The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies
Open accessAbstract
A synthesis of neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary, sociological, and historical coevolution ary models could be used for constructive technology assessment, aimed at the active management of the process of technological change. This article proposes a synthetic quasi-evolutionary model, in which variation and selection are neither independent nor coincidental processes. Variation and selection are linked by actors, resulting in the actor role labeled technological nexus. On the basis of the quasi-evolutionary approach, three constructive technology assessment strategies are proposed: stimulating alternative variations, changing the selection environment, and creating or utilizing technological nexus. The usefulness of these concepts is demonstrated for the case of clean technolo gies. Ultimately, a conscious application of these strategies could result in a new actor role for government as a creative social regulator of technological change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Boundary spanning roles and organization structure
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257905 · Cited by 1,518
Cited by
The social shaping of technology
Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2 · Cited by 917
Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation
Verbeek, P.-P. (2006) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243905285847 · Cited by 683
Sustainable Consumption: A Theoretical and Environmental Policy Perspective
SPAARGAREN, G. (2003) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920309192 · Cited by 573
Regulation as a means for the social control of technology
Braun, E., & Wield, D. (1994) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537329408524171 · Cited by 353
Collingridge and the dilemma of control: Towards responsible and accountable innovation
Genus, A., & Stirling, A. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Schot, J. W.
- Venue
- Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-56
- ISSN
- 0162-2439 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8251
- OpenAlex
- W2013792775
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 42.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/016224399201700103
- The paper
- Schot, J. W. (1992). Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.