements and public opinion; this is an additional reason why discourse, socio-political framing and debate are important in sustainability transitions.
“The mobilization for these kinds of problems will therefore depend to a large extent on social movements (often supported by concerned scientists) and public opinion.This is an additional reason why discourse, socio-political framing and debate are important in sustainability transitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenOther combinations and crossovers among social theories can likely produce relevant perspectives.
“Also other permutations and crossovers between social theories can probably generate relevant perspectives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTo address analytical challenges around normativity, directionality, and social mobilization, innovation studies may need to broaden its analytical scope to include additional dynamics related to civil society, social movements and consumer behavior; further crossovers to cultural studies, political economy, economic sociology and consumer studies may be fruitful.
“But to address the analytical challenges around normativity, directionality, and social mobilization, innovation studies may need to broaden its analytical scope to include additional dynamics related to civil society, social movements and consumer behavior.Further crossovers to cultural studies, political economy, economic sociology and consumer studies may therefore be fruitful for a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSocial network theories begin with individual actors who then build networks to advance their interests, unlike relationism.
“This differ from social network theories that start with individual actors who subsequently build networks to further their interests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationRammert's techno-structuration approach is promising because it examines crossovers among constructivism, evolution theory, and structuration theory.
“Rammert's (1997) techno-structuration approach is promising in this respect, because it explores crossovers between constructivism, evolution theory and structuration theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rammert's (1997) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis criticism applies less to other relationist approaches such as practice theories, in particular Shove's work on consumer practices.
“This criticism applies less to other relationist approaches such as practice theories, in particular Shove's work on consumer practices that analyses how existing routines, meanings and technologies influence activities in 'everyday life'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena.
“Because socio-technical transitions are multi-dimensional phenomena, they can be studied from various angles by different disciplines.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The four meta-theoretical positions (complete integration, incommensurability, eclecticism, inter-ontology crossovers) exhaust the possible relations between ontologies.
“Regarding this issue, I distinguish four meta-theoretical positions: (1) Complete integration: theories combine all (or many) ontologies into an encompassing synthesis, (2) Incommensurability: theories should work within one ontology; combination is not possible, because foundational assumptions differ too much (cannot be 'measured' in the same units), (3) Eclecticism: theories pragmatically”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ontologies discussed are representative of the generic social science traditions relevant to socio-technical transitions.
“The previous sections demonstrated the breath of generic social science traditions and how their insights can be related to sociotechnical transitions and sustainability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The multi-level perspective is a valuable and coherent framework for analyzing socio-technical transitions, such that it is worth clarifying its theoretical roots and extending it.
“Although the multi-dimensionality of niche-regime-landscape interactions is a strength of the MLP, this is conceptualized in a general and heuristic sense.The MLP could therefore benefit from conceptual extensions of multi-level interaction on various dimensions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sustainability transitions are a desirable and important goal, so that understanding and accelerating them is a worthwhile research aim.
“Such a broad map is particularly relevant for future sustainability transitions, which have three additional complexities compared to many historical transitions.First, sustainability is a normative goal and a collective good problem (with associated prisoner dilemmas and free rider problems).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is hard to accommodate the complicated and interdependent relationships between different structural elements of 'whole systems', or to track the pathways through which different macro-level actors and processes shape implementation contexts at meso- and micro-level.
“Even so, it is hard to accommodate the complicated and interdependent relationships between different structural elements of ‘whole systems’, or to track the pathways through which different macro-level actors and processes shape implementation contexts at meso- and micro-level [39–41].”
From Implementation, context and complexity (2016) · cites this paper as [41]
At the heart of these transitions is the establishment and socio-technical (re)design of higher education frameworks resulting in new forms of knowledge production, allowing for the design and redesign of human-centered socio-technical systems for sustainability, and consequently for human benefit.
“At the heart of these transitions is the establishment and socio-technical (re)design of higher education frameworks resulting in new forms of knowledge production, allowing for the design and redesign of human-centered socio-technical systems for sustainability, and consequently for human benefit (Geels, 2010;Verbong & Geels, 2010).”
From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Geels, 2010
Cites
(1983) · Cited by 33,192 · see citing works
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J. A., & Backhaus, U. (2003) · The European heritage in economics and the social sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,631 · see citing works
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,401 · see citing works
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B. N., & Schön, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,311 · see citing works
(1984) · Cited by 21,166 · see citing works
Increasing returns and long-run growth
Romer, P. M. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261420 · Cited by 20,149 · see citing works
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903 · see citing works
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
Stewart, C. J. (1984) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/0738-3991(84)90022-3 · Cited by 19,751 · see citing works
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592 · see citing works
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462 · see citing works
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393344 · Cited by 11,926 · see citing works
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735 · see citing works
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953 · see citing works
(1951) · Cited by 8,693 · see citing works
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661 · see citing works
The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.
Moore, F. C. T., & Foucault, M. (1971) · Man · doi:10.2307/2799252 · Cited by 8,097 · see citing works
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,037 · see citing works
(1934) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 7,609 · see citing works
Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226464 · Cited by 7,381 · see citing works
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275 · see citing works
Self-citationTechnological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685 · see citing works
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654 · see citing works
A Behavioral Theory of the FirmPreprint
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 6,490 · see citing works
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2020) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780804788090 · Cited by 5,768 · see citing works
Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis.
Louis, M. R., Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392394 · Cited by 5,616 · see citing works
Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing
Reckwitz, A. (2002) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/13684310222225432 · Cited by 5,544 · see citing works
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnsen, E. (1964) · Ledelse & erhvervsøkonomi · Cited by 4,996 · see citing works
Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165852 · Cited by 4,959 · see citing works
The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge
Gustafson, J. M., Berger, P. L., Luckmann, T., & Luckmann, T. (1968) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1385127 · Cited by 4,311 · see citing works
The Politics of Environmental Discourse
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,197 · see citing works
Latour, B. (1987) · Cited by 4,106 · see citing works
From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems
Geels, F. W. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 · Cited by 4,098 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems
Holling, C. S. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5 · Cited by 4,087 · see citing works
Technical Change and Economic Theory.
Swann, G. M. P., & Giovanni Dosi, A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234048 · Cited by 4,061 · see citing works
Towards a dynamic theory of strategy
Porter, M. E. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250121008 · Cited by 3,950 · see citing works
Manifesto for a Relational Sociology
Emirbayer, M. (1997) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231209 · Cited by 3,832 · see citing works
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
Christensen, C. M. (2013) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 3,708 · see citing works
Unruh, G. C. (2000) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00070-7 · Cited by 3,304 · see citing works
Actor Network Theory and After
Stark, D. E., Law, J., & Hassard, J. S. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2654376 · Cited by 3,256 · see citing works
Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9704071862 · Cited by 3,227 · see citing works
Institutions and Organizations.
Marsden, P. V., & Scott, W. R. (1996) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580775 · Cited by 3,079 · see citing works
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
Baumöl, W. J., Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1964) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150326 · Cited by 3,009 · see citing works
Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century.
Tomich, D., & Braverman, H. (1976) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063071 · Cited by 2,998 · see citing works
Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process
Rosenberg, H. R., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1940) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1839798 · Cited by 2,972 · see citing works
At home in the universe: the search for laws of self-organization and complexity
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3294 · Cited by 2,862 · see citing works
Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies
Kitschelt, H. P. (1986) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712340000380x · Cited by 2,563 · see citing works
Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity
Malina, R. F., & Holland, J. H. (1996) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1576256 · Cited by 2,507 · see citing works
Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process
Zingler, E. K., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1940) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1053493 · Cited by 2,411 · see citing works
Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources
Lounsbury, M. D., & Glynn, M. A. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.188 · Cited by 2,341 · see citing works
The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 · Cited by 2,238 · see citing works
The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-1513 · Cited by 2,233 · see citing works
More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001) · Foresight · doi:10.1108/14636680110803003 · Cited by 2,100 · see citing works
Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search
Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666981 · Cited by 2,032 · see citing works
Aramis, or, The Love of Technology.
Lyman, P. T., Latour, B., & Porter, C. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076625 · Cited by 1,997 · see citing works
Science as Practice and Culture
Pickering, A. (1992) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226668208.001.0001 · Cited by 1,907 · see citing works
Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories
Poole, M. S., & van de Ven, A. H. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308389 · Cited by 1,905 · see citing works
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393788 · Cited by 1,883 · see citing works
(1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663901 · Cited by 1,774 · see citing works
The antecedents of deinstitutionalization
Oliver, C. (1992) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069201300403 · Cited by 1,746 · see citing works
Strategy safari: a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3419 · Cited by 1,739 · see citing works
The liability of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates
Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094928 · Cited by 1,700 · see citing works
Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310758 · Cited by 1,426 · see citing works
Science as practice and culture
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-2045 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Mote, J. E., & Callon, M. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2655250 · Cited by 1,390 · see citing works
Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (1998) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379803500406 · Cited by 1,366 · see citing works
System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability
Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781845423421 · Cited by 1,292 · see citing works
Self-citationCognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131004 · Cited by 1,290 · see citing works
After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology
Law, J. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1999.tb03479.x · Cited by 1,283 · see citing works
(2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58292-0_191197 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004 · Cited by 1,268 · see citing works
Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience : The Social Organization of Normality
(2003) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781474214605 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works
Single-Loop and Double-Loop Models in Research on Decision Making
Argyris, C. (1976) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391848 · Cited by 1,226 · see citing works
Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity
Fukuyama, F., & Holland, J. H. (1996) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20047667 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation
Rothaermel, F. T. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.180 · Cited by 1,114 · see citing works
At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity
Malina, R. F., & Kauffman, S. A. (1996) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1576330 · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage
Otto, E. R., & Foster, R. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258527 · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management
Shove, E., & Walker, G. P. (2007) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a39310 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Elias, N. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 981 · see citing works
(1998) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Consumers, Producers and Practices
Shove, E., & Pantzar, M. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540505049846 · Cited by 906 · see citing works
Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through The Wilds of Strategic Management
Panda, S. S. (1999) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ws.1999.07948bae.002 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach
Rehin, G. F., Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. J. (1993) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591836 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Social movements: a cognitive approach
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1205 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms
Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553247 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1998) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199804)19:4 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Human Choice and Climate Change
Cooper, R. N., Raynor, S., & Malone, E. L. (1998) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20049143 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Rosenkopf, L., & Tushman, M. L. (1992) · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (1998) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152166 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions
Genus, A., & Coles, A. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
An Organizational Learning Model of Convergence and Reorientation
Lant, T. K., & Mezias, S. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.47 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science.
Billings, D. B., & Collins, R. (1976) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2576244 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Sabine, G. H., Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1947) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2182065 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Jay, M. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520915381-004 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Comments on “What theory is not”
DiMaggio, P. J. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393790 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change
LEVINTHAL, D. A. (1998) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/7.2.217 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
The Governance of Sustainable Development: Taking Stock and Looking Forwards
Jordan, A. (2008) · Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/cav6 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
As Time Goes by: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution
Hatch, N. W., Mackey, T. B., Freeman, C., & Louçã, F. (2002) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134358 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
(2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_302219 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Horgan, J. (1995) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0695-104 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process.
Morgenstern, O., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1940) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2278731 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Williams, C., & Collins, R. (1995) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1319231 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Morel, B., & Ramanujam, R. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.278 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-007-0057-5 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Self-citationSociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science
Ritzer, G. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446220160.n4 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Don't throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1992) · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Paradox, Spirals, Ambivalence: the New Language of Change and Pluralism
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707694 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory.
Rule, J. B., Hedstrom, P., & Swedberg, R. (1999) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/3005930 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Collins, R. (1994) · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Sociological theory: what went wrong?: diagnosis and remedies
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-6613 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Innovation and the evolution of industries
Malerba, F. (2005) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-005-0005-1 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Cattani, G. (2006) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtj016 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums?
Collins, R. (1986) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228424 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
The state and technical innovation: a case-study of the electrical vehicle in France
Callon, M. (1980) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(80)90032-3 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Seeds of transition: essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture.
Wiskerke, J. S. C., & van der Ploeg, J. D. (2004) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state
Meadowcroft, J. (2005) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563460500344419 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Environmental Policy and Technical Change
Kemp, R. (1997) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781035383887 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Callon, M., Larédo, P., Rabeharisoa, V., Gonard, T., & Leray, T. (1992) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(92)90017-x · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Hess, D. J. (2005) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243905276499 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Technology, politics and the market: an interview with Michel Callon
Barry, A., & Slater, D. (2002) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085140220123171 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Surviving Schumpeterian environments: an evolutionary perspective
LEVINTHAL, D. (1992) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/1.3.427 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Geels, F. W. (2007) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907303597 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding industrial transformation: Views from different disciplines
Olsthoorn, A. A., & Wieczorek, A. J. (2006) · VU Research Portal · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Technological change and company strategies : economic and sociological perspectives
Coombs, R., Saviotti, P., & Walsh, V. (1992) · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Environmental Policy and Technical Change
Boehmer-Christiansen, S. A. (1997) · Energy & Environment · doi:10.1177/0958305x9700800408 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Geels, F. W. (2006) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.09.006 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: A reflexive overview
Morlacchi, P., & Martin, B. R. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.021 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
The strategic use of innovation to influence regulatory standards
Puller, S. L. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.07.002 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Halkier, B. (1999) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-7200(199905)1:1 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Revisiting general theory in historical sociology
Mahoney, J. (2004) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0018 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Beyond Harmony and Consensus: A Social Conflict Approach to Technology
Hård, M. (1993) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399301800402 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
New technology in everyday life: social processes and environmental impact
Røpke, I. (2001) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00183-5 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Smith, A. (2005) · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Collins, H. M., & Yearley, S. (1992) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“Doing” Reflexive Modernization in Pig Husbandry
Bos, A. P., & Grin, J. (2008) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907306697 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Oceans Apart? Business Responses to Global Environmental Issues in Europe and the United States
Levy, D. L., & Newell, P. J. (2000) · Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1080/00139150009605761 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Deliberate futures: precaution and progress in social choice of sustainable technology
Stirling, A. (2007) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.347 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Technology as Practice: Local and Global Closure Processes in Diesel-Engine Design
Hård, M. (1994) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631279402400304 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science.
Green, D. S., & Ritzer, G. (1981) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066575 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
New rules of sociological method: rethinking technology studies
Rammert, W. (1997) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591747 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Bergh, V. D. J. C. J. M., & Bruinsma, F. R. (2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Geels, F. W. (2009) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320903182280 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationIs sociological theory too grand for social mechanisms?
van den Berg, A. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663901.009 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Beneath the surface : critical essays in the philosophy of deep ecology
Katz, E., Light, A., & Rothenberg, D. J. (2000) · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Rip, A. (1992) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The Policy relevance of the Quasi-evolutionary Model. The Case of Stimulating Clean Technologies
Schot, J. (1992) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Alexander, J. C., & Colomy, P. (1985) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.2307/202221 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Food for All in the 21st Century
Conway, G. (2000) · Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1080/00139150009604857 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnoses and Remedies.
Rule, J. B., & Mouzelis, N. P. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076821 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Letters from Prison, by Antonio Gramsci, edited and translated by Lynne Lawner
Young, J. A. (1974) · Journal of History · doi:10.3138/cjh.9.3.352 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A Neo-Classical Economic View on Technological Transitions
Butter, F. A. G. D., & Hofkes, M. W. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4418-6_8 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
EES and the continuing evolution of Research Policy
Martin, B. R., Bell, M., Callon, M., Grupp, H., Kodama, F., Kuhlmann, S., Fleming, L., von Tunzelmann, N., & Powell, W. W. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Multidimensional problems: a critique of Jeffrey Alexander's theoretical logic in sociology
Burger, T. (1986) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1986.tb00261.x · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Gramsci, A., 1932 (1975). In: Lynne Lawner (Ed.). Letters from Prison, Antonio Gramsci, Harper Colophon, New York.
- Grinyer, 1990, Generating major change in stagnating companies, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 131
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
Markard, J., Raven, R. P. J. M., & Truffer, B. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · Cited by 3,861 · see citing works
The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms
Geels, F. W. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · Cited by 3,092 · see citing works
Self-citationAn agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800 · see citing works
“On the other hand, transitions research typically breaks with the ”reificophobicß STS inclination towards deconstruction and meticulous description, reaching for more generic insights, middle-range theory and explanation (Geels, 2007, 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWhat is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · Cited by 1,712 · see citing works
Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions
Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2015) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Implementation, context and complexity
May, C. R., Johnson, M., & Finch, T. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0506-3 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
“Even so, it is hard to accommodate the complicated and interdependent relationships between different structural elements of ‘whole systems’, or to track the pathways through which different macro-level actors and processes shape implementation contexts at meso- and micro-level [39–41].”
BackgroundAchieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2017) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-05-2017-2929 · Cited by 1,029 · see citing works
“Moreover, it is likely that careful exploration and engagement with science and technology studies ( for an introduction, see Geels (2010)) and resilience ( for an introduction, seeWalker et al. (2004)) literature will yield potentially useful framing devices for SDG-related accounting studies.”
BackgroundSeyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012) · Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/c10222 · Cited by 1,017 · see citing works
“…a literature on sustainability transitions has emerged which posits a multilevel perspective (MLP) to capture the dialectical relationships between microlevel actors and macrolevel structures (Geels, 2005a; 2010; Loorbach, 2007; Rip and Kemp, 1998; Rotmans et al, 2001; Smith et al, 2005; 2010).”
BackgroundWezel, A., Herren, B. G., Kerr, R. B., Barrios, E., Gonçalves, A. L. R., & Sinclair, F. (2020) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-020-00646-z · Cited by 926 · see citing works
“Some transitions begin at a small scale, a ‘niche’ or protected space in which farmer cooperatives, social movements, businesses, local government or other groups experiment with and adapt alternative ways of doing things (Geels 2010; Hinrichs 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory
Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change
Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W., Azevedo, I., de Bruin, W. B., Dalkmann, H., Edelenbosch, O., Geels, F., Grubler, A., Hepburn, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Self-citationJust transition: A conceptual review
Wang, X., & Lo, K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., Andreini, D., Abumoghli, I., Barlette, Y., Bunker, D., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456 · Cited by 761 · see citing works
“…the establishment and socio-technical (re)design of higher education frameworks resulting in new forms of knowledge production, allowing for the design and redesign of human-centered socio-technical systems for sustainability, and consequently for human benefit (Geels, 2010; Verbong & Geels, 2010).”
BackgroundOlsson, L., Jerneck, A., Thorén, H., Persson, J., & O’Byrne, D. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400217 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
“Rather than seeing resilience as a grand or unifying theory, it should be seen (and used) as a middle-range theory compatible with some, but not all, ontologies (91).”
BackgroundInfluentialSocio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions
Lawhon, M., & Murphy, J. T. (2011) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132511427960 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
“Geels (2006, 2010) is perhaps a unique excep- tion, providing insight into the role of social activism in creating pressure to change sewage systems in the Netherlands (2006) and urging a theorization of the role of social movement leaders in shaping transitions (2010).”
BackgroundLotz‐Sisitka, H., Wals, A. E. J., Kronlid, D. O., & McGarry, D. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
“can be driven/emerge [63].”
Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., Kemp, R., Jørgensen, M. S., Bauler, T., Ruijsink, S., et al. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
“Keeping in mind that the MLP needs to be adapted to the particular empirical phenomenon under study (Geels, 2010), the discussions of our shades of change and innovation will also indicate such adaptations where relevant.”
BackgroundEnvironmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies
Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2012) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.646164 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
“…on insights from environmental innovation research but adopts a systemic perspective by considering the interplay of a whole range of potentially relevant actors (including governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), research institutes, etc.), as well as different forms of institutions…”
BackgroundDesigning agroecological transitions; A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research
Irwin, T. (2015) · Design and Culture · doi:10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
“…momentum until the wider technological regime is transformed by the concepts and configurations nurtured in the niche (Berkhout et al. 2003: 1; Geels 2010; Pettersen et al. 2013); (f) Metamorphosis and theories of wholeness and holism (also “applied phenomenology”) focus on the transformation…”
BackgroundOrdering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change
Sovacool, B. K., & Hess, D. J. (2017) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717709363 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
“A wide range of distinctions is evident in some of the most proximate literature, such as grand versus middle-range theories (Merton, 1948, 1967), models versus frameworks (Geels, 2010), and meta-theories and theory frames (Rueschemeyer, 2009).”
The politics of sustainability transitions
Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., & Jhagroe, S. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2016.1216782 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
“By conceptualising relational, dispositional and structural power (Hoffman & Loeber (2015) – cf.”
BackgroundIs the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation
O’Brien, K. L. (2018) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.010 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
“Geels FW, Berkhout F, van Vuuren DP: Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions.”
BackgroundInfluentialFischer, L.-B., & Newig, J. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8050476 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions
Geels, F. W., Berkhout, F., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2980 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
“There are other ontologies such as interpretivism, struc-turalism, and conflict theories, which highlight different dimensions of social realities and low-carbon transitions.”
Self-citationAvelino, F. (2017) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1777 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108284646 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system
Watson, M. (2012) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.002 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
“While for some commentators there are ontological tensions between theories of practice and approaches to socio-technical transition like the Multi-Level Perspective (Geels, 2010), here I initially take a”
BackgroundInfluentialGeels, F. W. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119894 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Self-citationEcho chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion
Törnberg, P. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203958 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
“This suggests a theoretical connection to the “innovation niches” of socio-technical transitions, which are argued to act as “safe havens” in which new technologies can develop, free from market pressures, before spreading to the general market (see e.g. [61]).”
BackgroundLüdeke‐Freund, F. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2396 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Jenkins, K. E. H., Sovacool, B. K., & McCauley, D. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
“According to Geels (2010), these levels refer to heterogeneous configurations of increasing stability.”
BackgroundSociotechnical agendas: Reviewing future directions for energy and climate research
Sovacool, B. K., Hess, D. J., Amir, S., Geels, F. W., Hirsh, R. F., Medina, L. R., Miller, C. A., Palavicino, C. A., Phadke, R., Ryghaug, M., et al. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Self-citationThe politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments
Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. J. (2018) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9314-8 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
“…the need to uncover mechanisms that mutually link or assimilate the local to the global—how actions and outcomes in specific places can catalyze broader transformation (or stymie it)—to account for change and to show how changes at different scales implicate changes more broadly (Geels 2010).”
BackgroundBinz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2015) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
“Over the last 20 years they integrated sociological and canonical understandings of path dependency in an elaborate research agenda that tries to understand the determinants of structural change in socio-technical systems (Geels 2010; Markard, et al. 2012).”
BackgroundThe geopolitics of energy system transformation: A review
Blondeel, M., Bradshaw, M., Bridge, G., & Kuzemko, C. (2021) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12580 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
“Nonetheless, despite recent interest in power, politics and incumbency, STT research remains primarily concerned with innovation (Geels, 2010, 2014; Johnstone & Newell, 2018; Sovacool, Hess, et al., 2020; Turnheim & Geels, 2012, 2013).”
BackgroundKeeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies
Smink, M., Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1808 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
“As a consequence, these regime actors are expected to engage in strategic behavior to safeguard their interests (Meadowcroft, 2009; Geels, 2010; Walker and Shove, 2007).”
BackgroundA multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation
Walrave, B., Talmar, M., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Romme, A. G. L., & Verbong, G. P. J. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
“In addition to resource constraints, the focal venture and other ecosystem actors also have a tendency towards satisficing (Geels, 2010; Simon, 1956) and due to the limited number of options considered in their own local search, sub-optimal versions of the EVP and EM are likely to be chosen.”
BackgroundSocio-technical transitions and policy change – Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy
Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. M. (2015) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
“The MLP highlights technology variation and selection as core explanatory principles (Geels, 2010).”
BackgroundScientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: A critical review
Schwanen, T., Banister, D., & Anable, J. (2011) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.005 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
“The former group is predicated on thinking from evolutionary theory and interpretative sociology (Geels, 2010).”
BackgroundMobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation – A systematic review of barriers and solutions
Polzin, F. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.007 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
“Policy makers do not implement adaptive policy portfolios to keep options open and deal with uncertainty [150,169,172].”
Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions
Pel, B., Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Bauler, T., Kunze, I., Dorland, J., Wittmayer, J., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104080 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency
Kuzemko, C., Lockwood, M., Mitchell, C., & Hoggett, R. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.022 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Transitions to sustainability: a change in thinking about food systems change?
Hinrichs, C. C. (2014) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9479-5 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
“According to the MLP, sustainability transitions occur through an evolutionary process of regime shift that emerges dynamically from interactions and change across several heuristically distinguished levels (Geels 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialAvelino, F. (2021) · Journal of Political Power · doi:10.1080/2158379x.2021.1875307 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development
Jørgensen, U. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Heavy rare earths, permanent magnets, and renewable energies: An imminent crisis
Stegen, K. S. (2015) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.015 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
“Innovation, which is clearly needed to catch up to China, is fostered by supporting ‘niche-level’ activities (Geels, 2010) such as research and development, laboratories and information exchange.”
BackgroundBilali, H. E. (2019) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture9040074 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Jorgenson, S., Stephens, J. C., & White, B. (2019) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.2019.1604478 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
“…university of vermont, 534c Waterman, Burlington, vT 05405, uSa color versions of one or more of the figures in this article can be found online at www.tandfonline.com/vjee complexity that fundamental and transformative changes to society’s energy systems are required (Geels, 2010; IPCC, 2018).”
BackgroundMetatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational
Garud, R. B., & Gehman, J. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
A review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models
Li, F. G. N., Trutnevyte, E., & Strachan, N. D. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.017 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
“In the energy field, the MLP has been applied to transitions in energy (especially electricity) supply (Rosenbloom and Meadowcroft, 2014; Verbong and Geels, 2007, 2010; Yuan et al., 2012), transport (Marletto, 2014; McDowall, 2014), and the residential buildings sector (Horne et al., 2014; ONeill…”
BackgroundMethodA perspective on radical transformations to sustainability: resistances, movements and alternatives
Temper, L., Walter, M., Rodríguez, I., Kothari, A., & Turhan, E. (2018) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0543-8 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
“Socio-political struggles that confront hegemonic and incumbent power including corporate state alliances on fossil fuels, mining and other polluting industries are a key factor in regime destabilization (Geels 2010) which then open the door for the alternatives that movements are cultivating to emerge.”
Transformative innovation policy: A systematic review
Haddad, C. R., Nakić, V., Bergek, A., & Hellsmark, H. (2022) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.03.002 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Rosenbloom, D., Berton, H., & Meadowcroft, J. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.012 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Socio-energy systems design: A policy framework for energy transitions
Miller, C. A., Richter, J., & O’Leary, J. (2014) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.004 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Global socio-technical regimes
Fuenfschilling, L., & Binz, C. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.003 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
“The regime denotes the ‘deep-structure’ or ‘grammar’ of a socio-technical system, defining appropriate, legitimate and conceivable means-end rationalities in a given sector (Geels, 2010).”
BackgroundPluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity
Stirling, A. (2011) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.005 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Kanger, L., Sovacool, B. K., & Noorkõiv, M. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104072 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
“1 Stimulate different niches The MLP identifies itself as a cross-over between sociological approaches and evolutionary economics (Geels and Schot, 2007; Geels, 2010), encompassing not only social learning, collective interpretation and power struggles, but also the processes of variation, selection and retention.”
BackgroundEcological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability: an overview and conceptual framework
Scheidel, A., Temper, L., Demaria, F., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2017) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0519-0 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
“…scholarship on transitions, rooted in innovation and Science and Technology Studies, primarily aims to understand historical technological change and how the development of specific technologies and institutional frameworks lead to the reconfiguration of socio-technical relationships (Geels 2010).”
BackgroundMatin, N., Forrester, J. M., & Ensor, J. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.020 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
“In taking this approach, our aim is to develop a ‘‘middle-range theory” of equitable resilience (Geels, 2010).”
MethodTrasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions
Newell, P. J. (2018) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2018.1511448 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
“The need to understand the ways in which pressures from above and below can ‘lead to cracks, tensions and windows of opportunity’ (Geels, 2010: 495) opens up space for insights from IPE about who the agents are in this process and how the forms of power that they exercise are able to bring about…”
BackgroundBidmon, C. M., & Knab, S. F. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Satalkina, L., & Steiner, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072764 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Moving beyond disruptive innovation: A review of disruption in sustainability transitions
Kivimaa, P., Laakso, S., Lonkila, A., & Kaljonen, M. (2020) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.12.001 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
“Following Geels (2010) definition, transitions involve also changing practices and cultural meanings.”
BackgroundChallenges for Social-Ecological Transformations: Contributions from Social and Political Ecology
Görg, C., Brand, U., Haberl, H., Hummel, D., Jähn, T., & Liehr, S. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9071045 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
“The “transition management” approach [27,28] asks for the processes how social innovations in niches are upscaled to regimes and landscapes.”
BackgroundAgroecological research: Conforming—Or transforming the dominant agro-food regime
Levidow, L., Pimbert, M., & Vanloqueren, G. (2014) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2014.951459 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“The multilevel perspective (MLP) explains transitions within three interacting levels, namely: “niches (the locus for radical innovations), socio-technical regimes, which are locked in and stabilized on several dimensions, and an exogenous socio-technical landscape” (Geels 2010: 495).”
BackgroundHermwille, L. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
“…model of transitions that captures the overall process” (Geels & Schot, 2010, p. 29), it is Giddens’ Structuration Theory that, as an underlying model provides a multi-dimensional understanding of structure and agency within a socio-technical regime (Geels & Kemp, 2011, p. 42; Geels, 2010b, 2014).”
BackgroundPathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions
Rosenbloom, D. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.011 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Iñigo, E. A., Albareda, L., & Ritala, P. (2017) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2017.1310034 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
“This process affects not only the firm and its network but also its surrounding environment and how the company transforms societal and environmental issues by adopting the socio-technical transitions towards sustainable development (Geels 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialKern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2017) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.11.001 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Community energy storage: A responsible innovation towards a sustainable energy system?
Koirala, B. P., van Oost, E., & van der Windt, H. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.163 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Up, Down, round and round: Connecting Regimes and Practices in Innovation for Sustainability
Hargreaves, T., Longhurst, N., & Seyfang, G. (2013) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a45124 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“There remains “no unifi ed practice approach” (Schatzki, 2001, page 2) and indeed many variants of practice theory have previously been expressed (for example, by Bourdieu, 1977; Giddens, 1984; Reckwitz, 2002; Schatzki, 2002); however, in this paper we adopt an approach developed by Shove and Pantzar (Pantzar and Shov…”
MethodInfluentialBrand, U. (2016) · Environmental Values · doi:10.3197/096327116x14703858759017 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“The multi-level perspective focuses on niches (Geels, 2010); the transition management school looks for a ‘novel mode of governance for sustainable development’ and respective alliances (Loorbach and Rotmans, 2010; Frantzeskaki et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialRauschmayer, F., Bauler, T., & Schäpke, N. A. (2014) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.018 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Lifestyle practices and pro-environmental technology
Axsen, J., TyreeHageman, J., & Lentz, A. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.013 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
“Individual practices also reflexively relate to social institutions and technological regimes (Geels, 2010; Geels and Schot, 2007; Giddens, 1984), but we leave these additional “macro” considerations to future extensions of this research.”
BackgroundA survey and review of approaches to study transitions
Lachman, D. A. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Ehnert, F., Kern, F., Borgström, S. T., Gorissen, L., Maschmeyer, S., & Egermann, M. (2017) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.002 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
People in transitions: Energy citizenship, prosumerism and social movements in Europe
Campos, I. S., & Marín‐González, E. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101718 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Heading towards a multimodal city of the future?
Spickermann, A., Grienitz, V., & von der Gracht, H. A. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.036 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Wolfram, M., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8020144 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
“[128].”
Social tipping processes towards climate action: A conceptual framework
Winkelmann, R., Donges, J. F., Smith, E. K., Milkoreit, M., Eder, C., Heitzig, J., Κατσανίδου, Α., Wiedermann, M., Wunderling, N., & Lenton, T. M. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107242 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
“n on complexity above). Note that social tipping as defined here is a unique form of social change, e.g., distinct from climate economic shocks (15) and more specific than socio-technical transitions (96, 97). Further, social tipping also denotes a shift to a qualitatively different state, and such, is different from…”
BackgroundNetworks, ecosystems, fields, market systems? Making sense of the business environment
Möller, K., Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.013 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
“Similar approaches depicting the operating environment of businesses as nested and layered have been presented, for example, within the service-dominant logic (Chandler & Vargo, 2011; Vargo & Lusch, 2016, 2017) and the multilevel perspective of socio-technical regimes (Geels, 2002, 2005, 2010).”
(Un)making in sustainability transformation beyond capitalism
Feola, G., Vincent, O., & Moore, D. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102290 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“, 2018) and lamented the inability of existing research and research frameworks to integrate different ontologies about the nature of social and socioecological change (e.g. Sunderlin, 1995; Geels, 2010).”
BackgroundGrassroots Innovation Movements
Smith, A., Fressoli, M., Abrol, D. K., Arond, E., & Ely, A. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315697888 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Hossain, M. R., Rao, A., Sharma, G. D., Dev, D., & Kharbanda, A. (2024) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107736 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Giudice, M. D., Khan, Z., Silva, M. D., Scuotto, V., Caputo, F., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2237 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Ghosh, B., Kivimaa, P., Ramírez, M., Schot, J., & Torrens, J. C. L. (2020) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scab045 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Transformation of Infrastructures: Sector Characteristics and Implications for Fundamental Change
Markard, J. (2011) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000056 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Four dangers in innovation policy studies – and how to avoid them
Flanagan, K., & Uyarra, E. (2016) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
“…to us that some of the recent work on sectoral innovation policies in areas such as energy, and on transitions in socio-technical systems (see e.g. Geels 2010, 2014) does demonstrate how insights from innovation studies can be applied in a more critical, analytical and interdisciplinary manner…”
BackgroundSchmidt, T. S., Schneider, M., Rogge, K. S., Schuetz, M. J. A., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2012) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.12.002 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“Only recently have scholars started to include cognitive organisational theories which try to explain firms’ strategy making into evolutionary innovation studies (Geels, 2010; Kaplan and Tripsas, 2008; Nooteboom, 2009).”
BackgroundEconomic relations between Germany and southern Europe
Simonazzi, A., Ginzburg, A., & Nocella, G. (2013) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bet010 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Gorissen, L., Spira, F., Meynaerts, E., Valkering, P., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.052 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“Investigating acceleration dynamics of urban roduction (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.052 systems (e.g. Geels, 2010), transition phases with clear beginnings and endings (e.g. Rotmans et al., 2001), and distinct roles of for instance incumbents versus new entrants (Smink,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSavaget, P., Geissdoerfer, M., Kharrazi, A., & Evans, S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.208 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
“Agents are capable of interpreting, applying and negotiating rules they do not fully control (Geels, 2010).”
BackgroundSustainability transitions and final consumption: practices and socio-technical systems
McMeekin, A., & Southerton, D. (2012) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.663960 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“@The MLP distinguishes three analytical levels: niches (the locus for radical innovation), socio-technical regimes, which are locked in and stabilized on several dimensions, and an exogenous socio-technical landscape.”
BackgroundInfluentialDiving into emerging economies bottleneck: Industry 4.0 and implications for circular economy
Cezarino, L. O., Liboni, L. B., Stefanelli, N. O., de Oliveira, B. G., & Stocco, L. C. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2018-1084 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Cha, J. M. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101657 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Assessing nature-based solutions for transformative change
Palomo, I., Locatelli, B., Otero, I., Colloff, M. J., Crouzat, É., Cuní‐Sanchez, A., Gómez‐Baggethun, E., González‐García, A., Grêt‐Regamey, A., Jiménez-Aceituno, A., et al. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.013 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
System innovation for sustainability: a systemic double-flow scenario method for companies
Gaziulusoy, İ., Boyle, C., & McDowall, R. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.013 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Provisioning systems for a good life within planetary boundaries
Fanning, A. L., O'Neill, D. W., & Büchs, M. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102135 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
“The existing literature provides useful discussions and integrations of different theories to better understand sustainability transitions (Cherp et al., 2018; Fisher et al., 2013; Geels, 2010; Geels et al., 2015; Sovacool and Hess, 2017; Turnheim et al., 2015).”
The roles of users in electric, shared and automated mobility transitions
Axsen, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.012 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“These latter frameworks are consistent with literature on “socio-technical transitions”, which explores the interactions between technical and social systems when new technologies emerge (Geels, 2010).”
Result
- Authors
- Geels, F. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Geels, Frank W.
- ORCID
- Geels, Frank W.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 495-510
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134317867
- Cited by
- 1,718
- References
- 162
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 197 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 158 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 41.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
- Keywords
- multi-level perspective, socio-technical transitions, reflexivity, transition theory, rational choice theory, evolutionary theory, structuralism, interpretivism, functionalism, relationalism, agency, causal mechanisms, environmental sustainability, middle-range theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review