Cited by 517Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsMedical Malpractice and Liability IssuesEthics in medical practice

Health Care Professionals as Second Victims after Adverse Events: A Systematic Review

Open access
Seys, Deborah, Wu, Albert W., Gerven, Eva Van, Vleugels, Arthur, Euwema, Martin, Panella, Massimiliano, Scott, Susan D., Conway, James +2 more·2013·Evaluation & the Health Professions

Abstract

Adverse events within health care settings can lead to two victims. The first victim is the patient and family and the second victim is the involved health care professional. The latter is the focus of this review. The objectives are to determine definitions of this concept, research the prevalence and the impact of the adverse event on the second victim, and the used coping strategies. Therefore a literature research was performed by using a three-step search procedure. A total of 32 research articles and 9 nonresearch articles were identified. The second victim phenomenon was first described by Wu in 2000. In 2009, Scott et al. introduced a detailed definition of second victims. The prevalence of second victims after an adverse event varied from 10.4% up to 43.3%. Common reactions can be emotional, cognitive, and behavioral. The coping strategies used by second victims have an impact on their patients, colleagues, and themselves. After the adverse event, defensive as well as constructive changes have been reported in practice. The second victim phenomenon has a significant impact on clinicians, colleagues, and subsequent patients. Because of this broad impact it is important to offer support for second victims. When an adverse event occurs, it is critical that support networks are in place to protect both the patient and involved health care providers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0163278712458918

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Altman, D.E., Clancy, C. & Blendon R.J. (2004). Improving patient safety -five years after the IOM report. The New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 2041-2043
  2. Arndt, M.. (1994a). Nurses' medication errors. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 519-526.
  3. Ashok, J. & Ogden, J. (1999). General practitioners" experience of patients" complaints: qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 318, 1596-1599.
  4. Berlinger, N. & Wu, A.W. (2005). Subtracting insult from injury: addressing cultural expectations in the disclosure of medical error. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 106- 108.
  5. Christensen, J.F., Levinson, W. & Dunn, P.M. (1992). The heart of darkness: the impact of perceived mistakes on physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 7, 424-431.
  6. Conway, J., Federico, F., Stewart, K. & Campbell, M. (2010). Respectful management of serious clinical adverse events. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
  7. Cunningham, W. (2004). The immediate and long-term impact on New Zealand doctors who receive patient complaints. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 117, U972.
  8. Denham, C.R. (2007). TRUST: the 5 rights of the second victim. Journal of Patient Safety, 3, 107-119.
  9. Fischer, M.A., Mazor, K.M., Baril, J., Alper, E., DeMarco, D. & Pugnaire, M. (2006). Learning from mistakes. Factors that influence how students and residents learn from medical errors. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 419-423.
  10. Gallagher, T.H., Waterman, A.D., Ebers, A.G., Fraser, V.J. & Levinson, W. (2003). Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 1001-1007.
  11. Goldberg, R.M., Kuhn, G., Andrew, L.B. & Thomas, H.A. Jr. (2002). Coping with medical mistakes and errors in judgment. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39, 287-292.
  12. Kaldjian, L.C., Forman-Hoffman, V.L., Jones, E.W., Wu, B.J., Levi, B.H. & Rosenthal, G.E. (2008). Do faculty and resident physicians discuss their medical errors? Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 717-722.
  13. King, M.B., Cockcroft, A. & Gooch, C. (1992). Emotional distress in doctors: Sources, effects and help sought. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 85, 605-608.
  14. Kohn, T., Corrigan, J.M. & Donaldson, M.S. (Eds.). (1999). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  15. Landrigan, C.P., Parry, G.J., Bones, C.B., Hackbarth, A.D., Goldmann, D.A. & Sharek, P.J. (2010). Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2573.
  16. Levinson, W. & Dunn, P.M. (1989). A piece of my mind. Coping with fallibility. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 261, 2252.
  17. Meurier, C.E., Vincent, C.A. & Parmar, D.G. (1997). Learning from errors in nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 111-119.
  18. Meurier, C.E., Vincent, C.A. & Parmar, D.G. (1998). Nurses' responses to severity dependent errors: a study of the causal attributions made by nurses following an error. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 349-354.
  19. Penson, R.T., Svendsen, S.S., Chabner, B.A., Lynch, T.J. Jr & Levinson, W. (2001). Medical mistakes: a workshop on personal perspectives. Oncologist, 6, 92-99.
  20. Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal, 320, 768-770.
  21. Schelbred, A.B. & Nord, R. (2007). Nurses' experiences of drug administration errors. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60, 317-324.
  22. Scott, S.D., Hirschinger, L.E. & Cox, K.R. (2008). Sharing the load. Rescuing the healer after trauma. Registered Nurse journal, 71, 38-43.
  23. Scott, S.D., Hirschinger, L.E., Cox, K.R., McCoig, M., Hahn-Cover, K., Epperly, K.M., … Hall, L.W. (2010). Caring for our own: deploying a systemwide second victim rapid response team. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 36, 233- 240.
  24. Sirriyeh, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P. & Armitage, G. (2010). Coping with medical error: a systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals' psychological well-being. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 19, e43.
  25. Smith, ML. & Forster, HP. (2000). Morally managing medical mistakes. Cambridge Quarterly of Health care Ethics 9, 38-53.
  26. Vincent, C. (2003). Understanding and responding to adverse events. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 1051-1056.
  27. Waterman, A.D., Garbutt, J., Hazel, E., Dunagan, W.C., Levinson, W., Fraser, V.J. & Gallagher, T.H. (2007). The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 33, 467-476.
  28. West, C.P., Huschka, M.M., Novotny, P.J., Sloan, J.A., Kolars, J.C., Habermann, T.M. & Shanafelt, T.D. (2006). Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1071-1078.
  29. West, C.P., Tan, A.D., Habermann, T.M., Sloan, J.A. & Shanafelt, T.D. (2009). Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 1294-1300.
  30. Wu, A.W. (2000). Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. British Medical Journal, 320, 726-727.
  31. Wu, A.W., Folkman, S., McPhee, S.J. & Lo, B. (1993). How house officers cope with their mistakes. Western Journal of Medicine, 159,565-569.
  32. Wu, A.W., Sexton, J. & Pham, J.C. (2008). Health care providers: The second victim of medical error. In: Croskerry, P., Cosby, S.K., Schenkel, S.M., Wears, R. (Eds.),

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seys, D., Wu, A. W., Gerven, E. V., Vleugels, A., Euwema, M., Panella, M., Scott, S. D., Conway, J., Sermeus, W., & Vanhaecht, K.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT)
  • University of Missouri Health System (US)
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement (US)
Corresponding author
Vanhaecht, Kris
Venue
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Published
2012-09-12
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
135-162
ISSN
  • 0163-2787 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3918
OpenAlex
W2082157355
Cited by
517
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evaluation & the Health Professions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
second victim phenomenon, adverse events, healthcare workers, coping strategies, prevalence, social support networks, patient safety
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, United States, Medical Errors, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review