Cited by 3Ethics and Social Impacts of AICybernetics and Technology in SocietyMilitary Strategy and Technology

Targets in the Cloud: On Transparency and Other Shadows

Caduff, Carlo·2017·Science, Technology, & Human Values

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0162243916687644

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The information produced in the interest of transparency can occlude as much as it reveals, and in the process add to anxiety already felt in response to being subjected to automated decision-making.

    “The information produced in the interest of transparency can occlude as much as it reveals, and in the process add to anxiety already felt in response to being subjected to automated decision-making (Ananny and Crawford 2018;Caduff 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caduff, C.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Caduff, Carlo
Venue
Science, Technology, & Human Values
Published
2017-01-18
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
315-319
ISSN
  • 0162-2439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8251
OpenAlex
W2577454435
Cited by
3
References
9
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science Technology & Human Values (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
Keywords
cloud computing, research data management, data storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review