Cited by 128Aging and Gerontology ResearchRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentAging, Health, and Disability

Forever Young?: A Comparison of Age Identities in the United States and Germany

Open access
Westerhof, Gerben J., Barrett, Anne E., Steverink, Nardi·2003·Research on Aging

Abstract

This study compares age identities of middle-aged and older adults in the United States and Germany. Differences between countries in social systems and cultural meanings of old age are expected to produce different age identities. Data are from respondents between ages 40 and 74 in the United States (MIDUS; n = 2,006) and Germany (German Aging Survey; n = 3,331). Americans and Germans tend to feel younger than their actual age, but the discrepancy is larger among Americans. The bias toward youthful identities is stronger at older ages, particularly among Americans. In both counties, persons with better health have younger identities and role losses are not related to age identities. The study shows that different social and cultural systems produce different subjective experiences of aging. As these differences exist within Western culture, the study makes clear that one should be careful in generalizing findings from aging research across countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027503025004002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People in the United States hold more youthful identities and greater health benefits accrue from them, compared with those in Germany.

    “The authors reported that people in the United States hold more youthful identities and greater health benefits accrue from them, compared with those in Germany.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Westerhof et al. 2003

  • The liberal welfare state regime in the United States places more responsibility on individuals to plan for their later years.

    “They argued that the liberal welfare state regime in the United States places more responsibility on individuals to plan for their later years-perhaps increasing the pressure to exaggerate one's youthfulness.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Westerhof et al. 2003

  • Germany's political regime makes later life well-being more a concern of the state.

    “Germany's political regime makes later life well-being more a concern of the state.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Westerhof et al. 2003

  • Germany's mandatory retirement age may make it more difficult to disregard actual age than in the United States.

    “In addition, Germany's mandatory retirement age may make it more difficult to disregard actual age than in the United States, where most occupations have no such requirement.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Westerhof et al. 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westerhof, G. J., Barrett, A. E., & Steverink, N.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Venue
Research on Aging
Published
2003-07
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
366-383
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
OpenAlex
W2124591674
Cited by
128
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
age identity, subjective age, middle-aged adults, older adults, cross-national comparison, United States, Germany, health and aging, role loss, subjective experience of aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review