Cited by 8Social Skills and EducationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The Children’s Social Comprehension Scale (CSCS): Construct validity of a new social intelligence measure for elementary school children

Knopp, Katarzyna A·2019·International Journal of Behavioral Development

Abstract

The abilities comprising social intelligence are critical to children’s development and interpersonal functioning, and there is a need for reliable and valid tools for measuring them. This paper describes the Children’s Social Comprehension Scale (CSCS), which is a performance-based test of the cognitive component of social intelligence for young schoolchildren. The CSCS was developed as an easy-to-use and rapid screening tool for diagnosing deficits in social information processing, such as understanding and evaluation of social situations. The final version of the instrument exhibits satisfactory score reliability as measured by Cronbach’s alpha and acceptable factorial validity of results as determined by confirmatory factor analysis for each of the studied age groups (6–7, 8–9, and 10–11 years; N = 358). The validity of the CSCS results is also corroborated by its positive correlations with other measures of social intelligence (stronger), intellectual potential (weaker), and an indicator of effective social functioning. The scores on the test show age differences in the expected direction. All these findings suggest that the CSCS is valid and reliable measure of cognitive social intelligence in children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0165025418787923

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Knopp, K. A.
Affiliations
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw (PL)
Corresponding author
Knopp, Katarzyna A
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
90-96
ISSN
  • 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0651
OpenAlex
W2884118479
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Behavioral Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
social intelligence, social information processing, elementary school students, construct validity, performance-based assessment, screening tool, age differences, intellectual potential, social functioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review