The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Project of Rationalization: A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies
Abstract
This article critically approaches various neo-institutional accounts of the process of formal organizing. While acknowledging the importance of the overall orientation marked by neo-institutional studies, the article identifies several crucial aspects that have escaped the attention of neo-institutional research. In particular, it criticizes the inability of neo-institutionalism to provide an account of the means linking situated forms of organizing with wider instrumental beliefs and practices, in terms other than adaptivist, diffusionist. Such a limitation is partly a consequence of unwillingness of neo-institutionalism to focus on and analyze the very architecture of the rationalized patterns and relationships which neo-institutionalists claim to be diffusing across organizational populations and fields. Drawing on several sources, the article develops a framework that seeks to outline the conceptual means for decomposing the carriers of rationalized patterns, models and techniques and showing the distinctive ways in which they implicate the building blocks of formal organizing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
D'Amico, R. (1978) · Telos · doi:10.3817/0678036169 · Cited by 19,439
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,820
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,003
Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word
ONG, W. J. (1982) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203328064 · Cited by 6,996
The diffusion of innovations: Some examples of finnish civil servant's professional tours in Europe
Hietala, M. (1983) · Scandinavian Journal of History · doi:10.1080/03468758308579015 · Cited by 6,162
The new institutionalism in organizational analysis
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5991 · Cited by 5,470
The construction of social reality
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-0869 · Cited by 4,674
Goodman, N. (1981) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1574670 · Cited by 3,125
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392383 · Cited by 2,884
The Imaginary Institution of Society
Castoriadis, C. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,830
Cited by
Institutional Logics as Identity Projects
Lok, J. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.57317866 · Cited by 499
Kitchener, M. (2002) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840602233004 · Cited by 351
Addo, A. A. (2016) · THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES · doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00565.x · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 697-720
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2157672085
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Project of Rationalization: A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840600214002
- The paper
- Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2000). The Project of Rationalization: A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.