An Individual Differences Perspective: Implications for Cognitive Research in Gerontology
Abstract
This article sketches the fundamental characteristics of an individual differences orientation to gerontological research, with particular reference to adult cognitive development. It is shown that cross-sectional differences in variances and covariances often reported in the gerontological literature are consistent with the hypothesis of individual differences in patterns of change. However, different covariance structures at different cross-sectional age levels are also consistent with the hypothesis that the constructs being measured are qualitatively different at different ages. Longitudinal research explicitly measuring individual differences in change is required to differentiate between the two classes of hypotheses. The article outlines the general features of a research strategy that employs longitudinal designs and structural equation models to examine patterns and predictors of individual differences in adult cognitive development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive development across life likely includes compensatory shifts in procedures or strategies in response to age- or experience-related change.
“cognitive development over the life course is likely to involve compensatory adaptations to age or experience-related change in the form of shifting cognitive procedures or strategies”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Hertzog, 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Self-citationEducation and cognitive functioning across the life span
Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100620920576 · Cited by 1,224 · see citing works
Influences of cognitive slowing on age differences in intelligence.
Hertzog, C. (1989) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.4.636 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hertzog, C.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hertzog, Christopher
- ORCID
- Hertzog, Christopher
- Venue
- Research on Aging
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-45
- ISSN
- 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7573
- OpenAlex
- W2109477685
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01 AGO4611-O1A1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- individual differences, adult cognitive development, aging, change patterns, covariance structure, longitudinal study design, structural equation modeling
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review