Cited by 230Health Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCultural Competency in Health Care

Cultural Adaptation Process for International Dissemination of the Strengthening Families Program

Kumpfer, Karol L., Pinyuchon, Methinin, de Melo, Ana Teixeira, Whiteside, Henry O.·2008·Evaluation & the Health Professions

Abstract

The Strengthening Families Program (SFP) is an evidence-based family skills training intervention developed and found efficacious for substance abuse prevention by U.S researchers in the 1980s. In the 1990s, a cultural adaptation process was developed to transport SFP for effectiveness trials with diverse populations (African, Hispanic, Asian, Pacific Islander, and Native American). Since 2003, SFP has been culturally adapted for use in 17 countries. This article reviews the SFP theory and research and a recommended cultural adaptation process. Challenges in international dissemination of evidence-based programs (EBPs) are discussed based on the results of U.N. and U.S. governmental initiatives to transport EBP family interventions to developing countries. The technology transfer and quality assurance system are described, including the language translation and cultural adaptation process for materials development, staff training, and on-site and online Web-based supervision and technical assistance and evaluation services to assure quality implementation and process evaluation feedback for improvements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0163278708315926

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 230

Authors
Kumpfer, K. L., Pinyuchon, M., de Melo, A. T., & Whiteside, H. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Thaksin University (TH)
  • Gabinete de Atendimento à Família, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
  • LutraGroup, International SFP Training and Evaluation Center
Venue
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Published
2008-06
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
226-239
ISSN
  • 0163-2787 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3918
OpenAlex
W2107894557
Cited by
230
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 22
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation & the Health Professions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
Strengthening Families Program, cultural adaptation, international dissemination, evidence-based programs, family skills training, substance use prevention, technology transfer, quality assurance, language translation, employee training, technical assistance, process evaluation, developing countries
MeSH terms
Cultural Characteristics, Diffusion of Innovation, Family, Health Promotion, Humans, Quality Control, Staff Development, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review