CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 174Aging and Gerontology ResearchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role Enhancement or Role Strain: Assessing the Impact of Multiple Productive Roles on Older Caregiver Well-Being

Rozario, Philip A., Morrow-Howell, Nancy, Hinterlong, James E.·2004·Research on Aging
DOI 10.1177/0164027504264437
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Proponents of productive aging claim that occupying productive roles is beneficial to the self and others. The authors use the role enhancement and role strain perspectives to examine the impact of multiple productive roles on the well-being of older caregivers. Using three waves of the America Changing Lives Study, the authors controlled for invariant and time-variant factors to test the effects of occupying multiple productive roles on the three well-being indicators of 270 older caregivers. Older caregivers who worked and/or volunteered reported better self-rated health, supporting the role enhancement hypothesis. No evidence of role strain was found. For caregivers without multiple productive roles, high informal social integration was related with low functional impairment. This study suggests that productive roles may have a positive effect on older caregivers and finds no evidence of any negative effects. The implications of these findings in policy, research, and program development are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027504264437

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Allison, Paul D., 2001, Missing Data
  2. Fischer, Lucy R., 1993, Older Volunteers: Enlisting the Talent
  3. Freedman, Marc, 1994, Seniors in National and Community Service: A Report Card Prepared for the Commonwealth Fund’s Americans Over 55 at Work Program
  4. House, James, 1997, American Changing Lives: Waves I and II, 1986 and 1989, Codebook (Part 2)
  5. Liang, Kung-Yee, 1986, Biometrika, 38, 963
  6. Morrow-Howell, Nancy, Longer Life Foundation
  7. Scharlach, Andrew E., 1994, The Gerontologist, 54, S271

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 174

Related

Metadata

Authors
Rozario, P. A., Morrow-Howell, N., & Hinterlong, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Adelphi University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Research on Aging
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2004-07
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
413-428
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
DOI
10.1177/0164027504264437
OpenAlex
W2100571374
Cited by
174
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
productive aging, older caregivers, role enhancement, role strain, volunteering, work, self-rated health, functional disability, well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review