The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The geography of science: disciplinary and national mappings
Abstract
Chaque annee l'Institut for Scientific Information (ISI) entreprend une analyse de sa banque de donnees, derivee du Science Citation Index et du Social Science Citation Index. Le but de cette analyse est de creer des «cartes de la science» qui montrent la topographie des sciences a divers niveaux d'agregation. Cette technique est encore dans l'enfance mais fait apparaitre des structures interessantes. Une analyse de ces cartes et de la methode utilisee est proposee. (INTD)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199105)42:4<233::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-i · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Small, H., & Garfield, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 147-159
- ISSN
- 0165-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-6485
- OpenAlex
- W1974172838
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The geography of science: disciplinary and national mappings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/016555158501100402
- The paper
- Small, H., & Garfield, E. (1985). The geography of science: disciplinary and national mappings. Journal of Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501100402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
