The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences in Cultural Frame of Reference
Abstract
There are at least two prerequisites for understanding the academic performance of minorities in contemporary urban industrial societies. The first is to distinguish among different types of minority status; the second is to distinguish different types of cultural difference. The distinctions between voluntary and involuntary minorities and between primary and secondary cultural differences are used as explanatory concepts. Voluntary minorities do not have persistent basic academic difficulties, no matter what their primary cultural differences from the dominant majority. The people who have the most difficulty with academic achievement are involuntary minorities. These difficulties stem from the responses that involuntary minorities have made to their forced incorporation and subsequent treatment, especially their formation of oppositional identity and oppositional cultural frame of reference. Such responses constitute secondary cultural differences. Unlike primary cultural differences, secondary cultural differences do not predate contact between the minority and the majority groups; rather, they are responses to the difficult nature of the contact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black students' school success: Coping with the ?burden of ?acting white??
Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf01112192 · Cited by 3,323
Self-citationHow Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement
Jensen, A. (1969) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7 · Cited by 2,907
Cited by
Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents
Benet‐Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x · Cited by 1,384
Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1996) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.32.6.1065 · Cited by 819
Issues of Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Caregiving Research: A 20-Year Review (1980-2000)
Dilworth-Anderson, P., Williams, I. C., & Gibson, B. E. (2002) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/42.2.237 · Cited by 759
Cultural Approaches to Parenting
Murray, A. D., & Bornstein, M. H. (1992) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353295 · Cited by 316
Lui, P. P. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038449 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogbu, J. U.
- Venue
- International Journal of Behavioral Development
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 483-506
- ISSN
- 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0651
- OpenAlex
- W2142950575
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in Cultural Frame of Reference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/016502549301600307
- The paper
- Ogbu, J. U. (1993). Differences in Cultural Frame of Reference. International Journal of Behavioral Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502549301600307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.