Cited by 18Diversity and Career in MedicineGlobal Health Workforce IssuesCultural Competency in Health Care

Diversifying the health-care workforce begins at the pipeline: a 5-year synthesis of processes and outputs of the scholarships for Disadvantaged Students Program

Camacho, Alex, Zangaro, George, White, Kathleen M.·2017·Evaluation & the Health Professions

Abstract

The case for a more diverse health-care workforce has never been stronger given the rapidly changing demographics of the United States and the continued underrepresentation of certain racial and ethnic groups across the health professions. To date, progress toward diversifying the health-care workforce has been and continues to be deterred by a mix of factors at the societal, institutional, and individual levels. Since the 1970s, the Federal government has invested resources in initiatives that support the training and development of the existing workforce as well increase the supply of new health professionals—particularly those from underrepresented minority groups and/or from disadvantaged backgrounds. However, limited studies have been published detailing the processes, outputs and, where available, outcomes of such investments across multiple years. This article describes how the Health Resources and Services Administration’s Bureau of Health Workforce used retrospective case study methodology to evaluate processes and outputs associated with the Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students program—an over US$40 million annual Federal investment aimed at offsetting tuition costs for health professions students from disadvantaged backgrounds—over a 5-year period. Lessons learned and recommendations for strengthening the program’s design and requirements are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0163278715617809

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camacho, A., Zangaro, G., & White, K. M.
Affiliations
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Health Resources and Services Administration/Bureau of Health Workforce, Rockville, MD, USA
  • Health Resources and Services Administration (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Published
2015-12-09
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
127-150
ISSN
  • 0163-2787 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3918
OpenAlex
W2406501286
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation & the Health Professions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
health workforce diversity, disadvantaged students, health professions education, program evaluation, tuition assistance, racial and ethnic disparities in health care, Health Resources and Services Administration
MeSH terms
Adult, Fellowships and Scholarships, Female, Financing, Government, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Retrospective Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Cultural Diversity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review