Chronic Illness Self-Management While Living Alone in Later Life: A Systematic Integrative Review
Abstract
Older people living alone (OPLA) are considered vulnerable because of fewer resources, such as social support. As self-management becomes increasingly important in chronic care, evidence is needed on how to better support OPLA. This review synthesizes the evidence from 32 publications on the challenges as well as strategies of OPLA in managing chronic conditions. On the basis of a systematic database search and review process, being independent and being at home were identified as crucial when living alone in later life; both involve decision making and the adjustment of routines to manage everyday life and chronic conditions. These findings show that OPLA are vulnerable because of difficult living situations, limited resources, or a lack of support, and they actively manage their conditions using various strategies to remain independent, but these may cause fragile arrangements that can jeopardize independence. Awareness of these strategies is a starting point to develop interventions for self-management support in chronic illness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People who live alone in later life may be more vulnerable in terms of social, behavioural, functional, and socioeconomic factors.
“People who live alone in later life may be more vulnerable in terms of social, behavioural, functional, and socioeconomic factors (Bergland & Engedal, 2011;Haslbeck, McCorkle, & Schaeffer, 2012;Hughes & Waite, 2002;Shaw, Fors, Fritzell, Lennartsoon, & Agahi, 2017).”
From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as Haslbeck et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Haslbeck, J. W., McCorkle, R., & Schaeffer, D.
- Affiliations
- Careum Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland
- Yale University (US)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Venue
- Research on Aging
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-01-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 507-547
- ISSN
- 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7573
- OpenAlex
- W2118407826
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Keywords
- chronic disease self-management, elderly living alone, old age, independence, self-management support, social support, living arrangements, decision-making, self-management interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review