Cited by 64Aging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Chronic Illness Self-Management While Living Alone in Later Life: A Systematic Integrative Review

Haslbeck, Jörg W., McCorkle, Ruth, Schaeffer, Doris·2012·Research on Aging

Abstract

Older people living alone (OPLA) are considered vulnerable because of fewer resources, such as social support. As self-management becomes increasingly important in chronic care, evidence is needed on how to better support OPLA. This review synthesizes the evidence from 32 publications on the challenges as well as strategies of OPLA in managing chronic conditions. On the basis of a systematic database search and review process, being independent and being at home were identified as crucial when living alone in later life; both involve decision making and the adjustment of routines to manage everyday life and chronic conditions. These findings show that OPLA are vulnerable because of difficult living situations, limited resources, or a lack of support, and they actively manage their conditions using various strategies to remain independent, but these may cause fragile arrangements that can jeopardize independence. Awareness of these strategies is a starting point to develop interventions for self-management support in chronic illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027511429808

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People who live alone in later life may be more vulnerable in terms of social, behavioural, functional, and socioeconomic factors.

    “People who live alone in later life may be more vulnerable in terms of social, behavioural, functional, and socioeconomic factors (Bergland & Engedal, 2011;Haslbeck, McCorkle, & Schaeffer, 2012;Hughes & Waite, 2002;Shaw, Fors, Fritzell, Lennartsoon, & Agahi, 2017).”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as Haslbeck et al., 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 64

Authors
Haslbeck, J. W., McCorkle, R., & Schaeffer, D.
Affiliations
  • Careum Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Yale University (US)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
Venue
Research on Aging
Published
2012-01-10
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
507-547
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
OpenAlex
W2118407826
Cited by
64
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
chronic disease self-management, elderly living alone, old age, independence, self-management support, social support, living arrangements, decision-making, self-management interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review