The Children’s Social Comprehension Scale (CSCS): Construct validity of a new social intelligence measure for elementary school children
Abstract
The abilities comprising social intelligence are critical to children’s development and interpersonal functioning, and there is a need for reliable and valid tools for measuring them. This paper describes the Children’s Social Comprehension Scale (CSCS), which is a performance-based test of the cognitive component of social intelligence for young schoolchildren. The CSCS was developed as an easy-to-use and rapid screening tool for diagnosing deficits in social information processing, such as understanding and evaluation of social situations. The final version of the instrument exhibits satisfactory score reliability as measured by Cronbach’s alpha and acceptable factorial validity of results as determined by confirmatory factor analysis for each of the studied age groups (6–7, 8–9, and 10–11 years; N = 358). The validity of the CSCS results is also corroborated by its positive correlations with other measures of social intelligence (stronger), intellectual potential (weaker), and an indicator of effective social functioning. The scores on the test show age differences in the expected direction. All these findings suggest that the CSCS is valid and reliable measure of cognitive social intelligence in children.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Patterns of Moral Judgment Derive From Nonmoral Psychological Representations
Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Social intelligence and decoding of nonverbal cues
Barnes, M. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0160-2896(89)90022-6 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Knopp, K. A. (2023) · Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio · doi:10.34766/fetr.v55i3.1218
Self-citation
- Authors
- Knopp, K. A.
- Affiliations
- Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Knopp, Katarzyna A
- ORCID
- Knopp, Katarzyna A
- Venue
- International Journal of Behavioral Development
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-07-16
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-96
- ISSN
- 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0651
- OpenAlex
- W2884118479
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Behavioral Development (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- China Scholarship Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- social intelligence, social information processing, elementary school students, construct validity, performance-based assessment, screening tool, age differences, intellectual potential, social functioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review