Cited by 58Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

An Individual Differences Perspective: Implications for Cognitive Research in Gerontology

Hertzog, Christopher·1985·Research on Aging

Abstract

This article sketches the fundamental characteristics of an individual differences orientation to gerontological research, with particular reference to adult cognitive development. It is shown that cross-sectional differences in variances and covariances often reported in the gerontological literature are consistent with the hypothesis of individual differences in patterns of change. However, different covariance structures at different cross-sectional age levels are also consistent with the hypothesis that the constructs being measured are qualitatively different at different ages. Longitudinal research explicitly measuring individual differences in change is required to differentiate between the two classes of hypotheses. The article outlines the general features of a research strategy that employs longitudinal designs and structural equation models to examine patterns and predictors of individual differences in adult cognitive development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027585007001002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hertzog, C.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hertzog, Christopher
Venue
Research on Aging
Published
1985-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
7-45
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
OpenAlex
W2109477685
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AGO4611-O1A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
individual differences, adult cognitive development, aging, change patterns, covariance structure, longitudinal study design, structural equation modeling
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review