Cited by 142Health disparities and outcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Living alone and cognitive function in later life

Open access
Evans, Isobel E.M., Llewellyn, David J., Matthews, Fiona E., Woods, Robert T., Brayne, Carol, Clare, Linda·2019·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Living alone may be associated with greater risk for social isolation and loneliness. Living alone, social isolation, loneliness, and limited engagement in social activity have all been associated with poorer cognitive function in later life. Hence, if individuals who live alone are also at greater risk of isolation and loneliness, this may exacerbate poor cognitive function. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether people living alone are more at risk of social isolation, feelings of loneliness, and limited social activity, and to examine the associations between living alone and cognitive function in later life. METHOD: Baseline (N = 2197) and two-year follow-up (N = 1498) data from community-dwelling participants, age ≥65 years, without cognitive impairment or depression at baseline from CFAS-Wales were used. Linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between living arrangement and cognitive function at baseline and two-year follow-up. RESULTS: People living alone were more isolated from family and experienced more emotional loneliness than those living with others, but were not more isolated from friends, did not experience more social loneliness, and were more likely to engage in regular social activity. Living alone was not associated with poorer cognitive function at baseline or two-year follow-up. DISCUSSION: These findings have positive implications and suggest that people who live alone in later life are not at greater risk of poor cognitive function at baseline or two-year follow-up. Social isolation may be more associated with poor cognitive function.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In CFAS-Wales, community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 without baseline cognitive impairment or depression who lived alone were more isolated from family and more emotionally lonely, but not more isolated from friends or socially lonely, and were slightly more likely to engage in regular social activity. Living alone was not associated with poorer global cognitive function at baseline or two-year follow-up.

Key findings

  • At baseline (N = 2197; 624 living alone), people living alone had lower overall social isolation scores (15.75 vs 16.33, p = .032) and family isolation scores (8.31 vs 8.83, p < .001), but no difference in friend isolation (7.44 vs 7.50, p = .762). They reported greater overall loneliness (.99 vs .75, p < .001) and emotional loneliness (.55 vs .31, p < .001), but no difference in social loneliness (.44 vs .44, p = .982). They were more likely to attend social groups regularly (53.53% vs 47.11%, p = .025).
  • Living alone was not significantly associated with global CAMCOG score at baseline in the fully adjusted model (B = −.02, 95% CI −.09 to .06, p = .641) or at two-year follow-up (B = .03, 95% CI −.13 to .18, p = .735).
  • In baseline subdomain analyses, living alone was significantly associated with praxis (B = .08, 95% CI .02 to .14, p = .016), but not orientation, comprehension, expression, memory, attention/calculation, abstract thinking, or perception. At two-year follow-up, living alone was not significantly associated with any CAMCOG subdomain.
  • Social isolation predicted poor cognitive function at baseline and two-year follow-up; loneliness and social activity predicted poor cognitive function at baseline but not at follow-up.

Methods

  • Longitudinal CFAS-Wales study of community-dwelling people aged ≥65 years, recruited from general practice registers in one rural and one urban Welsh location, stratified into 65–74 and ≥75 age groups; baseline data collected 2011–2013 and follow-up two years later, 2013–2015.
  • Exclusions at baseline included MMSE ≤25 (N = 908), AGECAT dementia (N = 185), AGECAT depression (N = 333), institutional residence (N = 95), and missing data (N = 463 baseline; N = 699 follow-up), leaving N = 2197 for cross-sectional analyses and N = 1498 for two-year follow-up analyses.
  • Linear regressions assessed living arrangement and CAMCOG score at baseline and two-year follow-up, controlling for baseline cognition in longitudinal models and for age, gender, education, social isolation, loneliness, social activity, marital status, and ADL impairment; an attrition weight was applied to prospective analyses.

Limitations

  • Stated: limited cognitive decline occurred over two years, with some participants improving, so a two-year follow-up may be insufficient to detect an association with living alone; dropouts were more socially isolated, lonelier, and had poorer cognitive and cognitive reserve scores, making the follow-up sample selectively higher functioning; duration of living alone and circumstances such as recent bereavement could not be determined; “playing chess and cards” may reflect both cognitive and social activity; the study used global, person-level variables and lacked qualitative perspective on the experience of living alone.
  • Evident: living arrangement and marital status were highly correlated (r = −.78), making it difficult to separate their effects; the follow-up sample was selective toward higher-functioning individuals, which may account for limited cognitive change and null follow-up findings.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2018.12.014

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 70 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Living arrangement was not significantly associated with cognitive function at two-year follow-up in the fully adjusted model.

    “Living arrangement was not significantly associated with cognitive function at follow-up in the fully adjusted model (adjusted R 2 = .49,F(10, 1488) = 93.15,p < .001:Table 6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    People living alone reported greater emotional loneliness than those living with others.

    “People living alone reported significantly greater feelings of overall loneliness and emotional loneliness, but there was no difference in feelings of social loneliness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Living alone was significantly associated with the praxis sub-domain of the CAMCOG at baseline.

    “Living alone was significantly associated with praxis (adjusted R 2 = .07,F(9, 2187) = 19.08,p < .001),but not orientation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Living alone was not significantly associated with poorer CAMCOG scores at baseline in the fully adjusted model.

    “Living alone was not significantly associated with poorer CAMCOG scores in the fully adjusted model (adjusted R 2 = .17,F(9, 2187) = 52.36,p < .001:Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Living alone was not significantly associated with two-year change in scores on any CAMCOG sub-domain.

    “Living alone was not significantly associated with two-year change in scores on any of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Social activity predicted poor cognitive function at baseline but not at two-year follow-up.

    “loneliness and social activity predicted poor cognitive function at baseline, but not two-year follow-up”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Loneliness predicted poor cognitive function at baseline but not at two-year follow-up.

    “loneliness and social activity predicted poor cognitive function at baseline, but not two-year follow-up”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    People who were widowed, separated/divorced, or single were more likely to live alone, whereas those who were married continued to live with others.

    “Unsurprisingly, people who were widowed, separated/ divorced, or single were more likely to live alone whereas those who were married continued to live with others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Social isolation predicted poor cognitive function at baseline and two-year follow-up.

    “social isolation predicted poor cognitive function at baseline and two-year follow-up”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other studies have found no association between living alone and poorer scores on measures of global cognitive function, memory, IQ, verbal fluency, and numeracy.

    “Other studies have found no association between living alone and poorer scores on measures of global cognitive function (Conroy et al., 2010;Gow et al., 2013;Mahoney, Eisner, Havighurst, Gray, & Palta, 2000;Wang, He, & Dong, 2015;Yeh & Liu, 2003), memory, IQ (Gow et al., 2013), verbal fluency, and numeracy (Mazzuco et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Conroy et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gow et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mazzuco et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Some studies have reported an association between living alone and poorer scores on tests of global cognitive function, immediate and delayed recall, orientation, processing speed, and IQ.

    “Some studies have reported an association between living alone and poorer scores on tests of global cognitive function (van Gelder et al., 2006;Yaffe et al., 2009), immediate and delayed recall, orientation (Mazzuco, Meggiolaro, Ongaro, & Toffolutti, 2016), processing speed (Gow et al., 2013), and IQ (Gow et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites van Gelder et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yaffe et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mazzuco et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Social isolation may be more associated with poor cognitive function.

    “Social isolation may be more associated with poor cognitive function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    People who live alone in later life are not at greater risk of poor cognitive function at baseline or two-year follow-up.

    “These findings have positive implications and suggest that people who live alone in later life are not at greater risk of poor cognitive function at baseline or two-year follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social interactions are effortful and require the mobilisation of complex cognitive processes, and therefore may help to build reserve and maintain cognitive function.

    “Social interactions are effortful and require the mobilisation of complex cognitive processes, and therefore may help to build reserve and maintain cognitive function (Barnes et al., 2004;Fratiglioni, Paillard-Borg, & Winblad, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Barnes et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fratiglioni et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Living with others may enhance cognitive function directly through the stimulation arising from regular social interaction with others.

    “From a cognitive reserve perspective, living with others may enhance cognitive function directly through the stimulation arising from regular social interaction with others (van Gelder et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites van Gelder et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    CFAS-Wales is a large population-based cohort that is representative of the general population.

    “CFAS-Wales is a large population-based cohort that is representative of the general population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Participants were randomly selected from general practice registers and stratified into two age groups (65-74 and ≥75) to ensure a representative sample.

    “People aged ≥65 years were randomly selected from general practice registers and stratified into two age groups (65-74 and ≥75) to ensure a representative sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Having poor social relationships has been associated with a range of negative health outcomes.

    “having poor social relationships has been associated with a range of negative health outcomes (Holt-Lunstad & Smith, 2012;Scharf, Phillipson, & Smith, 2004;Steptoe, Shankar, Demakakos, & Wardle, 2013;Tomaszewski, 2013;Umberson & Montez, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Holt-Lunstad & Smith, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Steptoe et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Umberson & Montez, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The CAMCOG has good inter-rater reliability (r = .97), high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (96%).

    “The CAMCOG has good inter-rater reliability (r = .97),high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (96%: Roth et al., 1986;Wouters, van Gool, Schmand, Zwinderman, & Lindeboom, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Roth et al., 1986 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wouters et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals who live alone may have less frequent opportunity for social contact, may be more isolated, and may feel more lonely than those who live with others, which may result in reduced cognitive stimulation and lower cognitive reserve.

    “Individuals who live alone may have less frequent opportunity for social contact, may be more isolated (Carstensen, 1992;de Jong Gierveld & Havens, 2004;de Jong Gierveld, 2003;Kobayashi et al., 2009), and may feel more lonely (Newall et al., 2014;Victor et al., 2005) than those who live with others, which may result in reduced cognitive stimulation and lower cognitive reserve (Gow et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Carstensen, 1992 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Newall et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gow et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Reserve can be built through a range of experiences across the lifespan, such as educational level, occupational complexity, and social and cognitive activity.

    “Reserve can be built through a range of experiences across the lifespan, such as educational level, occupational complexity, and social and cognitive activity (Stern, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stern, 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    People living in an institution were excluded because living with others in institutional care is different from living with others in the community.

    “We excluded people living in an institution (N = 95) as living with others in institutional care is different to living with others in the community.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Living alone, social isolation, and loneliness are distinct concepts and living alone does not necessarily mean that an individual will be isolated, feel lonely, or engage in less social activity.

    “Living alone, social isolation, and loneliness are distinct concepts and living alone does not necessarily mean that an individual will be isolated, feel lonely, or engage in less social activity (Klinenberg, 2016;Victor et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Klinenberg, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Victor et al., 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Good social relationships are identified as an important aspect of successful ageing.

    “Good social relationships are identified as an important aspect of successful ageing (Rowe & Kahn, 1997)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe & Kahn, 1997 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    An attrition weight was used to account for the attrition of participants between baseline and follow-up and applied to all prospective analyses.

    “We used an attrition weight to account for the attrition of participants between baseline and follow-up and applied this to all prospective analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive reserve theory suggests that individuals differ in their level of resilience against brain pathology and hence may exhibit differences in cognitive function despite equivalent levels of pathology.

    “Cognitive reserve theory suggests that individuals differ in their level of resilience against brain pathology and hence may exhibit differences in cognitive function despite equivalent levels of pathology (Stern, 2002(Stern, , 2012)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stern, 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stern, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social isolation, feelings of loneliness, low engagement in social activity, and living alone simultaneously confer risk for impaired health and poorer wellbeing.

    “Social isolation, feelings of loneliness, low engagement in social activity, and living alone simultaneously confer risk for impaired health and poorer wellbeing (Kharicha et al., 2007;Klinenberg, 2016;Pimouguet et al., 2015;Udell et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kharicha et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Klinenberg, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pimouguet et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Older people face changes in their social environments and as a result may be at greater risk of social isolation and feelings of loneliness.

    “Older people face changes in their social environments and as a result may be at greater risk of social isolation and feelings of loneliness (Finlay & Kobayashi, 2018;Klinenberg, 2016;Victor, Scambler, Bond, & Bowling, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Finlay & Kobayashi, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Klinenberg, 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Victor et al., 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People who live alone are often solely responsible for completing household tasks, such as paying the bills, shopping, cleaning, maintenance, and answering the telephone or door, which all require cognitive input.

    “People who live alone are often solely responsible for completing household tasks, such as paying the bills, shopping, cleaning, maintenance, and answering the telephone or door, which all require cognitive input (Jekel et al., 2015;Njegovan, Man-Son-Hing, Mitchell, & Molnar, 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jekel et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Njegovan et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    An additional limitation is that 'playing chess and cards' was included in the cognitive activity score but may also contribute to social activity.

    “An additional limitation is that 'playing chess and cards' was included in the cognitive activity score but may also contribute to social activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Living alone is not necessarily a risk factor in itself for people who are in good health and have sufficient social connections; it may be a positive state for many people and reflect the maintenance of functional independence.

    “Living alone is not necessarily a risk factor in itself for people who are in good health and have sufficient social connections; it may be a positive state for many people and reflect the maintenance of functional independence”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kharicha et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mazzuco et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The importance of social isolation in later life and the benefits of having a wide social network and engagement in frequent social activity on cognitive function are reinforced by the present findings.

    “This further reinforces the importance of social isolation in later life and the benefits of having a wide social network and engagement in frequent social activity on cognitive function (Evans et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Evans et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Living arrangement is a basic structural assessment of social connections and does not consider the wider social context.

    “Living arrangement is a basic structural assessment of social connections and does not consider the wider social context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Social isolation measured by the LSNS-6 is much more comprehensive than the single question assessing living arrangement and provides an indication of the level of interaction with a range of people in the community.

    “This is much more comprehensive than the single question which assesses living arrangement and provides an indication of the level of interaction with a range of people in the community.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People who live alone and are unable to complete household tasks due to poor cognitive function or health are unlikely to manage independently at home and may be more likely to move into a care home.

    “People who live alone and are unable to complete household tasks due to poor cognitive function or health are unlikely to manage independently at home and may be more likely to move into a care home (Cornelis, Gorus, Beyer, Bautmans, & De Vriendt, 2017;Wang et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cornelis et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Crystallised cognitive abilities, such as those assessed in the measure of IQ, may be less associated with cognitive ageing, whereas fluid cognitive domains such as executive functions and memory may be more affected by ageing.

    “It has been suggested that crystallised cognitive abilities, such as those assessed in the measure of IQ may be less associated with cognitive ageing, whereas fluid cognitive domains such as executive functions and memory may be more affected by ageing”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Christensen, 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Deary et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hedden & Gabrieli, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The friendship networks of people living alone being as strong as those living with others may mitigate the degree of isolation from family and feelings of loneliness and hence benefit cognitive function.

    “which may mitigate the degree of isolation from family and feelings of loneliness and hence benefit cognitive function”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
32 of 32

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that provided cognitive domain-specific results are scarce and have not accounted for the correlation between repeated measures on the same individual over time.

    “Studies that provided cognitive domain-specific results are scarce and have not accounted for the correlation between repeated measures on the same individual over time.10,17,32”

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 52.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(9, 2187) = 52.36,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 19.08reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(9, 2187) = 19.08,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 1.49reported p = .146 · recomputed p = .146

    “F(9, 2187) = 1.49, p = .146”

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 5.64reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(9, 2187) = 5.64, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 31.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(9, 2187) = 31.89,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 11.21reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(9, 2187) = 11.21,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 7.38reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(9, 2187) = 7.38, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 10.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(9, 2187) = 10.51,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(9, 2187) = 34.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(9, 2187) = 34.26,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 93.15reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(10, 1488) = 93.15,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(10, 1488) = 4.77, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 9.35reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(10, 1488) = 9.35, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 34.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(10, 1488) = 34.60,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 53reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(10, 1488) = 53.00,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 17.48reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(10, 1488) = 17.48, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 30.1reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F (10, 1488) = 30.10,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 22.64reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F (10, 1488) = 22.64, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(10, 1488) = 43.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(10, 1488) = 43.36,p < .001”

18 of 18

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Discussion claims a follow-up praxis association that the results do not show

    Major

    The discussion says living alone was significantly associated with poorer praxis scores at follow-up. Table 7 reports a follow-up praxis coefficient whose confidence interval includes zero and whose p-value is .481.

  • Included participants' social-isolation subscales do not sum to the overall score

    Minor

    The scale's overall score is defined as the sum of its family and friends subscales. For participants included at follow-up, the reported means sum to 17.48, not the reported overall mean of 16.48.

    Reported 16.48 · recomputed 17.48

  • Conflicting descriptions of loneliness among participants lost to follow-up

    Minor

    The study-population section says those excluded from follow-up did not experience greater loneliness, whereas the limitations section says those who dropped out were more likely to experience loneliness.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, I. E. M., Llewellyn, D. J., Matthews, F. E., Woods, R. T., Brayne, C., & Clare, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Evans, Isobel E.M.
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
81
Pages
222-233
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907120003
Cited by
142
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • ESRC (RES-060-25-0060)
  • HEFCW
  • Alzheimer’s Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
living alone, cognitive function, social isolation, loneliness, social activity, older adults, living arrangements, emotional loneliness, social loneliness, family isolation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Social Isolation, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review